Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 1002.96 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 1002.96 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 1002.96

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1002
STUDENT AND PARENTAL RIGHTS AND EDUCATIONAL CHOICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 1002.96
1002.96 Early Head Start collaboration grants.
(1) Contingent upon specific appropriation, the department shall establish a program to award collaboration grants to assist local agencies in securing Early Head Start programs through Early Head Start program federal grants. The collaboration grants shall provide the required matching funds for public and private nonprofit agencies that have been approved for Early Head Start program federal grants.
(2) Public and private nonprofit agencies providing Early Head Start programs applying for collaborative grants must:
(a) Meet the requirements in the Head Start program performance standards and other applicable rules and regulations.
(b) Collaborate with other service providers at the local level.
(c) Provide a comprehensive array of health, nutritional, and other services to the program’s pregnant women and very young children, and their families.
(3) The department may adopt rules as necessary for the award of collaboration grants to competing agencies and the administration of the collaboration grants program under this section.
History.s. 17, ch. 2013-252; s. 61, ch. 2021-10.

F.S. 1002.96 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1002.96 on Casetext

Amendments to 1002.96


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1002.96
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1002.96.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1002.96

Total Results: 9

Conner v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-09-02

Citation: 910 So. 2d 313, 2005 WL 2104321

Snippet: Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, 803, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting))

Bridges v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-08-04

Citation: 878 So. 2d 483, 2004 WL 1672366

Snippet: instruction. Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952) (no constitutional infirmity

Holiday v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-24

Citation: 753 So. 2d 1264, 2000 WL 218110

Snippet: defendant. Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952). The basis for the decision

Furlong v. Raimi

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-23

Citation: 735 So. 2d 583, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8316, 1999 WL 438842

Snippet: PER CURIAM. This is a motion to review a post-appeal cost judgment awarding the appellees their costs by virtue of their being the prevailing parties in Raimi v. Furlong, 702 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 531 (Fla.1998)(“Raimi I ”), against the appellant, Estelle G. Furlong, individually. Upon remand, the ap-pellees were awarded their appellate costs pursuant to Rule 9.400(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.1 See American Med. Int’l, Inc. v. Scheller, 484 So.2d 593

Raimi v. Furlong

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-09-17

Citation: 702 So. 2d 1273, 1997 WL 574655

Snippet: G. FURLONG, Appellee. Nos. 96-954, 96-998, 96-1002, 96-1011 and 96-1012. District Court of Appeal of

Smith v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-01-21

Citation: 521 So. 2d 106, 1988 WL 4378

Snippet: Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, *108 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952). The basis for the decision

Snook v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-11-05

Citation: 478 So. 2d 403, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2481

Snippet: (1977); Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1952). This being so, we conclude

Reese v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-25

Citation: 452 So. 2d 1079

Snippet: choose. Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952); Patterson v. New York, 432

In Re Beverly

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-01-27

Citation: 342 So. 2d 481, 97 A.L.R. 3d 767

Snippet: requirement. In Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1302 (1952), the court refused to impose