Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 948.09 (2025)

Payment for cost of supervision and other monetary obligations.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

948.09 Payment for cost of supervision and other monetary obligations.—

(1)(a)1. Any person ordered by the court, the Department of Corrections, or the Florida Commission on Offender Review to be placed under supervision under this chapter, chapter 944, chapter 945, chapter 947, or chapter 958, or in a pretrial intervention program, must, as a condition of any placement, pay the department a total sum of money equal to the total month or portion of a month of supervision times the court-ordered amount, but not to exceed the actual per diem cost of the supervision. The department shall adopt rules by which an offender who pays in full and in advance of regular termination of supervision may receive a reduction in the amount due. The rules shall incorporate provisions by which the offender’s ability to pay is linked to an established written payment plan. Funds collected from felony offenders may be used to offset costs of the Department of Corrections associated with community supervision programs, subject to appropriation by the Legislature.

2. In addition to any other contribution or surcharge imposed by this section, each felony offender assessed under this paragraph shall pay a $2-per-month surcharge to the department. The surcharge shall be deemed to be paid only after the full amount of any monthly payment required by the established written payment plan has been collected by the department. These funds shall be used by the department to pay for correctional probation officers’ training and equipment, including radios, and firearms training, firearms, and attendant equipment necessary to train and equip officers who choose to carry a concealed firearm while on duty. This subparagraph does not limit the department’s authority to determine who shall be authorized to carry a concealed firearm while on duty, or limit the right of a correctional probation officer to carry a personal firearm approved by the department.

(b) Any person placed on misdemeanor probation by a county court must contribute not less than $40 per month, as decided by the sentencing court, to the court-approved public or private entity providing misdemeanor supervision.

(2) Any person being electronically monitored by the department as a result of being placed on supervision shall pay the department for electronic monitoring services at a rate that may not exceed the full cost of the monitoring service in addition to the cost of supervision as directed by the sentencing court. The funds collected under this subsection shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund. The department may exempt a person from paying all or any part of the costs of the electronic monitoring service if it finds that any of the factors listed in subsection (3) exist.

(3) Any failure to pay contribution as required under this section may constitute a ground for the revocation of supervision by the court or by the Florida Commission on Offender Review, the revocation of control release by the Control Release Authority, or the removal from the pretrial intervention program by the state attorney. The Department of Corrections may exempt a person from the payment of all or any part of the contribution if it finds any of the following factors:

(a) The offender has diligently attempted, but has been unable, to obtain or maintain employment that provides him or her sufficient income to make such payments.

(b) The offender is a student in a school, college, university, or course of career training designed to fit the student for gainful employment. Certification of such student status shall be supplied to the offender’s probation officer by the educational institution in which the offender is enrolled.

(d) The offender’s age prevents him or her from obtaining employment.

(e) The offender is responsible for the support of dependents, and the payment of such contribution constitutes an undue hardship on the offender.

(f) The offender has been transferred outside the state under an interstate compact adopted pursuant to chapter 949.

(4) As a condition of an interstate compact adopted pursuant to chapter 949, the department shall require each out-of-state probationer or parolee transferred to this state to contribute not less than $30 or more than the cost of supervision, certified by the Department of Corrections, per month to defray the cost incurred by this state as a result of providing supervision and rehabilitation during the period of supervision.

(5) In addition to any other required contributions, the department, at its discretion, may require offenders under any form of supervision to submit to and pay for urinalysis testing to identify drug usage as part of the rehabilitation program. Any failure to make such payment, or participate, may be considered a ground for revocation by the court, the Florida Commission on Offender Review, or the Control Release Authority, or for removal from the pretrial intervention program by the state attorney. The department may exempt a person from such payment if it determines that any of the factors specified in subsection (3) exist.

(6) The department shall establish a payment plan for all costs ordered by the courts for collection by the department and a priority order for payments, except that victim restitution payments authorized under s. 948.03(1)(f) take precedence over all other court-ordered payments. The department is not required to disburse cumulative amounts of less than $10 to individual payees established on this payment plan.

History.—s. 18, ch. 74-112; s. 2, ch. 76-238; s. 1, ch. 77-321; s. 1, ch. 77-428; s. 1, ch. 78-368; s. 100, ch. 79-3; s. 1, ch. 84-337; s. 10, ch. 85-340; ss. 58, 73, ch. 88-122; s. 7, ch. 89-526; s. 6, ch. 90-337; s. 1, ch. 91-225; s. 7, ch. 91-280; s. 2, ch. 92-298; s. 4, ch. 94-265; s. 1, ch. 94-290; s. 41, ch. 95-283; s. 51, ch. 96-312; s. 1878, ch. 97-102; s. 8, ch. 98-388; s. 16, ch. 2001-242; s. 5, ch. 2004-251; s. 65, ch. 2004-357; s. 29, ch. 2004-373; s. 150, ch. 2005-2; s. 11, ch. 2009-63; s. 19, ch. 2010-64; s. 50, ch. 2014-191; s. 10, ch. 2017-115.

Note.—Former s. 945.30.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 41 cases (19 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: State v. Williams, 712 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Williams, 712 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1998). · cites it 10× “The State claimed that this statute supported the conclusion that the probation *764 condition requiring respondent to pay for drug testing is a general condition of probation.”

