Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 51-4-4 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 51 TORTS

Section 4. Wrongful Death, 51-4-1 through 51-4-6.

ARTICLE 4 LIABILITY OF SPACE FLIGHT ENTITIES

"WARNING AND AGREEMENT UNDER GEORGIA LAW THERE IS NO LIABILITY FOR INJURY, DEATH, OR OTHER LOSS RESULTING FROM ANY INHERENT RISKS OF SPACE FLIGHT ACTIVITIES. SUCH INHERENT RISKS OF SPACE FLIGHT ACTIVITIES INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE POTENTIAL FOR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY, SICKNESS, PERMANENT DISABILITY, PARALYSIS, AND LOSS OF LIFE; EXPOSURE TO EXTREME CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES; ACCIDENTS, CONTACT, OR COLLISION WITH OTHER SPACE FLIGHT PARTICIPANTS, SPACE FLIGHT VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT; AND DANGERS ARISING FROM ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS AND EQUIPMENT FAILURE.

51-4-4. Wrongful death of child.

The right to recover for the homicide of a child shall be as provided in Code Section 19-7-1.

(Code 1933, § 105-1307, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1154, § 2.)

Law reviews.

- For survey article on wills, trusts, guardianships, and fiduciary administration, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 447 (2007). For note, "Not Just For Kids: Why Georgia's Statutory Disinheritance of Deadbeat Parents Should Extend to Intestate Adults," see 43 Ga. L. Rev. 867 (2009).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

General Consideration

Limit on recovery.

- Recovery for wrongful death in Georgia is limited to the full value of the life without deduction for necessary or personal expenses of decedent and does not include recovery for mental anguish or emotional distress. Ob-Gyn Assocs. v. Littleton, 259 Ga. 663, 386 S.E.2d 146 (1989), overruled on other grounds, Lee v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 272 Ga. 583, 533 S.E.2d 82 (2000), overruled on other grounds, Shores v. Modern Transp. Servs., 262 Ga. App. 293, 585 S.E.2d 664 (2003).

Lack of standing.

- Father lacked standing to recover for the child's wrongful death pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 19-7-1(c) and51-4-4 as the father had abandoned the child pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-7-1(b)(3); the father never supported the child, nor did the father ever visit the child in the many years after the child's hospitalization in infancy, there was no evidence that the father attempted to learn where the child resided in order to initiate visitation or support, and the father was obligated under O.C.G.A. § 19-7-2 to support the child, even though the divorce decree did not require it. Baker v. Sweat, 281 Ga. App. 863, 637 S.E.2d 474 (2006).

The defense of accident is to be confined to its strict sense as an occurrence which takes place in the absence of negligence and for which no one would be liable, unless there is evidence authorizing a finding that the occurrence was an "accident" as thus defined, a charge on that defense is error. Battle v. Kovalski, 202 Ga. App. 471, 414 S.E.2d 700 (1992).

Recovery by parent of deceased when murdered by spouse.

- After the Georgia Supreme Court concluded that because the police officer, as the son's wife and murderer, was precluded from recovery, the son's mother had standing to assert claims for her son's wrongful death and funeral expenses under Georgia law; therefore, the district court erred by dismissing the mother's state law claims. Carringer v. Rodgers, 331 F.3d 844 (11th Cir. 2003).

Nonresident alien parents.

- Because nonresident alien parents of a decedent were entitled to bring an action under O.C.G.A. § 51-4-4, an administratrix did not have standing to pursue the action under O.C.G.A. § 51-4-5. Auto Doors, Inc. v. Zivoluba, 277 Ga. App. 288, 626 S.E.2d 256 (2006).

Divorced parent with custody entitled to cause of action for minor's death.

- The Georgia wrongful death statute in effect between April 4, 1979 and March 25, 1980 gave, at least by necessary implication, a right of action to the divorced parent who had custody of the child during the child's minority, regardless of whether at the time of the death the child was a minor or sui juris. Cain v. Vontz, 703 F.2d 1279 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited in DeLoach v. Floyd, 160 Ga. App. 728, 288 S.E.2d 65 (1981); Childers v. Tauber, 160 Ga. App. 713, 288 S.E.2d 5 (1981); Adams v. Wright, 162 Ga. App. 550, 293 S.E.2d 446 (1982); Solomon v. Sapp, 169 Ga. App. 267, 312 S.E.2d 166 (1983); Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 171 Ga. App. 331, 319 S.E.2d 470 (1984); Stegman v. Horton Homes, Inc., 843 F. Supp. 707 (M.D. Ga. 1994).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Effect of death of beneficiary upon right of action under death statute, 13 A.L.R.4th 1060.

Recovery of damages for grief or mental anguish resulting from death of child - modern cases, 45 A.L.R.4th 234.

Excessive and adequacy of damages for personal injuries resulting in death of minor, 49 A.L.R.4th 1076.

Wrongful death: surviving parent's minority as tolling limitation period on suit for child's wrongful death, 54 A.L.R.4th 362.

Workers' compensation act as precluding tort action for injury to or death of employee's unborn child, 55 A.L.R.4th 792.

Excessiveness or adequacy of damages awarded for parents' noneconomic loss caused by personal injury or death of child, 61 A.L.R.4th 413.

