The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Schafer , 507 U.S. 1013, 1014, 113 S.Ct. 1668, 123 L.Ed.2d 285 (1993) (O'CONNOR, J., concurring in denial . . .
. . . Schafer , 507 U.S. 1013, 1014, 113 S.Ct. 1668, 123 L.Ed.2d 285 (1993) (O'Connor, J., concurring in denial . . .
. . . Schafer , 507 U.S. 1013, 1014, 113 S.Ct. 1668, 123 L.Ed.2d 285 (1993) (O'Connor, J., concurring) (quoting . . .
. . . No. 19-1014. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .
. . . See ante , at 1013 - 1014. . . .
. . . Woodford, 290 F.3d 1006, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002) )). . . .
. . . Ct. at 1014. . . . Ct. at 1014. . . . Ct. at 1014. . . .
. . . Additional legal background...1013 1) Hearsay...1013 2) Waiver and inadequate briefing...1014 3) Forfeiture . . . ...1014 iii. . . . Analysis...1014 1) The McKelvey Report-Waiver...1014 2) The OSBI Report-Forfeiture...1015 3) Transcript . . .
. . . Ct. 2608, 201 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2018) ; United States v. Bryan , 868 F.2d 1032, 1036 (9th Cir. 1989). . . .
. . . United States , 826 F.3d 1014, 1016 (8th Cir. 2016). . . . Id. at 1016 ; see also Walker, 900 F.3d at 1014 n.2. . . .
. . . See id. at 1014 (O'Neill, J., dissenting). . . .
. . . Microsoft Corp. , 922 F.3d 1014, 1018 & n.4 (9th Cir. 2019). . . .
. . . Id . at 995, 1014. . . .
. . . MindGeek, s.a.r.l. , 859 F.3d 1014, 1019 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (citing TecSec, Inc. v. Int'l Bus. Machs. . . .
. . . Libby, 880 F.3d 1011, 1014, 1016 (8th Cir. 2018) (stating that aggravated robbery involves the "commission . . .
. . . . §§ 1006, 1014 ). . . .
. . . Hogg County, 730 F.2d 1009, 1014 (5th Cir. 1984) ). . . .
. . . Gonzales , 485 F.3d 1014, 1026 (8th Cir. 2007) ). . . .
. . . Chicago Park Dist. , 927 F.2d 1014, 1025 (7th Cir. 1991) ("[W]e can affirm the contempt citation without . . .
. . . Gonzales , 485 F.3d 1014, 1030 (8th Cir. 2007). . . .
. . . Luzenac Am., Inc. , 370 F.3d 1014, 1019 (10th Cir. 2004) ("As a reviewing court, we may only 'evaluate . . .
. . . Walker , 677 F.2d 1014 (4th Cir. 1982), we relied on Truong Dinh Hung again to articulate the doctrine . . .
. . . Supp. 2d 1014, 1026-27 (N.D. . . .
. . . Dunaway , 684 F.2d 422, 426 (6th Cir. 1982), cert. denied , 459 U.S. 1171, 103 S.Ct. 816, 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 . . .
. . . Express Corp. , 116 F.3d 1005, 1014 & n.16 (3d Cir. 1997) (emphasizing that named fiduciary in plan instrument . . . Custer , 89 F.3d at 1161 ; and the decisions of our sister circuits, see, e.g. , Jordan , 116 F.3d at 1014 . . .
. . . E.P.A. , 537 F.3d 1006, 1014 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. . . .
. . . United States, 900 F.3d 1012, 1014 (8th Cir. 2018). . . .
. . . Schumacher & Co. , 37 F.3d 996, 1014 (3d Cir.1994) ). 1. . . . Dkt. 47 at 6 n.2 (citing InterVest , 340 F.3d at 158 n.8 ; Alvord-Polk , 37 F.3d at 1014 ). . . . Id. at 1013 ; see also id. at 1014 ("we cannot, in this case, permit appellants to do under common law . . . Petty , 23 A.3d at 1014. . . .
. . . City of Santa Monica , 308 F.3d 1008, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002) ). . . .
. . . Ashcroft , 377 F.3d 1014, 1027 (9th Cir. 2004) ). . . .
