Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 918 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 918 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 918

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 918
CONDUCT OF TRIAL
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 918
CHAPTER 918
CONDUCT OF TRIAL
918.015 Right to speedy trial.
918.0155 Expeditious disposition of particular criminal cases involving a child under age 16.
918.0157 Right to trial by jury.
918.016 Trial of remaining defendants after grant of continuance to others.
918.03 Procedure when offense committed outside state.
918.04 Procedure when offense committed in another county.
918.05 View by jury.
918.06 Separation and detention of jurors; admonition by court.
918.07 Admonition to officer in charge of jurors.
918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions.
918.12 Tampering with jurors.
918.13 Tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.
918.16 Sex offenses; testimony of person under age 16 or who has an intellectual disability; testimony of victim; courtroom cleared; exceptions.
918.19 Closing argument.
918.015 Right to speedy trial.
(1) In all criminal prosecutions the state and the defendant shall each have the right to a speedy trial.
(2) The Supreme Court shall, by rule of said court, provide procedures through which the right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by subsection (1) and by s. 16, Art. I of the State Constitution, shall be realized.
History.s. 195, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(202); s. 6, ch. 71-1(B).
Note.Former s. 916.01.
918.0155 Expeditious disposition of particular criminal cases involving a child under age 16.Every criminal case prosecuted under chapter 782, chapter 784, chapter 787, chapter 794, chapter 796, chapter 800, chapter 827, or chapter 847 which involves the abuse of a child or unlawful sexual contact or acts performed in the presence of, with, or upon a child under the age of 16 shall be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible.
History.s. 1, ch. 85-53; s. 23, ch. 2010-117.
918.0157 Right to trial by jury.In each prosecution for a violation of a state law or a municipal or county ordinance punishable by imprisonment, the defendant shall have, upon demand, the right to a trial by an impartial jury in the county where the offense was committed, except as to any such prosecution for a violation punishable for a term of imprisonment of 6 months or less, if at the time the case is set for trial the court announces that in the event of conviction of the crime as charged or of any lesser included offense a sentence of imprisonment will not be imposed and the defendant will not be adjudicated guilty, unless a right to trial by jury for such offense is guaranteed under the State or Federal Constitution.
History.s. 1, ch. 86-115.
918.016 Trial of remaining defendants after grant of continuance to others.When a continuance is granted to one or more of several defendants, the court may proceed with the trial of the defendants who have not been granted a continuance.
History.s. 202, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(210); s. 110, ch. 70-339.
Note.Former s. 916.09.
918.03 Procedure when offense committed outside state.When a court determines that it does not have jurisdiction because the offense charged was committed outside this state, the court may discharge the defendant or direct the clerk to communicate the location of the defendant to the chief executive of the state, territory, or district where the offense was committed. The court may commit the defendant to custody or admit him or her to bail for a reasonable period of time to await a requisition for his or her extradition. If a requisition is not received within the time set by the court, the defendant shall be discharged. If the defendant has been admitted to bail, the court shall order the bond canceled and any deposit of money or bonds returned.
History.s. 208, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(216); s. 112, ch. 70-339; s. 1536, ch. 97-102.
918.04 Procedure when offense committed in another county.When a court determines that it does not have jurisdiction because the offense charged was committed in another county of this state, the defendant shall be committed to custody or admitted to bail for a reasonable time to await a warrant for his or her arrest from the proper county. The clerk shall notify the prosecuting attorney of the proper county of the location of the defendant. If the defendant is not arrested on a warrant from the proper county within the time set by the court, he or she shall be discharged. If the defendant has been admitted to bail, the court shall order the bond canceled and any deposit of money or bonds returned.
History.s. 209, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(217); s. 113, ch. 70-339; s. 1537, ch. 97-102.
918.05 View by jury.When a court determines that it is proper for the jury to view a place where the offense may have been committed or other material events may have occurred, it may order the jury to be conducted in a body to the place, in custody of a proper officer. The court shall admonish the officer that no person, including the officer, shall be allowed to communicate with the jury about any subject connected with the trial. The jury shall be returned to the courtroom in accordance with the directions of the court. The judge and defendant, unless the defendant absents himself or herself without permission of court, shall be present, and the prosecuting attorney and defense counsel may be present at the view.
