Syfert Injury Law Firm

Government Employees Insurance Company v. Glassco Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-25

Snippet: work will exceed $100 to the customer.” § 559.905(1), Fla. Stat. And the obligations at issue in this

FGAP INVESTMENT CORP v. A1 BODY AND GLASS OF CORAL SPRINGS, LLC and PABLO HENAO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-08-04

Snippet: estimate if the repair work will exceed $100. § 559.905(1), Fla. Stat. (2019). “If the cost of repair work

Safari Tours v. Pasco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-22

Citation: 255 So. 3d 415

Snippet: failed to substantially comply with section 559.905(1)(n) of Florida’s Motor Vehicle Repair Act. We otherwise

Spa Creek Servs., LLC v. S.W. Cole, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-27

Citation: 239 So. 3d 730

Snippet: not considered to be transacting business. §§ 605.0905(1)(a), 607.1501(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). Neither

Siam Motors, Inc. v. Spivey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-02-12

Citation: 136 So. 3d 692, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1823, 2014 WL 538674

Snippet: waived any written estimate required by section 559.905(1) because he delivered the car to Siam Motors when

State v. Contreras

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-13

Citation: 979 So. 2d 896, 2008 WL 657867

Snippet: Child Protection Teams. Contreras, 910 So.2d at 905.[1] The Fourth District noted that other states with

Johnson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-07-13

Citation: 660 So. 2d 648, 1995 WL 410693

Snippet: serve.[13] Johnson further argues that section 905.01(2), Florida Statutes (1987), required that only

Nelms v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-12

Citation: 596 So. 2d 441, 1992 WL 45025

Snippet: area as the petit jury in violation of section 905.01(1), Florida Statutes (1981) (provisions of law

Thompson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-06-14

Citation: 565 So. 2d 1311, 1990 WL 82924

Snippet: grand jury of 23 members, in violation of section 905.01(1) of the Florida Statutes (1987), and in violation

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1990-02-09

Snippet: operating fewer than five motor vehicles.2 Section 559.905(1), F.S., provides that when a customer requests a

Walker v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVS., DIST. I, ESCAMBIA CTY.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-10-19

Citation: 533 So. 2d 836, 1988 WL 107401

Snippet: of Health and Human Services — 20 C.F.R. § 416.905.[1] In evaluating claims for MNP benefits, HRS utilizes

Paterson v. Brafman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-09-06

Citation: 530 So. 2d 499, 1988 WL 91164

Snippet: judgment lien. See also 6A Powell on Real Property § 905[1] (1987) (citing Fisher). These cases require reversal

Osteen v. Morris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-01-23

Citation: 481 So. 2d 1287, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 259

Snippet: of the shop's failure to comply with section 559.905(1) through (4), inclusive, a consumer act known as

Lucas Truck Service Co. v. Hargrove

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-20

Citation: 443 So. 2d 260, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25219

Snippet: which it undertook this repair work. Section 559.905(1), subparagraphs (a)-(n), inclusive, enumerates the

State v. Digman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-03-20

Citation: 294 So. 2d 325

Snippet: by this act differs from that provided by F.S. § 905.01(1), F.S.A. (which incorporates F.S. Ch. 40, F.S

State ex rel. Gerstein v. Baker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-02-05

Citation: 243 So. 2d 464, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431

Snippet: Constitution, Art. V, § 9(5) and §§ 32.18; 40.36; 905.01(2); 905.21, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Rule 1.140(a) (2)

State ex rel. Retchin v. Turner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-12-10

Citation: 243 So. 2d 168, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5308

Snippet: with directions to discharge the defendant under § 905.01(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A, and said: “Our Supreme Court

Yoo Kun Wha v. Kelly

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-03-27

Citation: 154 So. 2d 161

Snippet: in Florida were those embodied in Section *163 905.01 Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides: "Every

State ex rel. Ashmann v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-02-22

Citation: 151 So. 2d 437

Snippet: twenty-three members in-. Dade County and under Section 905.01, F. S.A., it should have consisted of not more-than

Reed v. Fain

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-10-19

Citation: 145 So. 2d 858

Snippet: 88. [3] Moyer v. Clark, Fla. 1954, 72 So.2d 905. [1] Wright v. Blocker, 144 Fla. 428, 198 So. 88.