. . . supertort remedy to supplant existing state remedial procedures"), vacated on other grounds , 494 U.S. 1014 . . . vacated our judgment, and remanded the case back to the en banc court in light of Zinermon . 494 U.S. 1014 . . .
. . . O'Toole , 94 F.3d 1014, 1021 (6th Cir. 1996). . . .
. . . Spurlock , 495 F.3d 1011, 1014 (8th Cir. 2007). . . .
. . . Brown, 551 U.S. 1, 9, 127 S.Ct. 2218, 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2007), the Supreme Court has repeatedly held . . .
. . . Cty. of San Diego , 864 F.3d 1010, 1014 (9th Cir. 2017) (finding triable issue where decedent was armed . . .
. . . ZTE , 890 F.3d at 1014-15. . . .
. . . missing witness Brown, the only eyewitness to identify defendant Lynch as the shooter. 499 F.2d at 1014 . . .
. . . Spurlock, 495 F.3d 1011, 1014 (8th Cir. 2007) ). . . .
. . . Lord , 915 F.3d 1009, 1014 (5th Cir. 2019) (finding that because defendant's "arguments do not go to . . .
. . . MindGeek, s.a.r.l. , 859 F.3d 1014, 1019 (Fed. Cir. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S. . . .
. . . See, e.g., id. at 1014-15. . . .
. . . ABB, Inc. , 521 F.3d 1010, 1014 (8th Cir. 2008), but we have never had occasion to interpret whether . . .
. . . E.P.A. , 537 F.3d 1006, 1014 (9th Cir. 2008). . . .
. . . App. 988-989, 1014. Among the committee's members were the mothers of 10 deceased soldiers. . . . Id. , at 1014. Local businesses and political leaders assisted in this effort. Id., at 1014, 1243. . . .
. . . Microsoft Corp. , 922 F.3d 1014, 1023 (9th Cir. 2019). . . .
. . . Coastal Council , 505 U.S. 1003, 1014-19, 112 S.Ct. 2886, 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992). . . .
. . . Id. at 1014-15. . . .
. . . U.S. 168, 175, 106 S.Ct. 2464, 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986). 551 U.S. 1, 35-36, 127 S.Ct. 2218, 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 . . . Brown , 551 U.S. 1, 7, 127 S.Ct. 2218, 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2007) (citing Witt , 469 U.S. at 430, 105 S.Ct . . . Brown , 551 U.S. 1, 7, 127 S.Ct. 2218, 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2007) (third alteration in original) (quoting . . .
. . . Co. , 379 F.2d 15, 17 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied , 389 U.S. 1014, 88 S.Ct. 590, 19 L.Ed.2d 660 (1967 . . .
. . . Supp. 2d 1014 (E.D. Wis. 2010). . . .
. . . Conigliaro (joined by Carter and Stepanets) filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss Count 3, see Dkt ## 1013, 1014 . . . Dkt # 1014, at 1-2. . . .
. . . Perry Twp. , 128 F.3d 1014, 1022-28 (7th Cir. 1997). . . .
. . . State, 198 So. 3d 1011, 1014 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). . . .
. . . Co. , 121 F.3d 1006, 1014 (6th Cir. 1997) (en banc). The breach of contract claim . . . .
. . . LaSalle Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 80 A.3d 1014, 1023-24 (D.C. 2013) (dismissing breach of contract claim under . . .
. . . (R. 122, Hausman Deposition, PageID # 1014.) . . .
. . . State, 177 So. 3d 1010, 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (reversing summary denial of defendant's rule 3.850 . . .
. . . Pinellas Cty., 894 So.2d 1011, 1014 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). . . .
. . . United States , 668 F.3d 1008, 1014 (8th Cir. 2012). . . .
. . . Liranzo , 729 F.Supp. 1012, 1014 (S.D.N.Y.1990) )). . . .
. . . Rio International Interlink , 284 F.3d 1007, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002), but that case does not address the . . .
. . . Shattuck, 961 F.2d 1012, 1014-15 (1st Cir. 1992). . . .
. . . Butler County , 268 F.3d 1014, 1036 n.16 (11th Cir. 2001) (en banc)). . . .
. . . California , 236 F.3d 1014, 1019 (9th Cir. 2001) (quotation omitted). Rule 9(b) "requires no more." . . .
