Ward v. M/Y Utopia IV
Civil Action 22-23847-CIV (S.D. Fla. May. 26, 2023)
Motion to dismiss
4 more...
Nor may the Defendants claim vicarious or non-negligent liability through Jones Act negligence. According to the Jones Act, a maritime employer has a duty to provide their employees with a reasonably safe place to work. Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc., 549 F.2d 314, 329 (5th Cir. 1977). A seaman has a cause of action in negligence under the Jones Act against his employer for personal injuries which the employer or its agents cause, and which occur during the course of employment. 46 U.S.C. § 30104; Skye v. Maersk Line, Ltd. Corp., 751 F.3d 1262, 1265 (11th Cir. 2014). A finding of contributorily negligence does not bar the seaman from bringing a claim, but it will proportionately reduce damages between the employer and the injured seamen. Dempsey v. Mac Towing, Inc., 876 F.2d 1538, 1544 (11th Cir. 1989). The Jones Act eradicated the English fellow servant defense which shielded employers from liability upon a finding that it was a fellow servant of the employee, not the employer, who caused the injury; with the Jones Act's passage employers became liable for the negligence of their agents as well. Mahnich, 321 U.S. at 101, 102. And, finally, a seaman's duty is to carry…
Cooper v. State
No. 5D22-2230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 26, 2023)
We affirm this Anders appeal, except regarding two matters, as to four cases in which Appellant pled open to the court. First, investigative costs of $50 payable to the Daytona Beach Shores Police Department were assessed against Appellant in three of the four cases, despite the fact that there was apparently no request for same. See Richards v. State, 288 So.3d 574, 576 (Fla. 2020). We reverse and remand for entry of amended orders that do not include investigative costs. Second, as to Case No. 2022-304672-MM, the court failed to identify what conditions Appellant had violated that led to revocation of probation. See Hollis v. State, 277 So.3d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (citing Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). We reverse and remand for entry of an amended order identifying the condition(s) the court found Appellant violated in that case.
PAGE 2
Tucker v. LNV Corp.
No. 4D22-984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 24, 2023)
Motion for summary judgment
Tucker complains the trial court erroneously accepted two untimely affidavits in support of LNV's attorney's fee award. The first, LNV's "Amended Affidavit as to Time, Effort, and Costs," was filed only eleven days before the summary judgment hearing. But any error as to this affidavit is waived because Tucker failed to raise this argument below. See Lloyd v. State, 876 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("It is well settled that arguments raised for the first time on appeal are not preserved and are therefore waived.").
PAGE 3
Mitchell v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
8:20-cv-1214-CEH-MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 23, 2023)
The state court reasonably rejected Mitchell's ineffective-assistance claim. “[A]lthough the issue of ineffective assistance . . . is one of constitutional dimension,” a court “must defer to the state's construction of its own law when the validity of the [ineffective-assistance] claim . . . turns on state law.” Pinkney v. Sec'y, DOC, 876 F.3d 1290, 1295 (11th Cir. 2017). Here, the state court found that trial counsel was not ineffective because, under Florida law, the prosecution did not impermissibly stack inferences in presenting its case. (Doc. 7-2, Ex. 10, p. 6.) “The state court therefore has answered the question of what would have happened had counsel objected to [the allegedly improper stacking of inferences]-the objection would have been overruled.” Block v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., No. 8:15-cv-2442-CEH-JSS, 2019 WL 700113, at *8 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 20, 2019); see also Herring v. Sec'y. Dep't of Corr., 397 F.3d 1338, 1354-55 (11th Cir. 2005) (“The Florida Supreme Court already has told us how the issues would have been resolved under state law had [counsel] done what [the appellant] argues he should have done.... It is a fundamental principle that state courts are…
Wade v. McDade
No. 21-14275 (11th Cir. May. 22, 2023)
Motion for summary judgment
4 more...
Our post-Farmer decisions are a jumble, with different panels adopting one of two different mens rea standards at different times. On the one hand, some have interpreted Estelle and Farmer to require a deliberate-indifference plaintiff to show only that the defendant acted with "more than mere negligence." See, e.g., Adams v. Poag, 61 F.3d 1537, 1543 (11th Cir. 1995); McElligott v. Foley, 182 F.3d 1248, 1255 (11th Cir. 1999); Brown v. Johnson, 387 F.3d 1344, 1351 (11th Cir. 2004); Mann v. Taser Int'l, Inc., 588 F.3d 1291, 1307 (11th Cir. 2009); Bingham v. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1171, 1176 (11th Cir. 2011); Jackson v. West, 787 F.3d 1345, 1353 (11th Cir. 2015); Melton v. Abston, 841 F.3d 1207, 1223 (11th Cir. 2016); Mitchell v. Nobles, 873 F.3d 869, 876 (11th Cir. 2017); Swain v. Junior, 961 F.3d 1276, 1285 (11th Cir. 2020); Keohane, 952 F.3d at 1266. On the other hand, just as many (if not more) of our opinions have said that a deliberate-indifference plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with "more than gross negligence." See, e.g., Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480, 1490 (11th Cir. 1996); Bozeman v. Orum, 422 F.3d 1265, 1272 (11th Cir. 2005); Burnette v. Taylor, 533…
