Florida Statute 948.09 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

F.S. 948.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 948.09 on CourtListener
Amendments to 948.09

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 948.09
Total Results: 40
State v. Williams
712 So. 2d 762, 1998 WL 285248
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1998 | Docket: 1472101
Cited 35 times | Published
OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE
Nieves v. State
678 So. 2d 468, 1996 WL 464157
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1996 | Docket: 1737036
Cited 8 times | Published
the Department of Corrections, pursuant to section 948.09, Florida Statutes (1995), need not be orally
Haygood v. State
687 So. 2d 318, 1997 WL 30923
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1997 | Docket: 1718521
Cited 7 times | Published
(Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The state argues that section 948.09(7), Florida Statutes (1995), permits courts
Griffis v. State
848 So. 2d 422, 2003 WL 21501907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2003 | Docket: 1309450
Cited 6 times | Published
plus a $2.00 monthly surcharge pursuant to section 948.09(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes (1999). The affidavit
Williams v. State
700 So. 2d 750, 1997 WL 614560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1997 | Docket: 1373114
Cited 4 times | Published
in this case has pointed out, however, that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that
Martin v. State
618 So. 2d 737, 1993 WL 105445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1993 | Docket: 1720328
Cited 4 times | Published
is to be effected. Under the provisions of section 948.09(1), Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court
Shacker v. State
106 So. 3d 36, 2013 WL 332134, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1212
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2013 | Docket: 60228185
Cited 3 times | Published
unless otherwise exempted, in accordance with Section 948.09, Florida Statutes, and as grounds for belief
Blanchette v. State
620 So. 2d 258, 1993 WL 225639
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1993 | Docket: 1722867
Cited 3 times | Published
cocaine and sale of cocaine. We observed that section 948.09(1), Florida Statutes (1991), authorizes the
Erin Vontez Thompson v. State of Florida
250 So. 3d 132
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2018 | Docket: 6742536
Cited 2 times | Published
her responsibilities to her three dependents. § 948.09(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2018) (Department may exempt
Porchia v. State
705 So. 2d 1050, 1998 WL 56427
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1998 | Docket: 1555001
Cited 2 times | Published
reimposed. Justice. The state has pointed out that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995) appears to contain
Smith v. State
702 So. 2d 1305, 1997 WL 716800
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1997 | Docket: 460207
Cited 2 times | Published
v. State, 700 So.2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that
Lamont Rum Fortson v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2025 | Docket: 71117375
Published
imposition of costs for supervision is governed by section 948.09(1)(a)1., which provides: Any
Nikeira Martinez Avila v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2025 | Docket: 70962147
Published
supervision cost under section 948.09(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2023). Section 948.09(1)(a)1. pertinently
ANTONIOUS WHITE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2024 | Docket: 69042410
Published
requires him to pay costs of supervision. See id. § 948.09(1)(a)1. (requiring payment of costs of supervision
Michael Anthony Arcamone v. The State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68913259
Published
supervision fee in excess of Florida Statutes section 948.09(1)(b)’s forty-dollar fee without any accompanying
Kenneth A. Frank v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2024 | Docket: 68886330
Published
Monthly costs of supervision are authorized by section 948.09, Florida Statutes (2022), which provides in
DEVASSE THOMPSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2024 | Docket: 68562341
Published
agree that Thompson’s position is well taken. See § 948.09(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Any person ordered
Zandia Michele Mobley v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2024 | Docket: 68465994
Published
supervision in excess of the amount authorized by section 948.09(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2022), and when it
SHERRI LAVICTOIRE MARQUIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2022 | Docket: 63335822
Published
Paying $50 Per Month for Cost of Supervision Section 948.09(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2020), provides: “Any
JEFFREY ALLEN SIKICH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2022 | Docket: 63266921
Published
impose only a $40 monthly supervision charge. See § 948.09(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Any person placed on
JACQUELINE RIVERA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2022 | Docket: 63198515
Published
L. Weekly D445 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb. 16, 2022); § 948.09(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020). We further find
SAMUEL JOSHUA PARIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2022 | Docket: 63008458
Published
impose only a $40 monthly supervision charge. See § 948.09(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“Any person placed on
MICHAEL DAVID SANDOVAL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2022 | Docket: 63008462
Published
sentencing. The State agrees and so do we. Section 948.09(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2020), provides that
MARK METELLUS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2021 | Docket: 29102121
Published
afforded to the Department of Corrections in section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), is insufficient
MARK METELLUS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2020 | Docket: 18642920
Published
afforded to the Department of Corrections in section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), is insufficient
SHAREE DIXON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2020 | Docket: 18534801
Published
both a $2 surcharge and a 4% surcharge under section 948.09, Florida Statutes (2016), while the statute
Brown v. McNeil
591 F. Supp. 2d 1245, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39210, 2008 WL 2073910
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 14, 2008 | Docket: 2286502
Published
Petitioner "did willfully fail to comply with Florida Statute 948.09 formerly 945.30 and as of February 11,
Parrish v. State
898 So. 2d 1074, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3692, 2005 WL 636880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2005 | Docket: 64837443
Published
the costs of such testing, is authorized by section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes. We agree with appellant
Gray v. State
791 So. 2d 560, 2001 WL 871385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2001 | Docket: 1228892
Published
imposed by the Parole Commission. See Fla. Stat. § 948.09(1)(a)1 (1999).[2] The statute also proscribes
Edwards v. State
728 So. 2d 736, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 258, 1999 WL 92239
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1999 | Docket: 64786905
Published
OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE
State v. Porchia
716 So. 2d 766, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 423, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1475, 1998 WL 608231
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64782445
Published
OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE
Edwards v. State
780 So. 2d 86, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6564, 1998 WL 299350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1998 | Docket: 64804303
Published
OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE
State v. Smith
710 So. 2d 980, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 295, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1036, 1998 WL 286287
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1998 | Docket: 64780957
Published
OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE
Hernandez v. State
708 So. 2d 1003, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2959, 1998 WL 135242
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1998 | Docket: 64780031
Published
OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE
Huff v. State
700 So. 2d 787, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11976, 1997 WL 655939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1997 | Docket: 64776331
Published
in this case has pointed out, however, that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that
Felix v. State
709 So. 2d 547, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6541, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1458
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1997 | Docket: 64780218
Published
was put on notice of those requirements by section 948.09, Florida Statutes (1995), section 958.04, Florida
Campbell v. State
661 So. 2d 122, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10492, 1995 WL 581690
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1995 | Docket: 64759183
Published
paying the costs of supervision required by section 948.09, Florida Statutes (1994). See Royster v. State
Johnson v. State
660 So. 2d 794, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9920, 1995 WL 553025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1995 | Docket: 64758890
Published
paying the costs of supervision required by section 948.09, Florida Statutes (1994). See Royster v. State
Kionka v. State
660 So. 2d 419, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9921, 1995 WL 553015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1995 | Docket: 64758684
Published
DCA 1995). It is also clear from the face of section 948.09(3), Florida Statutes (1994), that any authority
Dykes v. State
623 So. 2d 827, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8976, 1993 WL 347786
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1993 | Docket: 64698542
Published
pay any more than the assessment allowed by section 948.09(1)[, Florida Statutes (1991)].” 620 So.2d at