Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 905.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 905.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 905.02

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 905
GRAND JURY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 905.02
905.02 Who may challenge.The state or a person who has been held to answer may challenge the panel or individual grand jurors.
History.s. 81, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(81); s. 42, ch. 70-339.

F.S. 905.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 905.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 905.02


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 905.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 905.02.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 905.02

Total Results: 20

Government Employees Insurance Company v. Glassco Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-25

Snippet: option to obtain a written estimate, see § 559.905(2), Fla. Stat.; (3) failing to provide the written

FGAP INVESTMENT CORP v. A1 BODY AND GLASS OF CORAL SPRINGS, LLC and PABLO HENAO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-08-04

Snippet: or her entitlement to a written estimate. § 559.905(2), Fla. Stat. (2019). On the authorization form

Q.H. c/o AMY HILL v. SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH PLAN, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-07

Snippet: The hearing officer also stated that section 409.905(2), Florida Statutes, limits EPSDT services with a

Q.H. c/o AMY HILL v. SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH PLAN, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-07

Snippet: The hearing officer also stated that section 409.905(2), Florida Statutes, limits EPSDT services with a

Q.H. c/o AMY HILL v. SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH PLAN, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-07

Snippet: The hearing officer also stated that section 409.905(2), Florida Statutes, limits EPSDT services with a

Wyche v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-22

Citation: 170 So. 3d 898, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11042, 2015 WL 4464474

Snippet: after the commission of, a forcible felony; or *905(2) -Initially provokes the use of force against himself

I.b. ex rel. R.B. v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-02-29

Citation: 87 So. 3d 6, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3162, 2012 WL 637911

Snippet: covered under the State plan.” Id. See also § 409.905(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). This Court ordered the department

Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Dishkin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-07-06

Citation: 81 So. 3d 437, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10550, 2011 WL 3311742

Snippet: sure. When I was checking out. . Section 559.905(2), Florida Statutes (2006), directs that if the repair

Cook ex rel. Cook v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities District: 02 Gadsden Unit: APD

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-10-26

Citation: 967 So. 2d 1002, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16856

Snippet: Services (EPSDT), a mandatory Medicaid service. § 409.905(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). The Agency must provide all

Goodman v. Tectonics Unlimited, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-11-26

Citation: 861 So. 2d 485, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18779, 2003 WL 22922456

Snippet: court awarded an appellate attorney’s fee of $13,905.02. Appellants’ main argument is that “a party cannot

State v. Meisner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-04-09

Citation: 692 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3221, 1997 WL 163009

Snippet: $279,500.00 having a remaining balance of $157,905.02 plus accrued interest as well as the payments on

Duval Asphalt Products, Inc. v. E. Vaughn Rivers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-06-11

Citation: 620 So. 2d 1043, 1993 WL 196338

Snippet: the days of "remoteness from privity." See § 627.0905(2), Fla. Stat. (1961). Under section 627.756, attorney

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-04-01

Snippet: Florida Flood Control District, 178 So.2d 900, 905 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1965), the district court after a

Antone v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-27

Citation: 382 So. 2d 1205

Snippet: are necessary to sustain such a challenge. See §§ 905.02-.06, Fla. Stat. (1977). He also contends that the

TRAVELERS INDEM. COMPANY v. Howell & King, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-30

Citation: 336 So. 2d 1, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976

Snippet: bonding company because of F.S.A. § 627.0905(2)". (§ 627.0905(2) is the predecessor of § 627.756 cited

Seay v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-11-01

Citation: 286 So. 2d 532

Snippet: grand jury panel afforded them under Fla. Stat. §§ 905.02, 905.03 and 905.04, F.S.A.[5] They chose not to

Midway Shopping Mall, Inc. v. Corky Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-02-08

Citation: 257 So. 2d 905

Snippet: against a bonding company because of F.S.A. § 627.0905(2)[1]. The mechanic's lien statute provides in F

Eder Instrument Co. v. Allen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-10-26

Citation: 253 So. 2d 902

Snippet: personally on the persons or foreign corporations. *905 "(2) If a foreign corporation has a resident agent

Joseph v. Houdaille-Duval-Wright Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-07-30

Citation: 213 So. 2d 3, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5074

Snippet: appeal is whether or not the provisions of § *4627.0905 (2)1 limit reasonable attorney’s fees provided for

Martin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-01-12

Citation: 194 So. 2d 8, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200

Snippet: is foreclosed by section 905.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which provides : f‘905.02 WHO MAY CHALLENGE— The state