Blanchette v. State, 620 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). · cites it 6× “51, Florida Statutes (1991), nonviolent offenders may be diverted from the state prison system and punished with community-based sanctions.”

Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). · cites it 6× “Under the provisions of section 948.09(1), Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court is authorized to require a probationer to pay for the cost of supervision.”

Williams v. State, 700 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). · cites it 2× “The State in this case has pointed out, however, that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a defendant on supervision may be required by the Department of Corrections to pay for drug urinalysis and that the failure to pay may be considered a ground for…”

Nieves v. State, 678 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). · cites it 2× “00 per month surcharge to the Department of Corrections, pursuant to section 948.09, Florida Statutes (1995), need not be orally pronounced.”

Haygood v. State, 687 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). · cites it 2× “The state argues that section 948.09(7), Florida Statutes (1995), permits courts to delegate to the Department of Corrections the responsibility of establishing a payment schedule.”

Shacker v. State, 106 So. 3d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). · cites it 2× “00 per month toward cost of supervision, plus a 4% surcharge, unless otherwise exempted, in accordance with Section 948.09, Florida Statutes, and as grounds for belief that the offender violated his probation, Officer Schultz states that the offender has failed to make a payment…”

Erin Vontez Thompson v. State of Florida, 250 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). · cites it 2× “§ 948.09(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2018) (Department may exempt a probationer from the payment of such costs if she “is responsible for the support of dependents, and the payment of such contribution constitutes an undue hardship on [her].”

Smith v. State, 702 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). · cites it 2× “2d DCA 1997), section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a defendant on supervision may be required by the Department of Corrections to pay for drug urinalysis and that the failure to pay may be considered a ground for revocation by the court.”

Griffis v. State, 848 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). “00 monthly surcharge pursuant to section 948.09(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes (1999).”

Porchia v. State, 705 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). · cites it 2× “The state has pointed out that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995) appears to contain the requirement to pay for such testing and the Second District has certified the question whether requiring the probationer to pay for random drug testing is actually a general…”

Gray v. State, 791 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). · cites it 3× “See Fla. Stat. § 948.09 (1)(a)1 (1999). [2] The statute also proscribes the length of supervision in excess of the maximum sentence imposed by the court, and the consequences for violating conditional release are limited.”

Show all 41 citing cases →

— 948.09(1) — 3 cases

Blanchette v. State, 620 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). “51, Florida Statutes (1991), nonviolent offenders may be diverted from the state prison system and punished with community-based sanctions.”

Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). “Under the provisions of section 948.09(1), Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court is authorized to require a probationer to pay for the cost of supervision.”

Dykes v. State, 623 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

— 948.09(1)(a) — 9 cases

Griffis v. State, 848 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). “00 monthly surcharge pursuant to section 948.09(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes (1999).”

Gray v. State, 791 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). “See Fla. Stat. § 948.09 (1)(a)1 (1999). [2] The statute also proscribes the length of supervision in excess of the maximum sentence imposed by the court, and the consequences for violating conditional release are limited.”

Nikeira Martinez Avila v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Kenneth A. Frank v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).

Lamont Rum Fortson v. State of Florida (Fla. 6th DCA 2025).

— 948.09(1)(a)(1) — 2 cases

Devasse Thompson v. State of Florida (Fla. 6th DCA 2024).

Kendrick v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr. (Hillsborough Cnty.) (M.D. Fla. 2025).

— 948.09(1)(a)(2) — 1 case

Berthier v. People of the Virgin Islands, 2024 V.I. 35 (2024).

— 948.09(1)(b) — 11 cases

Jeffrey Allen Sikich v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Samuel Joshua Paris v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Michael David Sandoval v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Jacqueline Rivera v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Sherri Lavictoire Marquis v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

— 948.09(3) — 3 cases

Kionka v. State, 660 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Campbell v. State, 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Johnson v. State, 660 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

— 948.09(3)(e) — 1 case

Erin Vontez Thompson v. State of Florida, 250 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “§ 948.09(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2018) (Department may exempt a probationer from the payment of such costs if she “is responsible for the support of dependents, and the payment of such contribution constitutes an undue hardship on [her].”

— 948.09(6) — 8 cases

State v. Williams, 712 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1998). “The State claimed that this statute supported the conclusion that the probation *764 condition requiring respondent to pay for drug testing is a general condition of probation.”

Williams v. State, 700 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). “The State in this case has pointed out, however, that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a defendant on supervision may be required by the Department of Corrections to pay for drug urinalysis and that the failure to pay may be considered a ground for…”

Smith v. State, 702 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). “2d DCA 1997), section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a defendant on supervision may be required by the Department of Corrections to pay for drug urinalysis and that the failure to pay may be considered a ground for revocation by the court.”

Porchia v. State, 705 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). “The state has pointed out that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995) appears to contain the requirement to pay for such testing and the Second District has certified the question whether requiring the probationer to pay for random drug testing is actually a general…”

Huff v. State, 700 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

— 948.09(7) — 1 case

Haygood v. State, 687 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). “The state argues that section 948.09(7), Florida Statutes (1995), permits courts to delegate to the Department of Corrections the responsibility of establishing a payment schedule.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.