Florida Statute 1013.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE

Chapter 1013
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1013.14

1013.14 Proposed purchase of real property by a board; confidentiality of records; procedure.—

(1)(a) In any case in which a board, pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, seeks to acquire by purchase any real property for educational purposes, every appraisal, offer, or counteroffer must be in writing and is exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) until an option contract is executed or, if no option contract is executed, until 30 days before a contract or agreement for purchase is considered for approval by the board. If a contract or agreement for purchase is not submitted to the board for approval, the exemption from s. 119.07(1) shall expire 30 days after the termination of negotiations. The board shall maintain complete and accurate records of every such appraisal, offer, and counteroffer. For the purposes of this section, the term “option contract” means an agreement by the board to purchase a piece of property, subject to the approval of the board at a public meeting after 30 days’ public notice.

(b) Before acquisition of the property, the board shall obtain at least one appraisal by an appraiser approved pursuant to s. 253.025(8) for each purchase in an amount greater than $100,000 and not more than $500,000. For each purchase in an amount in excess of $500,000, the board shall obtain at least two appraisals by appraisers approved pursuant to s. 253.025(8). If the agreed to purchase price exceeds the average appraised value, the board is required to approve the purchase by an extraordinary vote.

(2) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as providing an exemption from, or an exception to, s. 286.011.

History.—s. 807, ch. 2002-387; s. 48, ch. 2016-233.

F.S. 1013.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1013.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 1013.14

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1013.14

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1013.14.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1013.14

Total Results: 20

Lateef Garnes v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-28

Snippet: cannot be increased on resentencing. See id. at 1013-14. 5 offenses

JEAN CLAUDE PHILIPPE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-08

Snippet: . . .”); Johnson v. State, 114 So. 3d 1012, 1013–14 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (instructing that “[i]n order

PSHS ALPHA PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a LAKE WORTH SURGICAL CENTER a/a/o CATHERINE CHISEM v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-12-14

Snippet: Design Cabinets, Inc. v. Bentley, 320 So. 3d 1013, 1013-14 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“[T]he determination of whether

PSHS ALPHA PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a LAKE WORTH SURGICAL CENTER a/a/o THOMAS MCGRANE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-12-14

Snippet: Design Cabinets, Inc. v. Bentley, 320 So. 3d 1013, 1013-14 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“[T]he determination of whether

ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. AMERICAN INTERGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-03-23

Snippet: (quoting Price v. RLI Ins. Co., 914 So. 2d 1010, 1013– 14 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)). Thus, the homeowner is necessarily

ALLSTATE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS TRANSFER, INC. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-02-02

Snippet: to dismiss); Bush v. Schiavo, 871 So. 2d 1012, 1013-14 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (finding that governor had

EXPERT INSPECTIONS, LLC v. UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-01-05

Snippet: 2008) and Price v. RLI Ins. Co., 914 So. 2d 1010, 1013–14 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), the AOB agreement was a “limited”

Dontae R. Morris v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-08

Snippet: opinions of its experts. Hernandez, 180 So. 3d at 1013-14. In Hernandez, we rejected a claim that counsel

MOHAMMAD SIDIQ and JOSEFINA SIDIQ v. TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE CO.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-31

Snippet: (quoting Price v. RLI Ins. Co., 914 So. 2d 1010, 1013-14 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)). Thus, once the interest has

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. SABATINO J. LEONE AND DIANA LEONE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-03

Citation: 271 So. 3d 172

Snippet: -5- accelerate the balance due. See id. at 1013–14, 1021 (citing paragraph 19 of the mortgage, which

DILSON S. URRIBARI and LA PLACITA GROCERY OF FORT PIERCE CORP. v. 52 SW 5TH CT WHSE, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-20

Citation: 266 So. 3d 1257

Snippet: Krieger v. Ocean Props., Ltd., 387 So. 2d 1012, 1013-14 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). It is improper to enter judgment

Solonina v. Artglass International

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-10

Citation: 256 So. 3d 971

Snippet: his counsel’s illness. Thompson, 439 So. 2d at 1013-14. The Second District found that the trial court

U.S. Bank v. Morelli

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-06

Citation: 249 So. 3d 717

Snippet: or “and all subsequent payments.” See id. at 1013-14 (Shepherd, J., concurring) (distinguishing Collazo

Akin v. Jacobs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-22

Citation: 230 So. 3d 1292

Snippet: review. See Johnson v. State, 114 So.3d 1012, 1013-14 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (“In order to preserve improprieties

Klebanoff v. Bank of New York Mellon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-30

Citation: 228 So. 3d 167, 2017 WL 2818078

Snippet: outside the limitation period. Id. at 1013-14 (Shepherd, J., concurring). By contrast, in

SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. and the Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. and Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. – Corrected Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-16

Snippet: accelerated in the first foreclosure action. Id. at 1013-14. Based on Singleton, the Fifth District explained

Varnedore v. Copeland

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-10

Citation: 210 So. 3d 741

Snippet: Civ. P. (Two Year Cycle), 858 So.2d 1013, 1013-14 (Fla. 2003) (“Therefore, to make [Florida Rules

Rodriguez v. Copeland

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-06

Snippet: of Civ. P. (Two-year cycle), 858 So. 2d 1013, 1013-14 (Fla. 2003) (“Therefore, to make [Florida Rules

Ames v. Ames

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-16

Citation: 204 So. 3d 132, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17129

Snippet: for Animals, Inc. v. Monroe Cty., 69 So.3d 1011, 1013-14 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Although this case may make

& SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & The Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-03

Citation: 211 So. 3d 1009

Snippet: acceleration under Section 18. See majority op. at 1013-14.