Florida Statute 924.066 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 924
CRIMINAL APPEALS AND COLLATERAL REVIEW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 924.066

924.066 Collateral relief.—

(1) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this chapter, a prisoner in custody may seek relief based upon claims that the judgment of conviction or sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or law of the United States or the State of Florida.

(2) Either the state or a prisoner in custody may obtain review in the next higher state court of a trial court’s adverse ruling granting or denying collateral relief. The state may obtain review of any trial court ruling that fails to enforce a procedural bar.

(3) A person in a noncapital case who is seeking collateral review under this chapter has no right to a court-appointed lawyer.

History.—s. 6, ch. 96-248.

F.S. 924.066 on Google Scholar

F.S. 924.066 on CourtListener

Amendments to 924.066

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 924.066

Total Results: 17

Thomas Lynn Cramer v. Secretary, Dept. of Corr.

461 F.3d 1380, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943, 2006 WL 2466912

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 28, 2006 | Docket: 659286

Cited 42 times | Published

post-conviction relief under Rule 3.800(a). Fla. Stat. Ann. § 924.066(2); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3). 4

Russo v. Akers

724 So. 2d 1151, 1998 WL 821778

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 1733852

Cited 11 times | Published

is not prohibited under section 924.051(9). Section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, appears to conflict with

State v. Delvalle

745 So. 2d 541, 1999 WL 1115432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 237387

Cited 9 times | Published

of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(M) and section 924.066(2) of the Florida Statutes. We disagree. Rule

Jordan v. State

81 So. 3d 595, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2012 WL 694757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2012 | Docket: 2414239

Cited 5 times | Published

motion for rehearing under rule 3.800(b)(1)(B)); § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (authorizing both the state and

State v. Rudolf

821 So. 2d 385, 2002 WL 1466261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 1236526

Cited 5 times | Published

Appellate Procedure 9.140. To the extent that section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (1999), seeks to confer

Russo v. Akers

701 So. 2d 366, 1997 WL 662369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1997 | Docket: 1443047

Cited 3 times | Published

constitutionally or statutorily mandated and that section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), provides

Baker v. State

210 So. 3d 140, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2016 | Docket: 4423913

Cited 1 times | Published

summary postconviction proceedings. See § 924.066(3), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“A person in a noncapital

Hogan v. State

12 So. 3d 835, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957, 2009 WL 1491445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2009 | Docket: 1646526

Cited 1 times | Published

failed to appeal the 2000 and 2002 orders. Section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (2000, 2002), provides

Verrone v. State

797 So. 2d 613, 2001 WL 1186877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2001 | Docket: 343608

Cited 1 times | Published

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2000) (requiring an adverse ruling

Matthew Dettle v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2024 | Docket: 69306034

Published

With that consideration in mind, both section 924.066, Florida Statutes (2024), and Florida Rule

STATE V. JENKINS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848200

Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2022) the order insofar as it

Darryl Len Morgan v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2022 | Docket: 65664767

Published

question 3. The dissent relies on section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (2017), a statutory provision

State of Florida v. Shelton Jackson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2019 | Docket: 15948148

Published

as orders granting postconviction relief. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2018); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J)

Beliveau v. State

144 So. 3d 634, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12215, 2014 WL 3882457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2014 | Docket: 839426

Published

statutory or constitutional right. See § 924.066(3), Fla. Stat. (2018); Gantt, 714 So

State v. Vasquez

918 So. 2d 1016, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 900, 2006 WL 197379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2006 | Docket: 64841849

Published

Vasquez’s motion for postconviction relief. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). In that order, the trial

State v. Chambers

891 So. 2d 1176, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 869, 2005 WL 230183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2005 | Docket: 64835674

Published

an order granting postconviction relief. See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Lasley, 507 So

Russo v. Selman

702 So. 2d 270, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13604, 1997 WL 749241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1997 | Docket: 64777193

Published

public defender in this case is contrary to section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, which is part of the