Florida Statute 933.11 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 933
SEARCH AND INSPECTION WARRANTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 933.11

933.11 Duplicate to be delivered when warrant served.—All search warrants shall be issued in duplicate. The duplicate shall be delivered to the officer with the original warrant, and when the officer serves the warrant, he or she shall deliver a copy to the person named in the warrant, or in his or her absence to some person in charge of, or living on the premises. When property is taken under the warrant the officer shall deliver to such person a written inventory of the property taken and receipt for the same, specifying the same in detail, and if no person is found in possession of the premises where such property is found, shall leave the said receipt on the premises.

History.—s. 11, ch. 9321, 1923; CGL 8513; s. 1572, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 933.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 933.11 on CourtListener

Amendments to 933.11

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 933.11

Total Results: 12

Dunnavant v. State

46 So. 2d 871, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 957

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1950 | Docket: 1667771

Cited 31 times | Published

the written inventory and receipt required by Section 933.11, F.S.A., is the evidence found upon the search

Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Haire

836 So. 2d 1040, 2003 WL 118257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2003 | Docket: 1745747

Cited 10 times | Published

provided to the person named in the warrant. See § 933.11, Fla. Stat. (2002). Duplicating and delivering

Martin v. State

344 So. 2d 248

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1976 | Docket: 1517716

Cited 5 times | Published

with his name of office." (Italics supplied.) Section 933.11, F.S. 1973, requires that all search warrants

Harden v. State

433 So. 2d 1378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1983 | Docket: 1727529

Cited 4 times | Published

a copy of the search warrant as provided in section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1981), which reads in pertinent

State v. Riley

462 So. 2d 800

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1984 | Docket: 449540

Cited 3 times | Published

Segura.[3] Furthermore, we find that neither section 933.11 nor 933.08, Florida Statutes (1981), is violated

State v. Nelson

542 So. 2d 1043, 1989 WL 44853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1989 | Docket: 468902

Cited 2 times | Published

Grady retained the affidavits contrary to section 933.11.[2] While service of an incomplete copy of

Miller v. State

170 So. 2d 319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1964 | Docket: 438081

Cited 1 times | Published

procedure complied with the mandate of Fla. Stat. § 933.11, F.S.A. With respect to the officer's alleged

State v. Gayle

573 So. 2d 968, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 426, 1991 WL 6003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1991 | Docket: 64656045

Published

validly executed. Neither section 933.09 nor section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1989) is violated when an

State v. Gaunt

456 So. 2d 534, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2034, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1984 | Docket: 64607015

Published

at the time of its execution as required by section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1983). Though contested

Riley v. State

448 So. 2d 1029, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1983 | Docket: 64604287

Published

in this case. The language employed in both section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1981) that “when the officer

Colocado v. State

251 So. 2d 721, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1971 | Docket: 64521837

Published

S. 436, 86 S.Ct.1602,16 L.Ed.2d 694. . F.S. § 933.11, F.S.A. . Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478

Feldman v. State

195 So. 2d 242, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1967 | Docket: 64499825

Published

specifying the same in detail * * *.” F.S.A. § 933.11. The judicial act complained of on appellants’