Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-82-75 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 82 information not found

ARTICLE 3 REVENUE BONDS

36-82-75. Duty of district attorney or Attorney General to file petition; order to show cause; service of petition and order; answer.

Within 20 days from the date of service of the notice provided for in Code Section 36-82-74, the district attorney or the Attorney General shall prepare and file, in the office of the clerk of the superior court of the county issuing the bonds or of the county in which the governmental body is located, a petition directed to the superior court of such county in the name of the state and against the governmental body desiring to issue the revenue bonds. The petition shall set forth service of the notice, the name of the governmental body seeking to issue the bonds, the amount of bonds to be issued, for what purpose the bonds are to be issued, what interest they are to bear, how much principal and interest is to be paid annually, when the bonds are to be paid in full, and the security to be pledged to the payment of the bonds; provided, however, the petition may provide for a maximum interest rate and a maximum annual principal and interest payment. The district attorney or the Attorney General shall obtain from the judge of the court an order requiring the governmental body by its proper officers to show cause, at such time and place, either in term or chambers, within 20 days from the filing of the petition, as the judge may direct, why the bonds and the security for the payment thereof should not be confirmed and validated. The petition and order shall be served in the manner now provided by law for the service of petitions upon counties, governmental bodies, or political subdivisions. The officers of the governmental body shall make sworn answers to the petition within the time prescribed.

(Ga. L. 1937, p. 761, § 11; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1103, § 1.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

- See Lawson v. City of Moultrie, 194 Ga. 699, 22 S.E.2d 592 (1942).

Effect of failure of solicitor general (now district attorney) to file petition.

- When the solicitor general (now district attorney), or the Attorney General, fails to file a validation petition within the 20-day period, any petition filed, without a prior order of court directing such filing, is a nullity. State v. Smallwood, 103 Ga. App. 400, 119 S.E.2d 297 (1961).

Petition sets forth interest rate with reasonable specificity under the circumstances when the petition states the interest rate "will not exceed 103/4%" and there was testimony at the validation hearing that the interest rate will be set at the time of closing. Alexander v. Macon-Bibb County Urban Dev. Auth. & Urban Properties #47, 257 Ga. 181, 357 S.E.2d 62 (1987).

Citizens of municipality have right to object to validation of revenue bonds on grounds that project is unreasonable or unsound. Miller v. State, 83 Ga. App. 135, 62 S.E.2d 921 (1951).

State a necessary party in intervention in validation proceeding.

- On appeal by intervening taxpayers and citizens from a judgment of the superior court overruling their objections and validating the bonds, the state is a necessary and indispensable party, and, it appearing that the state had not been made a party to the bill of exceptions or served with a copy of the bill of exceptions, the writ of error is properly dismissed. Darby v. City of Vidalia, 75 Ga. App. 804, 44 S.E.2d 454 (1947).

Burden of making out case is on state.

- State is a necessary and indispensable party to an action to require validation of water and sewer revenue anticipation bonds as the express provisions of this section require that the action be brought in its name. The burden of making out the state's case for the validation of the revenue anticipation bonds was upon the state. Darby v. City of Vidalia, 75 Ga. App. 804, 44 S.E.2d 454 (1947) (see O.C.G.A. § 36-82-75).

Cited in Gibbs v. City of Social Circle, 191 Ga. 422, 12 S.E.2d 335 (1940); Dade County v. State, 77 Ga. App. 139, 48 S.E.2d 144 (1948); Rich v. State, 237 Ga. 291, 227 S.E.2d 761 (1976); Nations v. Downtown Dev. Auth., 255 Ga. 324, 338 S.E.2d 240 (1985); Hay v. Newton County, 246 Ga. App. 44, 538 S.E.2d 181 (2000); Citizens for Ethics in Gov't, LLC v. Atlanta Dev. Auth., 303 Ga. App. 724, 694 S.E.2d 680 (2010), cert. denied, No. S10C1350, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 722 (Ga. 2010).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Securities and Obligations, § 353 et seq.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 36-82-75

Total Results: 7  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Savage v. State of Georgia, 297 Ga. 627 (Ga. 2015).

Cited 28 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 29, 2015 | 774 S.E.2d 624

...ng, the statutory purpose has been subserved.’” Avery, 295 Ga. at 634 (citation omitted). The notice of the hearing in this case was sufficient. (b) Pellegrino argues next that the Authority did not fulfill its duty under OCGA § 36-82-75 because it failed to show why the stadium project bonds should not be validated....
...When, as required by OCGA § 36-82-74, a government body notifies the appropriate district attorney that it desires to issue revenue bonds, the district attorney must file a petition setting out details of the bonds, including their amount and purpose, in the superior court of the county issuing the bonds. See OCGA § 36-82-75....
Copy

Sherman v. City of Atlanta, 293 Ga. 169 (Ga. 2013).

Cited 24 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 17, 2013 | 744 S.E.2d 689, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1818

...appeal the trial court’s judgment. See id. (“Only a party to the proceedings at the time the judgment appealed from is rendered may appeal from such judgment.”) Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal. 1. On April 20, 2012, pursuant to OCGA § 36-82-75, the State of Georgia, through the District Attorney for Fulton County, petitioned *170the Fulton County Superior Court for a judgment confirming and validating the issuance by the City of Atlanta of up to $35 million in bonds secured by...
Copy

Nations v. Downtown Dev. Auth., 338 S.E.2d 240 (Ga. 1985).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 11, 1985 | 255 Ga. 324

...(4) the purpose for which the bonds are to be issued, (5) the interest rate, (6) how much principal and interest is to be paid annually, (7) when the bonds are to be paid in full, and (8) the security to be pledged to the payment of the bonds. OCGA § 36-82-75....
Copy

Alexander v. MacOn-bibb Cnty. Urban Dev. Auth. & Urban Props. 47, 357 S.E.2d 62 (Ga. 1987).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 19, 1987 | 257 Ga. 181

...." Miller at 141. We have studied the resolution in this case and find this requirement has been met. The fact that all final blueprints and specifications were not incorporated into the resolution does not require invalidation of the bonds. 4. OCGA § 36-82-75 requires the State to file a petition against the governmental body desiring to issue the bonds which states, inter alia, "the interest [the bonds] are to bear, how much principal and interest is to be paid annually ....
Copy

Clayton Cnty. Airport Auth. v. State, 265 Ga. 24 (Ga. 1995).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 13, 1995 | 453 S.E.2d 8, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 549

Carley, Justice. Pursuant to OCGA § 36-82-75, a petition for judicial validation of revenue bonds was filed in the name of appellee State of Georgia....
Copy

Reed v. State of Georgia, 265 Ga. 458 (Ga. 1995).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 12, 1995 | 458 S.E.2d 113, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 1997

...vidence to support the trial court's finding of feasibility. Reed has demonstrated no error in the finding of feasibility and has shown no violation of the Georgia Revenue Bond Law. *460 Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] See OCGA § 36-82-75 et seq....
Copy

Avery v. State of Georgia, 295 Ga. 630 (Ga. 2014).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 30, 2014 | 761 S.E.2d 56