Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 876.16 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 876.16 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 876.16

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 876
CRIMINAL ANARCHY, TREASON, AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 876.16
876.16 Sections 876.11-876.15; exemptions.The following persons are exempted from the provisions of ss. 876.11-876.15:
(1) Any person or persons wearing traditional holiday costumes;
(2) Any person or persons engaged in trades and employment where a mask is worn for the purpose of ensuring the physical safety of the wearer, or because of the nature of the occupation, trade, or profession;
(3) Any person or persons using masks in theatrical productions, including use in Gasparilla celebrations and masquerade balls;
(4) Persons wearing gas masks prescribed in emergency management drills and exercises.
History.s. 6, ch. 26542, 1951; s. 46, ch. 83-334.

F.S. 876.16 on Google Scholar

F.S. 876.16 on Casetext

Amendments to 876.16


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 876.16
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 876.16.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 876.16

Total Results: 7

Nicol v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-10-13

Citation: 939 So. 2d 231, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17011, 2006 WL 2918751

Snippet: was overbroad, and exceptions provided by section 876.16 were not sufficient to cure this fatal overbreadth

Robinson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-12-18

Citation: 393 So. 2d 1076

Snippet: rational basis. The exceptions provided by section 876.16, Florida Statutes (1977), are not sufficient to

Butler v. Allied Dairy Products, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-03-20

Citation: 151 So. 2d 279, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3125

Snippet: these is Lovejoy Company et al. v. Ackis, 153 Fla. 876, 16 So.2d 297, in which, although, we stated that the

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Hawes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-09-14

Citation: 82 So. 2d 731

Snippet: support this holding, Lovejoy v. Ackis, 153 Fla. 876, 16 So.2d 297; Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. Williams

Butler v. Morgan Ex Rel. Harris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1946-01-29

Citation: 24 So. 2d 571, 157 Fla. 1, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 641

Snippet: is decided upon Lovejoy Co. v. Ackis,153 Fla. 876, 16 So.2d 297. See also Sec. 440.09 (1), F.S. '41,

Cullinane v. Crown Can Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-12-07

Citation: 24 So. 2d 5, 156 Fla. 652, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 958

Snippet: rather fully in Lovejoy Company v. Ackis,153 Fla. 876, 16 So.2d 297, the effect of the election of the claimant

Hillyer & Lovan v. Florida Industrial Commission

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-11-07

Citation: 19 So. 2d 838, 155 Fla. 144, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 489

Snippet: case of Lovejoy Co., et al., v. Ackis, 153 Fla. 876,16 So.2d 297, and cases in other jurisdictions are