
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this Code or in any other law of this state, defined words shall have the meanings specified, unless the context in which the word or term is used clearly requires that a different meaning be used.
- A ward's stepchildren were not "children" under the guardianship statute, nor were they next of kin and, because there were individuals related to the ward by blood, who were not notified of the guardianship proceedings, the appointment of the guardian was void. Wilson v. James, 260 Ga. 234, 392 S.E.2d 5 (1990).
- Non-profit association with the purpose of focusing on public interest matters of self-defense and gun laws of the State of Georgia was not a "person" which could claim to have an interest in the offices held by the Georgia Code Revision Commission members for purposes of pursuing a writ of quo warranto under O.C.G.A. § 9-6-60. No association standing was shown because the interests the association sought to protect were not shown to be germane to its purpose. Georgiacarry.org, Inc. v. Allen, 299 Ga. 716, 791 S.E.2d 800 (2016).
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-11-04
Snippet: charging her with violations of Rules 1.2(a),1 1.3,2 1.4(a), 3 1 Rule 1.2(a) provides, in
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-09-16
Snippet: charging Bonnell with violations of Rules 1.1, 1 1.3, 2 1.4(a),3 1 Rule 1.1 provides that “[a]
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-09-16
Snippet: charging him with violations of Rules 1.2(a), 1 1.3,2 1 Rule 1.2(a) provides, in pertinent part
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-08-12
Snippet: the State Bar since 1996, violated Rules 1.2(a),1 1.3,2 1.4(a)3 and (b)4, 3.2,5 and 9.36 of the Georgia
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-08-12
Snippet: 2 Rules 1.2(a),1 1.3,2 1.4(a),3 1.15(I)(a),4 1.15(I)(b),5 1.15(I)(c),6
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-05-06
Citation: 915 S.E.2d 613, 321 Ga. 402
Snippet: him to “desist.” See Bradford v. State, 285 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (673 SE2d 201) (2009) (“when the phrase challenged
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-12-10
Citation: 320 Ga. 527
Snippet: to believe that Greene violated Rules 1.2 (a),1 1.3,2 1.4 (a) (3) and (4),3 1.5 (a),4 1.16 (d),5 and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-12-10
Snippet: to believe that Greene violated Rules 1.2 (a),1 1.3,2 1.4 (a) (3) and (4),3 1.5 (a),4 1.16 (d),5 and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-09-04
Citation: 906 S.E.2d 413, 319 Ga. 687
Snippet: facts amounted to viola- tions of Rules 1.1,1 1.3,2 1.4 (a),3 1.16 (d),4 and 8.4 (a) (4)5 in SDBD
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-02-20
Citation: 898 S.E.2d 473, 318 Ga. 340
Snippet: ruling on the constitutionality of OCGA § 17-10-1.3. 2. (a) Because the trial court closely tracked
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-09-20
Citation: 878 S.E.2d 537, 314 Ga. 617
Snippet: chose not to.15 See Morris v. State, 284 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (662 SE2d 110) (2008) (no Brady violation where
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-02-15
Citation: 869 S.E.2d 447, 313 Ga. 247
Snippet: (815 SE2d 875) (2018); Ross v. State, 255 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (b) (334 SE2d 300) (1985). Even where the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-04-19
Citation: 857 S.E.2d 690, 311 Ga. 313
Snippet: contribute to verdict); Mitchell v. State, 293 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (742 SE2d 454) (2013) (exclusion of portions of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-04-05
Citation: 857 S.E.2d 447, 311 Ga. 259
Snippet: Walnoha in the yard. See Mitchell v. State, 293 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (742 SE2d 454) (2013) (exclusion of evidence
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-02-01
Citation: 854 S.E.2d 523, 310 Ga. 708
Snippet: Henderson testified. See Mitchell v. State, 293 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (742 SE2d 454) (2013) (exclusion of evidence
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-07-01
Citation: 846 S.E.2d 73, 309 Ga. 337
Snippet: Middleton, 343 Ga. App. XXVII, slip op. at pp. 1- 3. 2. A defendant is not required to object to the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-02-10
Citation: 838 S.E.2d 808, 308 Ga. 10
Snippet: SE2d 778) (1987); Campbell v. State, 181 Ga. App. 1, 3 (2) (351 SE2d 209) (1986), disapproved on other grounds
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-11-04
Citation: 307 Ga. 307
Snippet: Farmer violated Rules 1.2 (a), 1.6 (a), 1.8 (b), 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 (d), 4.4, and 8.4 (a) (1) and (a) (4)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-08-19
Citation: 306 Ga. 567
Snippet: “purely speculative”); Morris v. State, 284 Ga. 1, 3 (2) (662 SE2d 110) (2008) (no Brady violation where
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-06-10
Citation: 306 Ga. 153
Snippet: on defense of habitation. See OCGA § 16-3-23 (1), (3).2 2 Citing Coleman v. State, 286 Ga. 291