Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 945.25 (2025)

Records.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

945.25 Records.—

(1) It shall be the duty of the Department of Corrections to obtain and place in its records information as complete as practicable on every person who may be sentenced to supervision or incarceration under the jurisdiction of the department. Such information shall be obtained as soon as possible after imposition of sentence and shall, in the discretion of the department, include, among other things:

(a) A copy of the indictment or information and a complete statement of the facts of the crime for which such person has been sentenced.

(b) The court in which the person was sentenced.

(d) The name of the presiding judge, the prosecuting officers, the investigating officers, and the attorneys for the person convicted.

(e) A copy of all probation reports which may have been made.

(f) Any social, physical, mental, psychiatric, or criminal record of such person.

(2) It shall be the duty of the court and its prosecuting officials to furnish to the department upon its request such information and also to furnish such copies of such minutes and other records as may be in their possession or under their control.

(3) Following the initial hearing provided for in s. 947.172(1), the commission shall prepare and the department shall include in the official record a copy of the seriousness-of-offense and favorable-parole-outcome scores and shall include a listing of the specific factors and information used in establishing a presumptive parole release date for the inmate.

History.—s. 11, ch. 20519, 1941; ss. 19, 35, ch. 69-106; ss. 81, 87, ch. 77-120; s. 20, ch. 78-417; s. 97, ch. 79-3; s. 57, ch. 88-122; s. 5, ch. 92-310; s. 28, ch. 95-145; s. 26, ch. 2004-335.

Note.—Former s. 947.14(1), (2), (4), and (6).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1990–2008 · leading case: Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). · cites it 4× “[6] § 945.25(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). [7] Id. [8] § 945.”

Adams v. State, 560 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). · cites it 3× “The record in this case reflects that the information which appellant seeks to have expunged from the Department records was not included in the Department file, until the material was provided by appellant, attached to his request for expunction.”

Parker v. State, 973 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). “rs, c) that it is the regular practice of the Florida Department of Corrections to make, keep, and maintain the attached computer data during the course of regularly conducted business, d) and that the attached computer data record is a true and correct copy of the original…”

Ward v. State, 965 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). · cites it 2× “Under Florida law, the Department has a statutory duty to "obtain and place in its permanent records information as complete as may be practicably available on every person who may become subject to parole.”

Smith v. State, 990 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). “c) that it is the regular practice of the Florida Department of Corrections to make, keep, and maintain the attached computer data during the course of regularly conducted business, d) and that the attached computer data record is a true and correct copy of the original record…”

— 945.25(1) — 2 cases

Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). “[6] § 945.25(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). [7] Id. [8] § 945.”

Ward v. State, 965 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). “Under Florida law, the Department has a statutory duty to "obtain and place in its permanent records information as complete as may be practicably available on every person who may become subject to parole.”

— 945.25(2) — 1 case

Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). “[6] § 945.25(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). [7] Id. [8] § 945.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.