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh
No. 21-1496 (U.S. May. 18, 2023)
Motion to dismiss
1 more...
Conversely, conspiracy liability could be premised on a "more attenuated relation with the principal violation" because the defendant and the principal wrongdoer had agreed to a wrongful enterprise. Halberstam, 705 F.2d, at 485; see also Restatement (Second) of Torts §876, Comment a, p. 316 (1979) ("The theory of the early common law was that there was a mutual agency of each to act for the others").
PAGE 20
Dulcio v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency
9:22-CV-81908-ROSENBERG/REINHART (S.D. Fla. May. 17, 2023)
Motion to dismiss
10 more...
To demonstrate standing, a plaintiff must allege facts showing that he suffered an injuryin-fact that is “(a) concrete and particularized, and (b) ‘actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical”; that the injury is “fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant”; and that it is “‘likely,' as opposed to merely ‘speculative,' that the injury will be ‘redressed by a favorable decision.'” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) (internal citations omitted). When a plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, “the injury-in-fact requirement insists that a plaintiff ‘allege facts from which it appears there is a substantial likelihood that he will suffer injury in the future.'” Strickland v. Alexander, 772 F.3d 876, 883 (11th Cir. 2014) (quoting Malowney v. Fed. Collection Deposit Grp., 193 F.3d 1342, 1346 (11th Cir. 1999)). “Additionally, the continuing controversy may not be conjectural, hypothetical, or contingent; it must be real and immediate, and create a definite, rather than speculative threat of future injury.” Malowney, 193 F.3d at 1347.
PAGE 32
Hall v. Merola
No. 20-14247 (11th Cir. May. 17, 2023)
Motion to dismiss
1 more...
"Heck bars a § 1983 claim only when it is a 'logical necessity' that judgment for the plaintiff in that suit would contradict the existing punishment." Dixon, 887 F.3d at 1239 (quoting Dyer v. Lee, 488 F.3d 876, 879 (11th Cir. 2007)). Factual allegations bar claims under Heck in only narrow circumstances: "where the allegation in the § 1983 claim is a specific one that both necessarily implies the earlier decision is invalid and is necessary to the success of the § 1983 suit itself." Id. "When a plaintiff alleges a fact that, if true, would conflict with the earlier punishment, but that fact is not necessary to the success of his § 1983 suit, the Heck bar does not apply." Id.
PAGE 16
Windspeed Enter. v. M/V Semi 1
No. 22-12242 (11th Cir. May. 16, 2023)
2 more...
Cases of admiralty jurisdiction also can include in rem actions over vessels themselves, but "[a]n in rem admiralty proceeding requires as its basis a maritime lien." Crimson Yachts, 603 F.3d at 868; see also The Rock Island Bridge, 73 U.S. (6 Wall) 213, 215 (1867) ("The lien and the proceeding in rem are, therefore, correlative -- where one exists, the other can be taken, and not otherwise."). "A maritime lien is a special property right in a ship given to a creditor by law as security for a debt or claim, and it attaches the moment the debt arises." Crimson Yachts, 603 F.3d at 1228 (quotation marks omitted). Under the CIMLA, "a person providing necessaries to a vessel on the order of the owner or a person authorized by the owner . . . has a maritime lien on the vessel . . . [and] may bring a civil action in rem to enforce the lien." 46 U.S.C. § 31342(a)(1)-(2). So, "to obtain a maritime lien, a person must: (1) provide necessaries; (2) to a vessel; (3) on the order of the owner or agent." Galehead, Inc. v. M/V Anglia, 183 F.3d 1242, 1244 (11th Cir. 1999); accord Barcliff, LLC v. M/V DEEP BLUE, IMO No. 9215359 , 876 F.3d 1063, 1068 (11th Cir. 2017). The necessaries must…
Smith v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
8:20-cv-1150-VMC-JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 15, 2023)
Motion to dismiss
3 more...
The state court reasonably rejected Smith's ineffective-assistance claim. As explained above, a court “must defer to the state's construction of its own law when the validity of [an ineffective-assistance] claim . . . turns on state law.” Pinkney, 876 F.3d at 1295. Here, Smith's ineffective-assistance claim turns on a question of Florida law-namely, whether a Richardson violation occurred when the prosecution presented Officer Kirchgraber as an expert witness. The state court answered that question in the negative, concluding that “the State's limited questioning of [Officer] Kirchgraber did not amount to a Richardson violation.” (Doc. 8-5, Ex. 44, p. 9.) That determination binds this Court. See Herring, 397 F.3d at 1354-55 (“The Florida Supreme Court already has told us how the issues would have been resolved under state law had [counsel] done what [the appellant] argues he should have done.... It is a fundamental principle that state courts are the final arbiters of state law, and federal courts should not second-guess them on such matters.”); Torres v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., No. 8:18-cv-2201-VMC-JSS, 2021 WL 3079700, at *10 (M.D. Fla. July 21, 2021) (“To the extent…

