Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 18
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-23
Citation: 248 So. 3d 1165
Snippet: jurisdiction of the offense. Additionally, section 933.08, Florida Statutes, states: “The search warrant
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-09-30
Citation: 18 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14603, 2009 WL 3100937
Snippet: not named in the warrant, in violation of section 933.08, Florida Statutes).2 The strict construction rule
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-04-16
Citation: 980 So. 2d 1181, 2008 WL 1734144
Snippet: Morris v. State, 622 So.2d 67 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); § 933.08, Fla. Stat. (2005). Detectives Bradford and Williams
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-14
Citation: 667 So. 2d 175, 1995 WL 735925
Snippet: Florida is governed in relevant part by section 933.08 of the Florida Statutes, which reads: The search
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-08-12
Citation: 641 So. 2d 455, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8027, 1994 WL 419580
Snippet: contending that the search was invalid under section 933.08, Florida Statutes (1991), because the sheriff was
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-06-01
Citation: 640 So. 2d 1139, 1994 WL 231360
Snippet: when he did so, and thus in violation of section 933.08, Florida Statutes.[2] There were two search warrants
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-07-21
Citation: 622 So. 2d 67, 1993 WL 267375
Snippet: lawful process. As to search warrants, section 933.08, Florida Statutes (1991) provides: Search warrants
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-26
Citation: 502 So. 2d 1356, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 628, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992
Snippet: 697 (1944), but argues that sections 933.071 and 933.08,2 Florida Statutes (1985) authorize a municipal
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-12-13
Citation: 462 So. 2d 800
Snippet: Furthermore, we find that neither section 933.11 nor 933.08, Florida Statutes (1981), is violated when an officer
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-16
Citation: 439 So. 2d 896
Snippet: Cir.1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 850, 82 S.Ct. 933, 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962), the court affirmed McCarthy's
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-29
Citation: 448 So. 2d 1029, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18984
Snippet: to the person named in the warrant,” and section 933.08, that the warrant “shall in all cases be served
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-11-12
Citation: 389 So. 2d 1231, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17620
Snippet: should have granted the motion to suppress. Section 933.08, Florida Statutes (1979), requires that one of
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-02-14
Citation: 369 So. 2d 348
Snippet: of the Longboat Key Police Department. Section 933.08, Florida Statutes, (1977) reads: "The search warrant
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-08-30
Citation: 349 So. 2d 770, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16570
Snippet: State, 295 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1974); Section 933.08, Florida Statutes (1975). There was also some contention
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-06-05
Citation: 295 So. 2d 308
Snippet: authorized to execute it in violation of F.S. § 933.08 F.S.A. The warrant was directed to "the Sheriff
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-03-17
Citation: 199 So. 2d 324
Snippet: search warrant" before it is issued. F.S. Section 933.08 F.S.A. limits the service of such search warrants
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-10-23
Citation: 156 So. 2d 677
Snippet: Metropolitan Sheriff of Dade County, in violation of § 933.08, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., which reads as follows: "The
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-10-29
Citation: 130 So. 605, 100 Fla. 1097
Snippet: See Estes v. Crosby, 171 Wis. 73, 175 N.W. R. 933, 8 A. L. R. 1377; Hokanson v. Oatman, 165 Mich. 512