Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 924.066 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 924.066 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 924.066

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 924
CRIMINAL APPEALS AND COLLATERAL REVIEW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 924.066
924.066 Collateral relief.
(1) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this chapter, a prisoner in custody may seek relief based upon claims that the judgment of conviction or sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or law of the United States or the State of Florida.
(2) Either the state or a prisoner in custody may obtain review in the next higher state court of a trial court’s adverse ruling granting or denying collateral relief. The state may obtain review of any trial court ruling that fails to enforce a procedural bar.
(3) A person in a noncapital case who is seeking collateral review under this chapter has no right to a court-appointed lawyer.
History.s. 6, ch. 96-248.

F.S. 924.066 on Google Scholar

F.S. 924.066 on Casetext

Amendments to 924.066


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 924.066
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 924.066.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 924.066

Total Results: 18

Matthew Dettle v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-10-24T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: With that consideration in mind, both section 924.066, Florida Statutes (2024), and Florida Rule of

STATE V. JENKINS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-12T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2022) the order insofar as it granted

Darryl Len Morgan v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-11-03T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: question 3. The dissent relies on section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (2017), a statutory provision…any event, the dissent’s assertion that section 924.066(2) provides the requisite statutory “authority”…the order at issue is a nonfinal order, section 924.066(2) is not relevant. See art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla.…this case is set forth in rule 9.140 and section 924.066, Florida Statutes (2017). Specifically, rule… this instance. The plain language of section 924.066(2) provides: “Either the state or a prisoner in

State of Florida v. Shelton Jackson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 28 (Fla. 2004). The plain language of sections 924.066 and 924.07, Florida Statutes (2018), does not authorize…as orders granting postconviction relief. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2018); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)

Baker v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-09-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 210 So. 3d 140, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14119

Snippet: summary postconviction proceedings. See § 924.066(3), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“A person in a noncapital

Beliveau v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-08-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 144 So. 3d 634, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12215, 2014 WL 3882457

Snippet: statutory or constitutional right. See § 924.066(3), Fla. Stat. (2018); Gantt, 714 So

Jordan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 81 So. 3d 595, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2012 WL 694757

Snippet: motion for rehearing under rule 3.800(b)(1)(B)); § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (authorizing both the state and

Hogan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 12 So. 3d 835, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957, 2009 WL 1491445

Snippet: failed to appeal the 2000 and 2002 orders. Section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (2000, 2002), provides, "

Mann v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-09-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 937 So. 2d 722

Snippet: counsel of record." Finally, section *727 924.066(3), Florida Statutes (2005), provides: "A

State v. Vasquez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-01-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 918 So. 2d 1016, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 900, 2006 WL 197379

Snippet: Vasquez’s motion for postconviction relief. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). In that order, the trial

State v. Chambers

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-02-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 891 So. 2d 1176, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 869, 2005 WL 230183

Snippet: an order granting postconviction relief. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Lasley, 507 So.2d

State v. Rudolf

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-07-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 821 So. 2d 385

Snippet: Appellate Procedure 9.140. To the extent that section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (1999), seeks to confer jurisdiction…granting collateral relief pursuant to section 924.066(1). The State will have the opportunity to seek

Verrone v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-10-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 797 So. 2d 613

Snippet: appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2000) (requiring an adverse ruling

State v. Delvalle

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-12-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 745 So. 2d 541

Snippet: Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(M) and section 924.066(2) of the Florida Statutes. We disagree. Rule 9.140…by general law from final orders." Section 924.066(2) provides, *542 "Either the state or a prisoner…in conjunction, Rule 9.140(c)(1)(M) and section 924.066(2) allow the State to appeal from a final order

Russo v. Akers

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-11-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 724 So. 2d 1151

Snippet: not prohibited under section 924.051(9). Section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, appears to conflict with …944 (Fla.1993). Therefore, we construe section 924.066(3) to mean that there is no statutory right to …constitutionally or statutorily mandated."); § 924.066(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996) ("A person in a

Russo v. Selman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-12-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 702 So. 2d 270, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13604, 1997 WL 749241

Snippet: public defender in this case is contrary to section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, which is part of the Criminal

Russo v. Akers

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 701 So. 2d 366

Snippet: constitutionally or statutorily mandated and that section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), provides that…not prohibited under section 924.051(9). Section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, appears to conflict with …944 (Fla.1993). Therefore, we construe section 924.066(3) to mean that there is no statutory right to

State v. Torres

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-12-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 498 So. 2d 1326, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11315, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2578

Snippet: .1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1113, 101 S.Ct. 924, 66 L.Ed.2d 842 (1981); see also United States v. Mosquera-Ramirez