Cases from cite.case.law:

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Smith , 494 U.S. 872, 110 S.Ct. 1595, 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990), for example, the Court explained that " . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Smith , 494 U.S. 872, 879-882, 110 S.Ct. 1595, 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990). . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Smith , 494 U.S. 872, 110 S.Ct. 1595, 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990), the Court explained that "the right of . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc. , 380 U.S. 255, 256, 85 S.Ct. 876, 13 L.Ed.2d 789 (1965) (per curiam . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id., at 875-876, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Rodriguez, Immigration and Refugee Law and Policy 875-876 (5th ed. 2009) (explaining that restrictionist . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . -, 138 S.Ct. 830, 841, 200 L.Ed.2d 122 (2018) (plurality opinion); id. , at ----, 138 S.Ct., at 875-876 . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Edwards & Sons, Inc. , 876 F.2d 69, 70 (CA8 1989) (per curiam ); DeSantis v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. . . . Edwards & Sons, Inc. , 876 F.2d 69, 70 (CA8 1989) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1089, 110 S.Ct . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sadowy , 147 App.Div.2d 874, 876, 538 N.Y.S.2d 96, 98 (1989) ("[T]he subject easement ... reasonably . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Gallagher , 712 F.3d 865, 876 (C.A.4 2013) ; Drake v. . . .

GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE SAS, CORP. SAS, v. OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 1637 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC , 876 F.3d 996, 1000-1001 (CA9 2017) (declining to give weight to the 2006 . . . Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC , 876 F.3d 996, 1001-1002 (CA9 2017), with Aggarao v. MOL Ship Mgmt. . . .

A. RAMIREZ, v. HOGUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2797 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-876. Supreme Court of the United States. May 18, 2020 Petition for rehearing denied. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Smith , 494 U.S. 872, 110 S.Ct. 1595, 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990). . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 1652, 1660, 203 L.Ed.2d 876 (2019). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 378, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (concurring opinion . . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) ; Montejo v. . . . against the importance of having them decided right. " Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 378, 130 S.Ct. 876 . . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), where we overruled precedent . . . in by federal and state lawmakers in adopting the provisions at issue, id ., at 411-412, 130 S.Ct. 876 . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Brignoni-Ponce , 422 U.S. 873, 876, 95 S.Ct. 2574, 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975) (holding that it violated the . . .

