Florida Statute 924.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 924
CRIMINAL APPEALS AND COLLATERAL REVIEW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 924.06

924.06 Appeal by defendant.—

(1) A defendant may appeal from:

(a) A final judgment of conviction when probation has not been granted under chapter 948, except as provided in subsection (3);

(b) An order granting probation under chapter 948;

(d) A sentence, on the ground that it is illegal; or

(e) A sentence imposed under s. 921.0024 of the Criminal Punishment Code which exceeds the statutory maximum penalty provided in s. 775.082 for an offense at conviction, or the consecutive statutory maximums for offenses at conviction, unless otherwise provided by law.

(2) An appeal of an order granting probation shall proceed in the same manner and have the same effect as an appeal of a judgment of conviction. An appeal of an order revoking probation may review only proceedings after the order of probation. If a judgment of conviction preceded an order of probation, the defendant may appeal from the order or the judgment or both.

(3) A defendant who pleads guilty with no express reservation of the right to appeal a legally dispositive issue, or a defendant who pleads nolo contendere with no express reservation of the right to appeal a legally dispositive issue, shall have no right to a direct appeal.

History.—s. 285, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(295); s. 22, ch. 20519, 1941; s. 3, ch. 59-130; s. 147, ch. 70-339; s. 7, ch. 76-274; s. 3, ch. 83-87; s. 6, ch. 93-406; s. 5, ch. 96-248; s. 27, ch. 97-194; s. 13, ch. 98-204.

F.S. 924.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 924.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 924.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 924.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 924.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 924.06

Total Results: 20

Frank Leija Moreno v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-13T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: reserved and legally dispositive. §§ 924.051(4); 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2020). Moreno did not reserve any

Daniel Kandler v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-12-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: appeal. Consequently, we summarily affirm. See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing that “[a] defendant

MATTHEW SYVERSON vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-10-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: issue, he has no right to a direct appeal. See § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2022). Accordingly, we affirm the

JILLIAN SCHAEFER vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: dispositive issue has no right to a direct appeal. §§ 924.06(3), .051(4), Fla. Stat. (2021). Schaefer did not

State of Florida v. Vernson Edward Dortch

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2021-05-20T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: collateral attack.” Ch. 76-274, § 7, Laws of Fla.; § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1976). We upheld the statute

ERIC WURTZEL v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-12-22T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: however, our review is expressly limited by section 924.06(2) of the Florida Statutes, which, in relevant…only proceedings after the order of probation.” § 924.06(2), Fla. Stat. (2020) (emphasis added). We therefore… special condition’s validity, because section 924.06(2) limits the scope of our review of a probation…implement the special condition. Section 924.06(2)’s restraint on appellate review has an ethical…court’s April 4, 2019 probation order. Section 924.06(2) prevents our review of Wurtzel’s challenge.

RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: LPS] or as enumerated in s. 924.06(1)." (emphasis added)), § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("

Champagne v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 269 So. 3d 629

Snippet: LPS] or as enumerated in s. 924.06(1)." (emphasis added) ), § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("

Champagne v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 269 So. 3d 629

Snippet: LPS] or as enumerated in s. 924.06(1)." (emphasis added) ), § 924.06(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("

Edward Lewis v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-30T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: ruling after pleading guilty or nolo contendere. § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2016) (“A defendant who pleads

Michael v. Grimes v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 208 So. 3d 323, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 194

Snippet: . THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR. 1 . See § 924.06 (3), Fla. Stat. (2016) ("A defendant who pleads

Charles v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 204 So. 3d 63, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15940

Snippet: which exceeds the statutory maximum penalty. § 924.06(l)(d), (e), Fla. Stat. (2015). The legislature

Williams v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 194 So. 3d 511, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8778, 2016 WL 3186010

Snippet: the case. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat (2015). 1 In these circumstances

Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 3d 941, 2016 WL 3065576, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8352

Snippet: sentencing principles, will effectively end-run section 924.06(l)(d) and (e), Florida Statutes (2015). Those sections…conviction, unless otherwise provided by law. § 924.06(l)(d)-(e), Fla. Stat. (2015). Such an end-run ignores

John Henry Fogarty v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-12-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 158 So. 3d 669, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20456

Snippet: Jorquera, this court held that section 924.06(1), Florida Statutes, allowing appeals from illegal

Little v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-12-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 152 So. 3d 770, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19795, 2014 WL 6832228

Snippet: So.2d 1250, 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citing § 924.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2003); Patterson v. State, 796

Barnhill v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 140 So. 3d 1055, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8640, 2014 WL 2536826

Snippet: .2d 849 (Fla.2002). There, we held that section 924.06(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), did not give…error we were empowered to correct under section 924.06(1). Id. at 574. Although the supreme court denied…authorized by chapter 921.” Ch. 96-248, § 5, at 955; § 924.06(d), (e), Fla. Stat. As reflected in the 1996 court

Hall v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-07-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 117 So. 3d 478, 2013 WL 3778916, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11509

Snippet: Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or section 924.06, Florida Statutes. It is not *479an order modifying

Smith v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 81 So. 3d 590, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3353, 2012 WL 669304

Snippet: plea, we dismiss the appeal. See §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2

Pamphile v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-06-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 65 So. 3d 107, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10177, 2011 WL 2555398

Snippet: particularity the point of law being reserved.”); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“[A] defendant who pleads