History.s. 210, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(218); s. 114, ch. 70-339; s. 1538, ch. 97-102.
918.06 Separation and detention of jurors; admonition by court.The court shall admonish the jury that it is their duty not to converse among themselves or with anyone else on a subject connected with the trial or to form or express an opinion on a subject connected with the trial until the cause is submitted to them. When the jurors leave the jury box, the court may direct that the jury be kept together in the charge of a proper officer or allow them to separate. If the court permits the jurors to separate, it shall admonish them not to view the place where the offense appears to have been committed.
History.s. 211, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(219); s. 115, ch. 70-339.
918.07 Admonition to officer in charge of jurors.When the jury is committed to the charge of an officer, the officer shall be admonished by the court to keep the jurors together in the place specified and not to permit any person to communicate with them on any subject except with the permission of the court given in open court in the presence of the defendant or the defendant’s counsel. The officer shall not communicate with the jurors on any subject connected with the trial and shall return the jurors to court as directed by the court.
History.s. 212, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(220); s. 116, ch. 70-339; s. 1539, ch. 97-102.
918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions.
(1) At the conclusion of argument of counsel, the court shall charge the jury. The charge shall be only on the law of the case and must include the penalty for the offense for which the accused is being charged.
(2) All charges to the jury shall be delivered orally and shall be taken by the court reporter, transcribed, and filed.
(3) At or after the close of the evidence, a party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as stated in the requests. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action on the requests before their arguments to the jury.
History.s. 215, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(223); s. 1, ch. 22775, 1945; s. 117, ch. 70-339.
918.12 Tampering with jurors.Any person who influences the judgment or decision of any grand or petit juror on any matter, question, cause, or proceeding which may be pending, or which may by law be brought, before him or her as such juror, with intent to obstruct the administration of justice, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 1, ch. 72-315; s. 1540, ch. 97-102.
918.13 Tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.
(1) It is unlawful for any person, knowing that a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation by a duly constituted prosecuting authority, law enforcement agency, grand jury, or legislative committee of this state is pending or is about to be instituted, to:
(a) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or other item with the purpose to impair its verity or availability in such proceeding or investigation; or
(b) Make, present, or use any record, document, or other item, knowing it to be false.
(2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a person who violates subsection (1) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) A person who violates subsection (1) relating to a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation that relates to a capital felony commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 2, ch. 72-315; s. 1, ch. 2022-84.
918.16 Sex offenses; testimony of person under age 16 or who has an intellectual disability; testimony of victim; courtroom cleared; exceptions.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), in the trial of any case, civil or criminal, if any person under the age of 16 or any person with an intellectual disability as defined in s. 393.063 is testifying concerning any sex offense, the court shall clear the courtroom of all persons except parties to the cause and their immediate families or guardians, attorneys and their secretaries, officers of the court, jurors, newspaper reporters or broadcasters, court reporters, and, at the request of the victim, victim or witness advocates designated by the state attorney’s office.
(2) If the victim of a sex offense is testifying concerning that offense in any civil or criminal trial, the court shall clear the courtroom of all persons upon the request of the victim, regardless of the victim’s age or mental capacity, except that parties to the cause and their immediate families or guardians, attorneys and their secretaries, officers of the court, jurors, newspaper reporters or broadcasters, court reporters, and, at the request of the victim, victim or witness advocates designated by the state attorney may remain in the courtroom.
History.s. 28, ch. 77-312; s. 5, ch. 90-211; s. 26, ch. 94-154; s. 109, ch. 99-3; s. 1, ch. 99-157; s. 8, ch. 2000-338; s. 96, ch. 2004-267; s. 37, ch. 2013-162.
918.19 Closing argument.As provided in the common law, in criminal prosecutions after the closing of evidence:
(1) The prosecuting attorney shall open the closing arguments.
(2) The accused or the attorney for the accused may reply.
(3) The prosecuting attorney may reply in rebuttal.

