Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 19-9-102 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 19-9-102 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 19-9-102

TITLE 19 DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Section 9. Child Custody Proceedings, 19-9-1 through 19-9-134.

ARTICLE 3 UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT

19-9-102. Application.

A motion or other request for relief made in a child custody proceeding or to enforce a child custody determination which was commenced before July 1, 2001, is governed by the law in effect at the time the motion or other request was made.

(Code 1981, §19-9-102, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 129, § 1.)

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2001, "July 1, 2001," was substituted for "the effective date of this article".

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Applicability.

- O.C.G.A. § 19-9-102 applies only to motions and requests made before the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-9-40 et seq., was enacted. Devito v. Devito, 280 Ga. 367, 628 S.E.2d 108 (2006).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 19-9-102

Total Results: 2  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

DeVito v. DeVito, 628 S.E.2d 108 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 27, 2006 | 280 Ga. 367, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 953

...to" that state's equivalent of OCGA §§ 19-9-61 and 19-9-63). The record in this case is devoid of any evidence to support appellant's bald assertion that the initial determination was not consistent with the provisions of the UCCJEA. Nor does OCGA § 19-9-102 help appellant because that provision applies only to motions and requests made before the UCCJEA was enacted....
Copy

Devito v. Devito, 280 Ga. 367 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 27, 2006 | 628 S.E.2d 108

...hat state’s equivalent of OCGA §§ 19-9-61 and 19-9-63). The record in this case is devoid of any evidence to support appellant’s bald assertion that the initial determination was not consistent with the provisions of the UC-CJEA. Nor does OCGA § 19-9-102 help appellant because that provision applies only to motions and requests made before the UCCJEA was enacted....