Florida Statute 1003.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE

Chapter 1003
PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1003.04

1003.04 Student conduct and parental involvement.—

(1) Each public K-12 student must remain in attendance throughout the school year, unless excused by the school for illness or other good cause, and must comply fully with the school’s code of conduct.

(2) The parent of each public K-12 student must cooperate with the authority of the student’s district school board, superintendent, principal, teachers, and school bus drivers, according to ss. 1003.31 and 1003.32, to remove the student from the classroom and the school bus and, when appropriate and available, to place the student in an alternative educational setting, if the student is disobedient, disrespectful, violent, abusive, uncontrollable, or disruptive.

(3) It is the goal of the Legislature and each district school board that the parent of each public K-12 student comply with the school’s reasonable and time-acceptable parental involvement requests.

History.—s. 114, ch. 2002-387; s. 34, ch. 2003-391.

F.S. 1003.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1003.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 1003.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1003.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1003.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1003.04

Total Results: 20

JONATHAN TRAMMELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-05

Snippet: See, e.g., Richardson v. State, 918 So. 2d 999, 1003–04 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that dismissal of

KIPP COOPER AND CLASSIC PLUMBING OF BREVARD, LLC vs TAMMY GONZALEZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-31

Snippet: permanent injury to the plaintiff’s neck.” Id. at 1003–04. Finding that the defense medical expert was clear

Michael D. Spear v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-06-16

Snippet: and Second District Courts of Appeal. Id. at 1003-04. Because the rephrased certified question is determinative

Tanya Darlene Chappell and Secure etc. v. Olivia Clark

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-15

Snippet: permanency. Cf. Duclos v. Richardson, 113 So. 3d 1001, 1003-04 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that defense expert’s

Ayala v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-06

Snippet: offenses. See Wade v. State, 125 So. 3d 1002, 1003-04 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (holding that when a summons

Scott A. Brock, Former Husband v. Carolyn Ann Brock, Former Wife

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-11

Citation: 229 So. 3d 425

Snippet: Buchanan v. Buchanan, No. 1D16-4492, 225 So.3d 1002, 1003-04, 2017 WL 4018417 at *1 (Fla. 1st DCA September

Adrian Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-25

Citation: 185 So. 3d 1214, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 62, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 394, 2016 WL 743258

Snippet: See, e.g., Duclos v. Richardson, 113 So.3d 1001, 1003-04 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). In both of these instances

James v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-10

Citation: 173 So. 3d 1035, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10489, 2015 WL 4154177

Snippet: See Wade v. State, 125 So.3d 1002, 1003-04 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (“[W]hile Wade may not have

Beharry v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-06-19

Citation: 168 So. 3d 263, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9317, 2015 WL 3793491

Snippet: fundamental error. See Williams v. State, 145 So.3d 997, 1003-04 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). *265We also reject the State’s

Angela Rosario v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-07

Citation: 165 So. 3d 672, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 175, 2015 WL 71820

Snippet: State, 991 *674 So.2d 1003, 1003-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Padilla involved

Stinson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-17

Citation: 117 So. 3d 859, 2013 WL 3717535, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11224

Snippet: reasonable suspicion to conduct the stop. Id. at 1003-04. “The sole basis for the Officer’s search and seizure

Neely v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-17

Citation: 126 So. 3d 342, 2013 WL 1629227, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6024

Snippet: juvenile does not request such opportunity. Id. at 1003-04 (citations omitted). We are aware that section

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-03-14

Citation: 110 So. 3d 419, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 160, 2013 WL 978259, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 440

Snippet: defendants] “were negligent.” Douglas, 83 So.3d at 1003-04 (footnotes omitted) (quoting Engle, 945 So.2d at

McKenzie v. Betts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-02

Citation: 55 So. 3d 615, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1044, 2011 WL 309318

Snippet: Cingular Wireless, 160 Wash.2d 843, 161 P.3d 1000, 1003-04 (2007) (applying Washington state law and holding

Chin v. CAIAFFA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-04

Citation: 42 So. 3d 300, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11287, 2010 WL 3023297

Snippet: consideration of the cause. See SDG Dadeland, 979 So.2d at 1003-04 (discussing violation of the Golden Rule). Mr.

Desiderio Corp. v. City of Boynton Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-07

Citation: 39 So. 3d 487, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9870, 2010 WL 2675237

Snippet: that it benefited “people, not property.” Id. at 1003-04. First, this court receded from “any suggestion”

McINTOSH v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-02

Citation: 37 So. 3d 914, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7602, 2010 WL 2178791

Snippet: the juvenile." Frances v. State, 857 So.2d 1002, 1003-04 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (citing Brancaccio, 773 So

Ruiz v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-09-09

Citation: 18 So. 3d 660, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13186, 2009 WL 2870050

Snippet: 1255 (2000). Rosas [v. State, 991 So.2d 1003, 1003-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)]. But cf. Dumenigo v. State

State v. Tabuteau

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-08-26

Citation: 16 So. 3d 991, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12506, 2009 WL 2601939

Snippet: officials. 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (2000). Rosas, 991 So.2d at 1003-04. Reversed and remanded.

Cutler v. Cutler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-03

Citation: 994 So. 2d 341, 2008 WL 4057751

Snippet: 341; see also Snyder v. Davis, 699 So.2d 999, 1003-04, 1005 (Fla.1997) (confirming that homestead property