The method set forth in this section shall control unless the Supreme Court determines it is procedural and issues a substitute rule of criminal procedure.

History.s. 1, ch. 2006-96.

F.S. 918 on Google Scholar

F.S. 918 on Casetext

Amendments to 918


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 918
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S918.12 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - TAMPER WITH JUROR - F: T
S918.13 - EVIDENCE-DESTROYING - RENUMBERED SEE REC # 8703 - F: T
S918.13 1a - EVIDENCE-DESTROYING - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9577 - F: T
S918.13 1a - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - TAMPER W EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDING - F: T
S918.13 1a - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - TAMPER EVIDENCE IN CAPITAL FEL CRIM PROCEEDING - F: S
S918.13 1b - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9579 - F: T
S918.13 1b - FRAUD - FABRICATE/USE FALSE EVIDENCE IN CRIM ROCEEDING - F: T
S918.13 1b - FRAUD - FABRICATE/USE FALSE EVIDENCE CAP FEL CRIM PROC - F: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 918

Total Results: 20

Sudano v. Collier County Sheriff's Office

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: ; see also City of Tavares v. Harper, 230 So. 3d 918, 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“[T]o qualify for the presumption

Evans, Evans v. Gulf Landings Association, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: testified that as of July 1, 2022, the Evanses owed $7,918 for the HOA to maintain the drainage easement.7

Colvin Cenac v. Franckline Francois

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-23T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: require reversal.”); Pierre v. Bueven, 276 So. 3d 917, 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Because there is no transcript

Robert Alan McCartney v. the State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Constitution and fortified by Florida Statute. See § 918.015(1)–(2), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“In all criminal

LAD Commercial, LLC v. Eagle Trace at Vero Beach Homeowners' Association, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Atchison v. Hulse, 107 Cal.App. 640, 290 P.916, 918 (1930); and then citing Annot., Limitations Compensation

Anthony J. Akins v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-13T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: dismissed with prejudice. See Richardson v. State, 918 So. 2d 999, 1002–03 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). PETITIONER

Cliff Smith v. the State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: . 3d 977, 989 (Fla. 2017); Richardson v. State, 918 So. 2d 999, 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Thomas v.

Mark Kinchla, Individually and Mark 48, LLC v. Ran Investments, LLC, Kilgore Properties, LLC, Nanlann, Inc., Robert Pola, Newton Corner Condominium

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-06T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Life Cmty. Church of CMA, Inc., 303 So. 3d 916, 918-25 (Fla. 2020). It found that Davis foreclosed the

Daymi Martinez v. Roads Point Townhomes, Inc., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Max Corp. v. Cane A. Sucre, Inc., 905 So. 2d 916, 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The ‘prevailing party’, for

HUTCHINS v. SCT TRADING, LLC, 8831 W. HILLSBOROUGH AVE, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Little Arch Creek Props., Inc., 675 So. 2d 915, 916, 918 (Fla. 1996) (rejecting the claim that a lis pendens

Bing v. Alachua County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Park Condo Association v Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912, 918 (Fla. 1985), reiterated the rule at common law that

Michael Donovan v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: violence if released. We affirm. Section 394.918 provides that a committed person, such as Donovan… the facility where the person is housed.” § 394.918(1)–(2), Fla. Stat. (2021). Thereafter, the trial …in acts of sexual violence if discharged.” § 394.918(3). “If the court determines that there is probable…time of the limited hearing in Holder, section 394.918 did not expressly authorize the state to present … trial court to weigh evidence. Section 394.918(3) now provides that “[b]oth the petitioner and the

David L. Faries v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-23T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 5D2024-1392 L.T. Case No. 2003-CF-000918 ____________________________

Maria P. Albo v. Carlos Martell

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Purdue v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 259 So. 3d 918, 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)). Pursuant to Florida

Brian Gelish v. The State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 394.918(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“The court shall hold a limited…court reviews whether a trial court’s section 394.918(3) probable cause determination is supported by competent…DCA 2017) (holding that, pursuant to section 394.918(3), the trial court may weigh and consider competing

Pinellas County, Florida v. Gary Joiner, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-06-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: ; Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. City of Gainesville, 918 So. 2d 250, 255 (Fla. 2005); Canaveral Port Auth… immunity or exemption.” Fla. Dep’t of Revenue, 918 So. 2d at 255. Immunity is not dependent on any

NOONAN v. OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Appellee. No. 2D2023-0918 June 21, 2024 … 2 2023-0918 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Arthur Vaughn Harris v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-18T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: habeas corpus is dismissed. See Richardson v. State, 918 So. 2d 999, 1002-03 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). PETITION

Kathleen Jennings, the Attorney General of the State of Delaware v. Hugh M. Durden, John S. Lord, Thomas G. Kuntz, Terri Kelly, Geoffrey M. Rogers, and Winfred L. Thornton, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: statute is explicit and clear in that respect.” Id. at 918. Had the Legislature intended to recede from Gebelein… (emphasis added); see also Gallagher v. Dupont, 918 So. 2d 342, 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (same). Likewise

Frank Carn v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-22T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: __________ Case No. 5D2024-0918 LT Case No. 2006-CF-01602-C …______ 2 2024-0918 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp