Florida Statute 933.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 933
SEARCH AND INSPECTION WARRANTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 933.11

933.11 Duplicate to be delivered when warrant served.—All search warrants shall be issued in duplicate. The duplicate shall be delivered to the officer with the original warrant, and when the officer serves the warrant, he or she shall deliver a copy to the person named in the warrant, or in his or her absence to some person in charge of, or living on the premises. When property is taken under the warrant the officer shall deliver to such person a written inventory of the property taken and receipt for the same, specifying the same in detail, and if no person is found in possession of the premises where such property is found, shall leave the said receipt on the premises.

History.—s. 11, ch. 9321, 1923; CGL 8513; s. 1572, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 933.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 933.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 933.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 933.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 933.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 933.11

Total Results: 13

Daniels v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-27

Citation: 197 So. 3d 1226, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11435, 2016 WL 4035627

Snippet: 707 (Mo.1925); Woods v. Commonwealth, 86 Va. 933, 11 S.E. 799, 799 (1890). We agree, and find the failure

Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Haire

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-01-15

Citation: 836 So. 2d 1040, 2003 WL 118257

Snippet: provided to the person named in the warrant. See § 933.11, Fla. Stat. (2002). Duplicating and delivering

State v. Gayle

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-01-24

Citation: 573 So. 2d 968, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 426, 1991 WL 6003

Snippet: validly executed. Neither section 933.09 nor section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1989) is violated when an officer

State v. Nelson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-04-27

Citation: 542 So. 2d 1043, 1989 WL 44853

Snippet: 508 So.2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); §§ 933.07 & 933.11, Fla. Stat. (1987). This is not a situation where

State v. Riley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-12-13

Citation: 462 So. 2d 800

Snippet: Segura.[3] Furthermore, we find that neither section 933.11 nor 933.08, Florida Statutes (1981), is violated

State v. Gaunt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-19

Citation: 456 So. 2d 534, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2034, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15065

Snippet: the time of its execution as required by section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1983). Though contested by the

Harden v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-07-13

Citation: 433 So. 2d 1378

Snippet: provided in section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1981), which reads in pertinent part: 933.11 Duplicate to be

Riley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-29

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1029, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18984

Snippet: this case. The language employed in both section 933.11, Florida Statutes (1981) that “when the officer

Martin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-16

Citation: 344 So. 2d 248

Snippet: his name of office." (Italics supplied.) Section 933.11, F.S. 1973, requires that all search warrants be

Colocado v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-03-16

Citation: 251 So. 2d 721, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6214

Snippet: S. 436, 86 S.Ct.1602,16 L.Ed.2d 694. . F.S. § 933.11, F.S.A. . Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478

Feldman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-02-07

Citation: 195 So. 2d 242, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5337

Snippet: specifying the same in detail * * *.” F.S.A. § 933.11. The judicial act complained of on appellants’

Miller v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-12-09

Citation: 170 So. 2d 319

Snippet: named therein. *322 See Fla.Stats. §§ 933.09 and 933.11, F.S.A. We find the latter contention without merit

Dunnavant v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1950-06-13

Citation: 46 So. 2d 871, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 957

Snippet: written inventory and receipt required by Section 933.11, F.S.A., is the evidence found upon the search