Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 910.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 910.11 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 910.11

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 910
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 910.11
910.11 Conviction or acquittal bar to prosecution.
(1) No person shall be held to answer on a second indictment, information, or affidavit for an offense for which the person has been acquitted. The acquittal shall be a bar to a subsequent prosecution for the same offense, notwithstanding any defect in the form or circumstances of the indictment, information, or affidavit.
(2) When a person may be tried for an offense in two or more counties, a conviction or acquittal in one county shall be a bar to prosecution for the same offense in another county.
History.s. 170, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(177); s. 81, ch. 70-339; s. 1517, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 910.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 910.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 910.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 910.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 910.11.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 910.11

Total Results: 20

Raymond Ortega v. Burger King Corporation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-19

Snippet: v. Infrastructure Corp. of Am., 113 So. 3d 904, 910-11 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (“The general rule that a landowner

Universal Insurance Company of North America v. Sunset 102 Office Park Condominium Association, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-13

Snippet: v. Green By and Through Swan, 468 So. 2d 908, 910-11 (Fla. 1985) (“Unless the improper argument constitutes

DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES v. MICHELET PIERRE AND STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-15

Snippet: of Child. & Fams. v. Musa, 321 So. 3d 908, 910-11 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (concluding that the trial court

LUIS HOLLIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-09

Snippet: 237 So. 3d at 403 (quoting Johnson, 226 So. 3d at 910–11). “[O]ur authority to grant a writ of habeas

CHRISTOPHER A. STRACHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-02

Snippet: Instructions in Criminal Cases, 257 So. 3d 908, 910-11 (Fla. 2018) (approving proposed amendments to Fla

Brandon L. Eady v. State of Florida, Agency For Health Care Administration

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-09-12

Snippet: by a statutory formula set forth in section 409.910(11)(f), Florida Statutes. However, the paragraph (11)(f)

John Gray v. Agency for Health Care Administration

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-09-03

Snippet: provided and any lien pursuant thereto. § 409.910(11)(e), Fla. Stat. (2016) (emphasis added). However

Ammar Al Batha, as Personal etc. v. State of Florida, Agency for Health Care etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-14

Citation: 263 So. 3d 817

Snippet: 910(17)(b) clearly limits who may contest § 409.910(11)(f)-calculated amounts: “A recipient may contest

David P. Trotti v. Rick Scott, Governor

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-26

Citation: 271 So. 3d 904

Snippet: 305 So.2d 777 (Fla. 1974). See dissenting op. at 910-11 (Quince, J.). We should not condone this practice

Robert A. Koroly v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-16

Citation: 257 So. 3d 1096

Snippet: See id. at 697; Valle v. Moore, 837 So. 2d 905, 910-11 (Fla. 2002). To prove the first prong, the appellant

Maria Isabel Giraldo v. Agency for Health Care Administration

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-05

Citation: 248 So. 3d 53

Snippet: pending. Using the formula outlined in section 409.910(11)(f), Florida Statutes (2015), AHCA calculated the

Sierra Club v. Julie Imanuel Brown, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-17

Citation: 243 So. 3d 903

Snippet: interest finding. See supra pp. 910-11. That analogy, however, does not impose an affirmative

PHILLIPS PIERRE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-07

Citation: 237 So. 3d 402

Snippet: uniformity in the decisions of this court. Id. at 910-11 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)

Delgado v. Agency for Health Care Admin.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-01-26

Citation: 237 So. 3d 432

Snippet: Based on the formula set forth in section 409.910(11)(f), Florida Statutes (2016), AHCA calculated the

Willoughby v. Agency for Health Care Administration

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-10

Citation: 212 So. 3d 516, 2017 WL 945532, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3214

Snippet: So.3d 139, 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (citing § 409.910(11)(e), (f)), review denied, No. SC16-930, 2016 WL

Gretna Racing, LLC v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-02

Citation: 178 So. 3d 15

Snippet: implications.’ ” Hooks v. Quaintance, 71 So.3d 908, 910-11 (Fla. 1st DcA 2011) (citations omitted). The Department’s

Pro Finish, Inc. v. Estate of All American Trailer Manufacturers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-08-03

Citation: 204 So. 3d 505, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11731

Snippet: circuit court.” Moecker v. Antoine, 845 So.2d 904, 910-11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Subsection (2) requires that

Goheagan v. Perkins

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-20

Citation: 197 So. 3d 112, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11106, 2016 WL 3911483

Snippet: own name ... as lienholder.” *117§ 409.910(11). Section 409.910(11)® further provides: ... - [I]n the event

Gil Camacho v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-18

Citation: 192 So. 3d 568, 2016 WL 2894119, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7660

Snippet: evidence at trial.” Contreras, 979 So.2d at 910-11. See also Vilseis v. State, 117 So.3d

Vanguard Car Rental USA, LLC v. Suttles

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-27

Citation: 190 So. 3d 672, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6338, 2016 WL 1658764

Snippet: ’ ”) (quoting § 768.79(7)); Molnar, 79 So.3d at 910-11 (same, quoting Dvorak, 663 So.2d at 612). There