Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 44-6-205 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 44 PROPERTY

Section 6. Estates, 44-6-1 through 44-6-206.

ARTICLE 9 UNIFORM STATUTORY RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES

44-6-205. Applicability of article; court reform of nonvested dispositions created before article became effective.

  1. Except as extended by subsection (b) of this Code section, this article applies to a nonvested property interest or a power of appointment that is created on or after July 1, 2018. For purposes of this Code section only, a nonvested property interest or a power of appointment created by the exercise of a power of appointment is created when the power is irrevocably exercised or when a revocable exercise becomes irrevocable.
  2. With respect to a nonvested property interest or a power of appointment that was created before July 1, 2018, and that violates this state's rule against perpetuities as that rule existed before July 1, 2018, a court upon the petition of an interested party may exercise its equitable power to reform the disposition in the manner that most closely approximates the transferor's manifested plan of distribution and is within the limits of the rule against perpetuities applicable when the nonvested property interest or power of appointment was created.

(Code 1981, §44-6-205, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1837, § 2; Ga. L. 2018, p. 262, § 3/HB 121.)

The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, substituted "July 1, 2018" for "May 1, 1990" in the first sentence of subsection (a) and twice in subsection (b).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

In general.

- Trial court properly utilized the court's statutory authority under O.C.G.A. § 44-6-205(b) to reform a trust instrument that violated the rule against perpetuities. Scott v. South Trust Asset Mgmt. Co., 274 Ga. 523, 555 S.E.2d 732 (2001).

Cited in Stephens v. Trust for Pub. Land, 475 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ga. 2007); Cartersville Ranch, LLC v. Dellinger, 295 Ga. 195, 758 S.E.2d 781 (2014).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 44-6-205

Total Results: 2  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Cartersville Ranch, LLC v. Dellinger, 295 Ga. 195 (Ga. 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 19, 2014 | 758 S.E.2d 781

...quitable powers of reformation to reform the disposition in a manner that most closely approximates the transferor’s manifested plan of distribution within the limits of the rule against perpetuity in effect when the interest was created. See OCGA § 44-6-205 (b)....
...Georgia, to which reference is hereby made. (Emphasis supplied.) 13 we find Dellinger has requested, and under the facts presented would be entitled to, equitable reformation of the 1918 deed pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-205 (b). As a result, the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Dellinger on this claim. 3....
Copy

Scott v. South Trust Asset Mgmt. Co., 274 Ga. 523 (Ga. 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 30, 2001 | 555 S.E.2d 732, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 3612

...One of the appellees, South Trust Asset Management Company, is trustee of a trust that all the parties agree violates the rule against *524perpetuities. South Trust petitioned the trial court for direction regarding the payment of the assets of the trust. Pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-205 (b),1 the trial court reformed the trust to provide that upon the death of the testator’s son, the lineal descendants of the son would receive the income from the trust for 21 years or until the death of the last surviving lineal descendant, whichever first occurred....
...iving lineal descendants of the son, the corpus would be distributed to two charities named in the testator’s will. Contrary to the appellants’ contention, we conclude that the trial court properly reformed the trust pursuant to the authority of § 44-6-205 (b),2 and, accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Decided November 30, 2001. Crain & Davis, Michael O....
...Lewis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Bloodworth & McSwain, Laurin M. McSwain, James W. Hass, Jr., Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Edward K. Smith, Alex W. Smith, Edward W. Gadrix, Jr., for appellees. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. OCGA § 44-6-205 (b) provides as follows: With respect to a nonvested property interest or a power of appointment that was created before May 1, 1990, and that violates the rule against perpetuities as that rule existed before May 1, 1990, a court upon t...