Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Code or in an Act or resolution of the General Assembly, in the event any title, chapter, article, part, subpart, Code section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Code or of any Act or resolution of the General Assembly is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of this Code or of such Act or resolution, which shall remain of full force and effect as if such portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional were not originally a part of this Code or of such Act or resolution. The General Assembly declares that it would have enacted the remaining parts of this Code if it had known that such portion hereof would be declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. The General Assembly further declares that it would have enacted the remaining parts of any other Act or resolution if it had known that such portion thereof would be declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional unless such Act or resolution contains an express provision to the contrary.
- The presence of a severability clause in an Act reverses the usual presumption that the General Assembly intends the Act to be an entirety and creates an opposite presumption of separability. City Council v. Mangelly, 243 Ga. 358, 254 S.E.2d 315 (1979).
Cited in Georgia Ass'n of Educators v. Harris, 749 F. Supp. 1110 (N.D. Ga. 1990); Jekyll Island-State Park Auth. v. Jekyll Island Citizens Ass'n, 266 Ga. 152, 464 S.E.2d 808 (1996).
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-12-10
Snippet: cause to believe that Greene violated Rules 1.2 (a),1 1.3,2 1.4 (a) (3) and (4),3 1.5 (a),4 1.16 (d),5 and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-09-04
Snippet: 2011, be disbarred for his violations of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 (d), and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-01-17
Snippet: disciplinary order that Breault had violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.6, and 1.16 of the GRPC, and disciplined Breault
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-09-06
Snippet: and Review Board that Tuggle violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 (d), 8.4 (a) (4), and 9.2 of the GRPC
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-05-31
Snippet: the maximum penalty for a violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment, while the maximum
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-02-04
Citation: 823 S.E.2d 811, 305 Ga. 133
Snippet: (2011) (disbarring lawyer for violations of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.16, 3.2, and 9.3); and In the Matter
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-02-01
Citation: 298 Ga. 435, 782 S.E.2d 444, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 108
Snippet: above described actions, he has violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5 (c) (1). The maximum penalty for a violation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-02-01
Snippet: above described actions, he has violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5 (c) (1). The maximum penalty for a violation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-01-20
Snippet: at subsection (e). See Ga. L. 2014, p. 445, § 1-1. 3 Specifically, life without parole is
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-01-20
Citation: 296 Ga. 364, 768 S.E.2d 461
Snippet: at subsection (e). See Ga. L. 2014, p. 445, §1-1. 3 Specifically, life without parole is
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-01
Citation: 291 Ga. 654, 732 S.E.2d 755, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2892, 2012 WL 4475848, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 754
Snippet: (2011) (attorney disbarred for violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.16 (a), (c), (d), 3.2, 8.4 (a) (3), and 9.3);
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-09-10
Citation: 291 Ga. 555, 731 S.E.2d 672, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2773, 2012 WL 3889109, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 698
Snippet: immediately points to the question at issue.” OCGA § 24-1-1 (3). With his final breath, the victim stated that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-10-17
Citation: 717 S.E.2d 217, 289 Ga. 912, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3166, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 814
Snippet: found that by this conduct Brown violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16(a)(1), (2), (c), (d), 3.2, 8.4(a)(3)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-10-03
Citation: 716 S.E.2d 219, 289 Ga. 831, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3034, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 728
Snippet: petition Ms. Wofford admits to violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, 5.3 and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-09-12
Citation: 715 S.E.2d 131, 289 Ga. 744, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2836, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 676
Snippet: Allan Evans (State Bar No. 252095) violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.16, 3.2 and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-03-25
Citation: 709 S.E.2d 262, 289 Ga. 19, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 927, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 275
Snippet: State Disciplinary Board Docket Numbers, of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.7, 1.16, 3.2, 5.5 and 9.3 of the Rules
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-29
Citation: 692 S.E.2d 360, 286 Ga. 864, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1020, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 284
Snippet: “immediately points to the question at issue.” OCGA § 24-1-1 (3). See also International Business Machines v. Bozardt
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-05-18
Citation: 677 S.E.2d 132, 285 Ga. 400, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1680, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 246
Snippet: which conduct constitutes violations of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16(d), and 9.3 of the Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-02-09
Citation: 285 Ga. 47, 673 S.E.2d 234, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 420, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 38
Snippet: complaint charged Dekle with violations of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3, of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-06-02
Citation: 662 S.E.2d 124, 283 Ga. 581, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1845, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 447
Snippet: direct and circumstantial evidence under OCGA § 24-1-1(3) and (4); presumption of innocence; burden of proof;