A. RAMIREZ, v. HOGUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-876. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

SHULAR, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 779 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Appx. 876 (2018). . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Pena-Irala , 630 F.2d 876 (C.A.2 1980) ). "Domestic officials were not at issue." Rodriguez v. . . .

THOMPSON, v. HEBDON,, 140 S. Ct. 348 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Federal Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 359-360, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) ). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ROMERO, Jr., 935 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 873, 876-77 (10th Cir. 2015) (unpublished) (emphasis added). . . .

BIRD, v. i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS, R., 935 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Servs., LLC , 629 F.3d 876, 893 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Leadsinger, Inc. v. . . .

BELLITTO, v. SNIPES,, 935 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Carnival Corp., 720 F.3d 876, 880 (11th Cir. 2013) (citing United States v. . . .

R. PESCI, v. BUDZ, LLC, LLC,, 935 F.3d 1159 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Honea , 876 F.3d 966, 973 (9th Cir. 2017) ; Hatim v. Obama , 760 F.3d 54, 59 (D.C. Cir. 2014). . . .

SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. BRISTOL EXCAVATING, INC., 935 F.3d 122 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 876. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1652, 1660, 203 L.Ed.2d 876 (2019) (quoting Chafin v. . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kyle , 825 F.3d 876, 885 (8th Cir. 2016) (applying Whittenburg framework). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 876(c) ). Ben Stiller (Director), Zoolander [Film], United States: Paramount Pictures (2001). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pederson , 887 F.3d 870, 876 (9th Cir. 2018) (per curiam). . . .

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., 934 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Inc. , 876 F.3d 1350, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (quoting Intercontinental Great Brands LLC v. . . .

JIE FANG Li v. DIRECTOR UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, 935 F.3d 172 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sec'y of Finance , 876 F.3d 481, 488 n.9 (3d Cir. 2017) 5 U.S.C. § 704. Bennett v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NORMAN,, 935 F.3d 232 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kennedy , 32 F.3d 876 (4th Cir. 1994), which supports the district court's conclusion that the offense . . . Kennedy , 32 F.3d 876, 888 (4th Cir. 1994) ; United States v. . . .

GOLDEN v. NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v., 934 F.3d 302 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Prosecutor's Office , 378 N.J.Super. 539, 876 A.2d 806, 811 (App. Div. 2005). . . . See 876 A.2d at 807-08. . . .

J. BAUWENS, v. REVCON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., 935 F.3d 534 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Univ. of Chicago Hosp. , 207 F.3d 876, 882-84 (7th Cir. 2000). . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC. v. MANGAN, G. J., 933 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . FEC , 558 U.S. 310, 339, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010). . . . Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 340, 130 S.Ct. 876 (quoting WRTL , 551 U.S. at 464, 127 S.Ct. 2652 ). . . . Id . at 368, 130 S.Ct. 876. Nonetheless, the Court upheld the disclaimer requirements. . . . (quoting Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 369, 130 S.Ct. 876 ). . . . Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 371, 130 S.Ct. 876. . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Maersk Line Ltd, 876 F.3d 502, 512 (3d Cir. 2017) (en banc) ("[W]hen our Court is in disagreement with . . .

STUDDARD, v. SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, J. I., 934 F.3d 478 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Motors LLC , 876 F.3d 182, 185 (6th Cir. 2017). . . .

ODDO, v. BIMBO BAKERIES U. S. A. INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 466 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Schmidt Baking Co., 876 F.3d 596, 601 (4th Cir. 2017) ("The text of the TCA plainly provides that employees . . . the plaintiff], who spent 49% of her days on vehicles less than 10,000 pounds."); see also Schilling, 876 . . .

RILEY, v. FILSON D., 933 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of the Interior , 876 F.3d 1144, 1173 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting United States v. . . .

PATEL, v. FACEBOOK, INC., 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . ESPN, Inc. , 876 F.3d 979, 983 (9th Cir. 2017) ("Violations of the right to privacy have long been actionable . . . knowingly disclosing "personally identifiable information concerning any consumer of such provider." 876 . . . Eichenberger , 876 F.3d at 983 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652B cmt. b); see also Van Patten . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 876, 884 (N.D. Ill. 2019). . . .

C. CHILDRESS, ALDA St. HLAA- StL A v. FOX ASSOCIATES, LLC, C. CHILDRESS, ALDA St. HLAA- StL A v. LLC,, 932 F.3d 1165 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Slay, 875 F.3d 876, 882 (8th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted), and it may rely on reconstructed . . .

SANDHU, LLC, a v. L. KANZLER, Jr. LLC, a, 932 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Friedberg, 713 N.W.2d at 876-77, to support this proposition. . . . Noske, 713 N.W.2d at 876. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MIZUNO,, 933 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 876 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. MAZZULLA, 932 F.3d 1091 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Johnson, 848 F.3d 872, 876 (8th Cir. 2017) (quoting United States v. . . .

ADI WORLDLINK, L. L. C. v. RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 932 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 876 S.W.2 d 132, 133 (Tex. 1994) (explaining that general contract interpretation rules apply to . . .

DOGAN, v. BARAK,, 932 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pena-Irala , 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980), plaintiffs brought an action against a former Paraguayan police . . .

GALEA, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 1212 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Equifax Information Services, LLC, 629 F.3d 876, 889-90 (9th Cir.2010). . . .

MORENO- MARTINEZ, v. P. BARR,, 932 F.3d 461 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Adducci , 912 F.3d 869, 876 (6th Cir. 2018) ("Congress does not suspend the writ [of habeas corpus] when . . .

UNITED STATES v. PINEDA- DUARTE,, 933 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 875, 876 (5th Cir. 2016) (credible threat of violence when defendant pointed gun at customer, threatened . . .

IN RE J. WELSCH,, 602 B.R. 682 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . held that the ex-spouse had violated the stay by "continuing" the contempt proceeding. 445 B.R. at 876 . . .

ALEXIS BAILLY VINEYARD, INC. a LLC, a v. HARRINGTON, s, 931 F.3d 774 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), nevertheless held that the Farm . . .

UNITED STATES v. GALECKI, v., 932 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 876 (4th Cir. 2018) (Ritchie II ). . . .

NOVAK, v. CITY OF PARMA, 932 F.3d 421 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Falwell , 485 U.S. 46, 56-57, 108 S.Ct. 876, 99 L.Ed.2d 41 (1988). It is protected speech. Id. . . . Hustler , 485 U.S. at 50, 108 S.Ct. 876. . . . Id. at 54, 108 S.Ct. 876. . . . Hustler , 485 U.S. at 54, 108 S.Ct. 876. . . . See Hustler , 485 U.S. at 57, 108 S.Ct. 876 ("The Court of Appeals interpreted the jury's finding to . . .

ORTIZ, v. ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 236 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . McCalla, Raymer, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, L.L.C. , 214 F.3d 872, 876 (7th Cir. 2000) ). . . . the letter will increase over time." 817 F.3d at 77 (emphasis added); see also Miller , 214 F.3d at 876 . . .

UNITED STATES v. VARGAS- MOLINA,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 809 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Estrada , 876 F.3d 885, 887 (6th Cir. 2017) (quoting § 1326(d) ). . . . Estrada , 876 F.3d at 887 (citing cases). . . . Estrada , 876 F.3d at 887. . . . See Estrada , 876 F.3d at 887-88 ; cf. United States v. . . . Estrada , 876 F.3d at 888 (citing cases) (holding there is no constitutional right to be informed of . . .

N. J. a v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State , 876 So.2d 618, 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). . . .

IN RE CANNON,, 931 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gutierrez, 876 F.3d 1254, 1255-57 (9th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S. . . .

JENSEN, v. NATROL, LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1100 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 867, 876-77 (N.D. Cal. 2016) ; Racies v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ- SORIANO, a k a a k a, 931 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 312 U.S. 342, 347, 61 S.Ct. 603, 85 L.Ed. 876 (1941) ). . . .

KOALA, v. KHOSLA,, 931 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . FEC , 558 U.S. 310, 352, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (quoting Austin v. . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS a c o L. P., 931 F.3d 237 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . See United States v. 13,255.53 Acres of Land, 158 F.2d 874, 876 (3d Cir. 1946) ("This question of substantive . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. WILLIAMS,, 931 F.3d 570 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Expedia, Inc. , 876 F.3d 296, 302 (7th Cir. 2017). . . .

PRESQUE ISLE COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, v. HIGHMARK HEALTH, f k a f k a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Hosp. , 64 F.3d 869, 876 (3d Cir. 1995). . . .

TRUE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, v. M. AZAR, II,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 666 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Phillips Petroleum Co. , 339 U.S. 667, 671, 70 S.Ct. 876, 94 L.Ed. 1194 (1950) (finding that the Declaratory . . .

IN RE G. QUEEN, Bi- LLC D. LLC, v. D. G., 602 B.R. 60 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Belew (In re Belew ), 588 B.R. 875, 876 (8th Cir. . . .

E. APONTE- RAMOS, v. UNITED STATES, 391 F. Supp. 3d 183 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Gutiérrez, 876 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir. 2017) ; United States v. . . .

FLORES, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lynch , 798 F.3d 876, 881 (9th Cir. 2015) ("[T]he § 1252(a)(2)(C) bar does not apply to the denial of . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. HERMAN,, 930 F.3d 872 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . I fully agree with the panel that "[w]ords should mean something," ante at 876, and I find the following . . . Ante at 876. . . . Carter 's standard that forcible restraint exists when there is no alternative but compliance, ante at 876 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUTIERREZ- RAMIREZ,, 930 F.3d 963 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Littlewind , 595 F.3d 876, 881 (8th Cir. 2010) (internal quotations omitted). . . .

TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, v. EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. v. v. On, 392 F. Supp. 3d 120 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Ctr., Inc., 876 F. Supp. 2d 122, 127 (D. Mass. 2012) ; Legrice v. Harrington, No. . . .

EBBE, v. CONCORDE INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC G. M. a k a M., 392 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Lothian, 532 F.3d 876, 880 & n.2 (D.C. Cir. 2008). . . .

GIBSON, Ca v. SCE GROUP, INC. d b a d b a s,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 876, 881 (S.D.N.Y. 1973). C. . . .

ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, v. VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG, a, 930 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sch. , 876 F.3d 926, 936 (7th Cir. 2017) ; see also Energy Reserves Grp. , 459 U.S. at 412-13, 103 S.Ct . . . Elliott , 876 F.3d at 937 (citing Spannaus , 438 U.S. at 245, 98 S.Ct. 2716 ; U.S. . . .

UNIVERSAL CABLE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a LLC, a v. ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 929 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Durham , 166 F.2d 874, 876 (10th Cir. 1948) (holding that where an insurance policy expressly excluded . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 340, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (rejecting argument that, . . .

S. R. NEHAD K. R. v. N. BROWDER, 929 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Foxworth , 31 F.3d 873, 876 (9th Cir. 1994). . . . Glenn , 673 F.3d at 876 (citing Scott v. Henrich , 39 F.3d 912, 915 (9th Cir. 1994) ). . . .

OVERBEY v. MAYOR OF BALTIMORE UC MPA D. C. s E. W., 930 F.3d 215 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 558 U.S. 310, 339, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) ("The right of citizens to . . . Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 340, 130 S.Ct. 876. . . . Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 339, 130 S.Ct. 876. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DANIELS,, 930 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gordon , 876 F.2d 1121, 1125 (5th Cir. 1989) (citing 21 U.S.C § 841(a)(1) ). . . . Gordon , 876 F.2d at 1125. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIGUEROA- FIGUEROA,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 70 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Thompson, 876 F.2d 1381, 1384 (8th Cir. 1989) (holding that a defendant's refusal to sign a written consent . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOLEYN v. v. v. v., 929 F.3d 932 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Henderson, 908 N.W.2d 868, 876 (Iowa 2018) ; State v. . . .

L. BANKS, v. NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION, 929 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dunn , 268 U.S. 121, 131, 45 S.Ct. 451, 69 L.Ed. 876 (1925) ). . . .

