Florida Statute 901.43 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 901
ARRESTS AND TEMPORARY DETENTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 901.43

901.43 Dissemination of arrest booking photographs.—

(1) Any person or entity engaged in the business of publishing through a publicly accessible print or electronic medium or otherwise disseminating arrest booking photographs of persons who have previously been arrested may not solicit or accept a fee or other form of payment to remove the photographs.

(2) A person whose arrest booking photograph is published or otherwise disseminated, or his or her legal representative, may make a request, in writing, for the removal of an arrest booking photograph to the registered agent of the person or entity who published or otherwise disseminated the photograph. The written request for removal of the arrest booking photograph must be sent by registered mail and include sufficient proof of identification of the person whose arrest booking photograph was published or otherwise disseminated and specific information identifying the arrest booking photograph that the written request is seeking to remove. Within 10 calendar days after receipt of the written request for removal of the arrest booking photograph, the person or entity who published or otherwise disseminated the photograph shall remove the arrest booking photograph without charge and may not republish or otherwise redisseminate such photograph.

(3)(a) The person whose arrest booking photograph was published or otherwise disseminated in the publication or electronic medium may bring a civil action to enjoin the continued publication or dissemination of the photograph if the photograph is not removed within 10 calendar days after receipt of the written request for removal. The court may impose a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for noncompliance with an injunction and shall award reasonable attorney fees and court costs related to the issuance and enforcement of the injunction. Moneys recovered for civil penalties under this paragraph shall be deposited into the General Revenue Fund.

(b) If a person or an entity was required to remove an arrest booking photograph under this section and later republishes or otherwise redisseminates the photograph in the publication or electronic medium, the person whose photograph is republished or redisseminated may bring a civil action to enjoin the continued publication or dissemination of the photograph. The court may impose a civil penalty of $5,000 per day for noncompliance with an injunction and shall award reasonable attorney fees and court costs related to the issuance and enforcement of the injunction. Moneys recovered for civil penalties under this paragraph shall be deposited into the General Revenue Fund.

(4) Refusal to remove an arrest booking photograph after written request has been made or republishing or otherwise redisseminating an arrest booking photograph after a written request to remove such photograph has been made constitutes an unfair or deceptive trade practice in accordance with part II of chapter 501.

(5) This section does not apply to any person or entity that publishes or disseminates information relating to arrest booking photographs unless:

(a) The person or entity solicits or accepts payment to remove the photographs; or

(b) The person’s or entity’s primary business model is the publishing and disseminating of arrest booking photographs for a commercial purpose or pecuniary gain.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2017-130; s. 1, ch. 2021-132.

F.S. 901.43 on Google Scholar

F.S. 901.43 on Casetext

Amendments to 901.43

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 901.43

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 901.43.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 901.43

Total Results: 14

Spey v. Hayes

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-11-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 406 So. 2d 1176

Snippet: 1978);[3]Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127 (1925); Daniel v. May, 143 So.2d 536

City of Miami v. St. Joe Paper Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-10-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 364 So. 2d 439

Snippet: easements. See Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127 (1925). We next consider the question

Voight v. Harbour Heights Improvement Association

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-02-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 218 So. 2d 803

Snippet: Moore v. Stevens, 1925, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127; Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc., Fla.App

Belle Terre Ass'n v. Brosch

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-12-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 216 So. 2d 462, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4697

Snippet: governed by Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127 (1925), and Ballinger v. Smith, 54

Matthews v. Olson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 212 So. 2d 357, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5315

Snippet: restriction. Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127 (1925); Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc.,

Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-03-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 186 So. 2d 302

Snippet: ; Moore v. Stevens, 1925, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127. Moore v. Stevens is strongly analogous

Thompson v. Squibb

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-01-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 183 So. 2d 30

Snippet: See also Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127. There is no ambiguity in the expression

Batman v. Creighton

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-03-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 101 So. 2d 587

Snippet: So. 364; Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127; Pearson v. Stafford, 88 N.J. Eq. 385

Board of Public Instruction v. Town of Bay Harbor I.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1955-04-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 81 So. 2d 637

Snippet: property. See Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127, and the authorities there cited.

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Watson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1953-04-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 65 So. 2d 732

Snippet: transaction. Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127. As stated in Heisler *734 v. Marceau

Ballinger v. Smith

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1951-10-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 54 So. 2d 433

Snippet: unreasonable. Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127; Heisler v. Marceau, 95 Fla. 135, 116…So. 364; Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901, 43 A.L.R. 1127; Heisler v. Marceau, 95 Fla. 135, 116

Osius v. Barton

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-04-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 109 Fla. 556, 147 So. 862

Snippet: ; Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 Sou. Rep. 901, 43 A. L. R. 1127; Mercer v. Kenyton, 99 Fla. 914,

Osius v. Barton

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-04-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 109 Fla. 558, 147 So. 862

Snippet: 364; Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879,106 Sou. Rep. 901, 43 A. L. R. 1127; Mercer v. Kenyton, 99 Fla. 914,127

Mercer v. Keynton

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1930-04-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 127 So. 859, 99 Fla. 914

Snippet: 364; Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. R. 901, 43 A. L. R. 1127; Stephl v. Moore, 94 Fla. 313, 114