. . . "replace[ ] agency discretion with a new binding rule of substantive law," Mada-Luna , 813 F.2d at 1014 . . .
. . . State, 235 So.3d 1014, 1016-17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (holding that the State failed to establish the corpus . . .
. . . Supp. 1007, 1014 n.8 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1980), aff'd , 669 F.2d 692 (C.C.P.A. 1982) ). . . .
. . . Shipco Gen., Inc. , 814 F.2d 1011, 1014 (5th Cir. 1987). . . .
. . . D.C. 46, 47, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (1923), was "was superseded by the adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence . . .
. . . Supp. 2d 1008, 1014 (N.D. . . .
. . . Shelter Capital Partners LLC , 718 F.3d 1006, 1014 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Balistreri v. . . .
. . . Raley's Inc., 158 F.3d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir. 1998). . . .
. . . State, 198 So. 3d 1011, 1014 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). . . .
. . . Robins , 788 F.2d at 1014-16. . . .
. . . Shelter Capital Partners LLC , 718 F.3d 1006, 1014 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Balistreri v. . . .
. . . App'x at 1014, 2878, and yet it did not object to MTA's provision of subsequent phases of the system, . . .
. . . Scrap Metal Processors, Inc. , 386 F.3d 993, 1014 (11th Cir. 2004). . . . Parker , 386 F.3d at 1014-15 (quoting Cox v. . . .
. . . Dep't of Educ., Case No. 3:15-1014, 2016 WL 236996, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2016). . . .
. . . Supp. 2d 1014, 1020 (N.D. Cal. 2008) ). . . .
. . . effective assistance of counsel, in violation of due process, by counsel's inept performance. 377 F.3d 1014 . . .
. . . Lincare, Inc., 428 F.3d 1008, 1014 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing Bryant v. . . . Corsello, 428 F.3d at 1014. . . .
. . . Matzkin , 14 F.3d 1014, 1019-20 (4th Cir. 1994) (citations omitted). II. . . .
. . . Jim Hogg Cty. , 730 F.2d 1009, 1014 (5th Cir. 1984) ). . . . Brady , 145 F.3d at 704 (quoting McBee , 730 F.2d at 1014 ). Jordan , 516 F.3d at 296. . . .
. . . California , 236 F.3d 1014, 1019 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Neubronner v. . . .
. . . Services Pension Plan , 837 F.3d 1014 (9th Cir. 2016). . . .
. . . Servs. , 468 So.2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) ). . . .
. . . Matsushita Electric Corp. , 762 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), as "instructive." . . . Torres, 762 So.2d at 1014-18. . . .
. . . State , 948 So.2d 1014, 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that a criminal defendant has the right to maintain . . . Swint , 302 Kan. 326, 352 P.3d 1014, 1029 (2015) (noting court had "approved lack of remorse as appropriate . . .
. . . Harvey , 210 F.3d. at 1014. . . .
. . . Ashcroft , 377 F.3d 1014, 1028 (9th Cir. 2004) (parents and one child); Gebremichael v. . . .
. . . See id. at 1014. . . .
. . . . § 1014 ). I. . . . The statutory language of § 1014 is capacious; it is cast in broad disjunctive terms because "Congress . . . Williams , to establish that promises of future intent cannot be considered false statements under § 1014 . . . However, Williams cannot be read to mean that promises are categorically beyond the reach of § 1014. . . . that a false promise cannot be a false statement sufficient to establish criminal liability under § 1014 . . .
. . . California , 236 F.3d 1014, 1019 (9th Cir. 2001) ). . . .
. . . Id. at 1014. . . . Lockyer , 575 F.3d at 1014. . . . Lockyer , 575 F.3d at 1014. . . .
. . . Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc. , 510 F.2d 1004, 1014 (5th Cir. 1975) ("A trademark is a property right which . . .
. . . See Miles , 247 F.3d at 1014-15 (ordering suppression of a box of ammunition found in a suspect's jacket . . .
. . . No. 18-1014. Supreme Court of the United States April 15, 2019. . . .
. . . United States , 679 F.3d 1013, 1014 (8th Cir. 2012). A. . . .
. . . Garcia , 27 F.3d 1009, 1014 (5th Cir. 1994) ) (bracket original); see also United States v. . . .