CopyCited 428 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 21, 1994 | 452 S.E.2d 476, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3818
...waiving sovereign immunity as contemplated by the 1991 amendment. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Par. IX (e). 5. The question then becomes whether Walker County's purchase of a GIRMA coverage agreement as authorized by OCGA §§
36-85-1 to
36-85-20 constitutes the purchase of liability insurance....
...City of Barwick , this court held that a municipality's purchase of a GIRMA liability policy constituted the purchase of liability insurance and waived sovereign immunity to the extent of available coverage. We reached this conclusion after declaring §
36-85-20 unconstitutionally void because it conflicted with the 1983 Constitution's waiver of sovereign immunity to the extent of available liability insurance. [9]
262 Ga. at 132. The conflicting language of the 1983 Constitution now having been eliminated, Millard contends that this court is constrained by §
36-85-20 to hold that the purchase of a GIRMA coverage agreement does not waive sovereign immunity. Although the 1991 amendment eliminated the constitutional language with which §
36-85-20 was deemed inconsistent, this revision did not resurrect the void statute....
...A statute declared unconstitutional is deemed void from its inception and is not revived merely because the constitutional infirmity is subsequently eliminated. Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U. S. 425 (6 SC 1121, 30 LE 178) (1886); James v. City of Blakely,
143 Ga. 117 (84 SE 431) (1915). Accordingly, §
36-85-20 provides no basis for a finding that Walker County's participation in GIRMA is not a waiver of sovereign immunity and our decision in Hiers controls....
...S. 998 (1988). [9] Through its participation in GIRMA, Walker County is authorized to pool its resources and liabilities with other member counties and jointly purchase general liability, motor vehicle liability, or property damage insurance. OCGA §
36-85-2 (a). [10] Section
36-85-20 provided that participation in the plan by a county "shall not constitute the obtaining of liability insurance and no sovereign immunity shall be waived on account of such participation." [] Other cases involving the doctrine of respondeat superior have not dealt with the official immunity of employees....