Effect of death of beneficiary, following wrongful death, upon damages, 73 A.L.R.4th 441.

Recovery of damages for loss of consortium resulting from death of child - modern status, 77 A.L.R.4th 411.

Who, other than parent, may recover for loss of consortium on death of minor child, 84 A.L.R.5th 687.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 51-4-4

Total Results: 7  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

OB-Gyn Assocs. of Albany v. Littleton, 386 S.E.2d 146 (Ga. 1989).

Cited 98 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 5, 1989 | 259 Ga. 663

...Plaintiffs/appellees Littleton sued appellants for the allegedly negligent delivery of their infant daughter which resulted in the baby's death two days after delivery. They sued in four counts: Count 1 was for the wrongful death of the daughter under OCGA §§ 19-7-1(c) and 51-4-4; counts 2 and 3 were for loss of her services and for money paid to defendants for services; count 4 was for the mother's mental suffering and emotional distress....
...e injuries. 1. Recovery for wrongful death in Georgia is limited to the full value of the life without deduction for necessary or personal expenses of decedent and does not include recovery for mental anguish or emotional distress. OCGA §§ 19-7-1; 51-4-4; 51-4-1....
Copy

Miles v. Ashland Chem. Co., 410 S.E.2d 290 (Ga. 1991).

Cited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 15, 1991 | 261 Ga. 726

...result of negligence. The individuals who may recover include: a surviving spouse, or if no surviving spouse a child or children may recover for the homicide of a parent, OCGA § 51-4-2(a), (b); a parent may recover for the homicide of a child, OCGA § 51-4-4; if no person is entitled to bring an action pursuant to OCGA §§ 51-4-2 or 51-4-4, then the personal representative may recover for the homicide, OCGA § 51-4-5(a)....
Copy

Carringer v. Rodgers, 578 S.E.2d 841 (Ga. 2003).

Cited 29 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 24, 2003 | 276 Ga. 359, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 961

..., OCGA § 51-4-1 et seq. Tolbert v. Maner, 271 Ga. 207, 208(1), 518 S.E.2d 423 (1999), citing Edenfield v. Jackson, 251 Ga. 491, 492, 306 S.E.2d 911 (1983). Accordingly, the language of the Act is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning. Id. OCGA § 51-4-4 governs recovery for the wrongful death of a child and provides, "The right to recover for the homicide of a child shall be as provided in Code Section 19-7-1." OCGA § 19-7-1(c) provides in pertinent part: (1) In every case of the homicide...
...wton's estate. [4] OCGA § 51-4-5 authorizes recovery by a personal representative for wrongful death and for certain expenses: (a) When there is no person entitled to bring an action for the wrongful death of a decedent under Code Section 51-4-2 or 51-4-4, the administrator or executor of the decedent may bring an action for and may recover and hold the amount recovered for the benefit of the next of kin....
...657, 238 S.E.2d 361 (1977) (holding no cause of action for wrongful death under strict liability); Odom v. Atlanta & W.P.R. Co., 208 Ga. 45, 64 S.E.2d 889 (1951) (rejecting children's right of action while their father's widow lives). [6] See OCGA § 51-4-4....
Copy

Cooksey v. Landry, 295 Ga. 430 (Ga. 2014).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 30, 2014 | 761 S.E.2d 61

...of Christopher’s psychiatric records. Conceding that there exists no statutory authority requiring Dr. Cooksey to produce the records, they argued that they have a right to bring a civil claim against Dr. Cooksey, see OCGA § 51-1-27 and OCGA § 51-4-4, that the psychiatrist-patient privilege found in OCGA § 3 24-5-501 (a) impedes their right by protecting psychiatric-patient communications from disclosure, and therefore, the legal processes available to them provide an inadequate remedy....
Copy

Matter of Kennedy, 466 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. 1996).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 8, 1996 | 266 Ga. 249, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 161

Copy

Hamon v. Connell, 883 S.E.2d 785 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 7, 2023 | 315 Ga. 760

...The parties disagree, however, as to whether these equitable principles apply with equal force to a 5 Under the Act, if there is not a surviving spouse or children, “the right of recovery shall be in the parent or parents.” OCGA § 19-7-1 (c) (2). See also OCGA § 51-4-4 (“The right to recover for the homicide of a child shall be as provided in Code Section 19-7-1 and Code Section 53-1-5.”). And if the decedent leaves no surviving spouse, child, or parent, the Act provides as follows: When there is no person entitled to bring an action for the wrongful death of a decedent under Code Section 51-4-2 or 51-4-4, the administrator or executor of the decedent may bring an action for and may recover and hold the amount recovered for the benefit of the next of kin....

Cooksey v. Landry (Ga. 2014).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 30, 2014 | 315 Ga. 760

...of Christopher’s psychiatric records. Conceding that there exists no statutory authority requiring Dr. Cooksey to produce the records, they argued that they have a right to bring a civil claim against Dr. Cooksey, see OCGA § 51-1-27 and OCGA § 51-4-4, that the psychiatrist-patient privilege found in OCGA § 24-5-501 (a) impedes their right by protecting psychiatric-patient 3 communications from disclosure, and therefore, the legal processes available to them provide an inadequate remedy....