MBI ENERGY SERVICES, v. HOCH, a LLC, a, 929 F.3d 506 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . JBM Envelope Co. , 876 F.3d 1112, 1120 (8th Cir. 2017). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Department of the Interior , 876 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir. 2017) and Presbyterian Church v. . . . claims espousing the same theory under two different causes of action (under the APA and "equitably"). 876 . . . Department of the Interior , 876 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir. 2017), we explained that "a court is foreclosed . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS, 928 F.3d 763 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Winston , 845 F.3d 876, 877 (8th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

TARGET GENERAL MERCHANDISE, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . United States , 733 F.2d 873, 876 (Fed. Cir. 1984). . . . to persuade the court that the contested tariff provision is incorrect, Jarvis Clark , 733 F.2d at 876 . . .

E. D. v. SHARKEY BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC, 928 F.3d 299 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Schroeter , 876 F.3d 424, 450 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Anderson v. . . .

BARGHER, v. WHITE,, 928 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Johnson, 401 F.3d 874, 876 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curium) (PLRA's exhaustion requirements do not apply . . .

MOORE, C. v. THURSTON,, 928 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martin, 876 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2017) (alterations in original) (quoting Teague v. . . . Libertarian Party of Ark., 876 F.3d at 951 (explaining that, in the context of a claim mooted by legislative . . . See Libertarian Party of Ark., 876 F.3d at 952 (declining to address a challenge to a statute amended . . .

IN RE GRAVEL, In In, 601 B.R. 873 (Bankr. Vt. 2019)

. . . Similarly, in In re Brown, 319 B.R. 876 (Bankr. N.D. . . .

IN RE PETTERS COMPANY, INC. LLC PC LLC LLC SPF LLC PL LLC MGC PAC LLC A. BMO v. BMO N. A. M I, 603 B.R. 424 (Bankr. Minn. 2019)

. . . Dist. , 792 F.3d 876, 880 (8th Cir. 2015) ). Warth v. . . .

A. RUCHO, v. COMMON CAUSE, H. v. O., 139 S. Ct. 2484 (U.S. 2019)

. . . See Rucho , 318 F.Supp.3d at 875-876, 894 ; App. 276. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRYOR, 927 F.3d 1042 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Winston, 845 F.3d 876, 878 (8th Cir. 2017), Pryor claims that because the Missouri statute can be satisfied . . .

BILINSKY, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., 928 F.3d 565 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . McLeod Health, Inc. , 914 F.3d 876, 881-82 (4th Cir. 2019), where the Fourth Circuit reversed summary . . . McLeod Health, Inc. , 914 F.3d 876 (4th Cir. 2019) (reversing summary judgment for employer where there . . .

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. FITBIT, INC. USA, U. S. A. JK v. U. S. A., 927 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. , 876 F.3d 1372, 1377-78 (Fed. Cir. 2017) ). . . .

STEMCOR USA INCORPORATED, v. CIA SIDERURGICA DO PARA COSIPAR, v. v. L. L. P., 927 F.3d 906 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . M/V Alaia , 876 F.2d 1168 (5th Cir. 1989), strongly counsels towards recognizing subject matter jurisdiction . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARE, Jr., 385 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Pleitez , 876 F.3d 150, 157 (5th Cir. 2017) (citing Montejo v. . . .

LEFEBURE v. BOEKER, D. D J. Co., 390 F. Supp. 3d 729 (M.D. La. 2019)

. . . Texas Comm'n of Arts , 992 F.Supp. 876, 878-79 (N.D. . . .

D. AUGE, v. FAIRCHILD EQUIPMENT, INC., 388 F. Supp. 3d 1071 (D. Minn. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 868, 876 (D. Minn. 2001) (citing Pershern v. Fiatallis N. . . . Supp. 2d at 876 (citing Pershern , 834 F.2d at 138 ). . . .

IANCU, v. BRUNETTI, 139 S. Ct. 2294 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Falwell , 485 U.S. 46, 56, 108 S.Ct. 876, 99 L.Ed.2d 41 (1988) ("[S]peech that is vulgar, offensive, . . .

The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

Ward v. M/Y Utopia IV

Cooper v. State

Tucker v. LNV Corp.

Mitchell v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

Wade v. McDade

Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh

Dulcio v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency

Hall v. Merola

Windspeed Enter. v. M/V Semi 1

Smith v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

Cases from cite.case.law: