
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1968, p. 1364, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 7, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 984, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 985, § 2.)
- Ga. L. 1985, p. 984, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that that Act would apply to general Acts affecting the compensation of the county officers listed in Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. I, Para. III which are enacted after January 1, 1986.
- The amendment to the kidnapping statute, O.C.G.A. § 16-5-40, providing that slight movement is sufficient to prove kidnapping as long as the movement was not incidental to another offense, and defining what actions would not be incidental to another offense, applies to crimes committed on or after the revised statute's effective date, July 1, 2009, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 1-3-4. Decoteau v. State, 302 Ga. App. 451, 691 S.E.2d 328 (2010).
Cited in Pruitt v. State, 123 Ga. App. 659, 182 S.E.2d 142 (1971); Lott v. State, 123 Ga. App. 781, 182 S.E.2d 546 (1971); Gunn v. Balkcom, 228 Ga. 802, 188 S.E.2d 500 (1972); J.C. Penney Co. v. Malouf Co., 125 Ga. App. 832, 189 S.E.2d 453 (1972); Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp., 125 Ga. App. 845, 189 S.E.2d 459 (1972); J & L Oil Co. v. City of Carrollton, 230 Ga. 817, 199 S.E.2d 190 (1973); Jones v. Caldwell, 230 Ga. 775, 199 S.E.2d 248 (1973); Geiger v. State, 129 Ga. App. 488, 199 S.E.2d 861 (1973); Montaquila v. Cranford, 129 Ga. App. 787, 201 S.E.2d 335 (1973); Brinks v. State, 232 Ga. 13, 205 S.E.2d 247 (1974); DeKalb County v. Chapel Hill, Inc., 232 Ga. 238, 205 S.E.2d 864 (1974); Kenner v. MacDougall, 232 Ga. 273, 206 S.E.2d 519 (1974); White v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 131 Ga. App. 630, 206 S.E.2d 576 (1974); Smith v. State, 132 Ga. App. 199, 207 S.E.2d 681 (1974); Johnson v. State, 134 Ga. App. 67, 213 S.E.2d 170 (1975); Brown v. Ricketts, 233 Ga. 809, 213 S.E.2d 672 (1975); Screamer Mt. Dev., Inc. v. Garner, 234 Ga. 590, 216 S.E.2d 801 (1975); Town of Lyerly v. Short, 234 Ga. 877, 218 S.E.2d 588 (1975); Lanthrip v. State, 235 Ga. 10, 218 S.E.2d 771 (1975); Whitehead v. Hasty, 235 Ga. App. 331, 219 S.E.2d 443 (1975); Fowler v. State, 235 Ga. 535, 221 S.E.2d 9 (1975); Carrindine v. Ricketts, 236 Ga. 283, 223 S.E.2d 627 (1976); Morris v. Morris, 244 Ga. 120, 259 S.E.2d 65 (1979); Searcy v. State, 162 Ga. App. 695, 291 S.E.2d 557 (1982); Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co. v. Central Rigging & Contracting Corp., 684 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir. 1982); American Booksellers Ass'n v. Webb, 590 F. Supp. 677 (N.D. Ga. 1984); Robinson v. State, 180 Ga. App. 43, 348 S.E.2d 662 (1986); Duke v. State, 298 Ga. App. 719, 681 S.E.2d 174 (2009); Smith v. State, 302 Ga. App. 222, 690 S.E.2d 867 (2010); Smith v. State, 312 Ga. App. 174, 718 S.E.2d 43 (2011); City of Brookhaven v. City of Chamblee, 329 Ga. App. 346, 765 S.E.2d 33 (2014); City of Atlanta v. Mays, 301 Ga. 367, 801 S.E.2d 1 (2017); Abrams v. Laughlin, 304 Ga. 34, 816 S.E.2d 26 (2018).
- A retroactive effective date clause in an Act is meaningless and void, in which event this Code section supplies the effective date, the same as if no effective date had been specified in the Act. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-76.
- 73 Am. Jur. 2d, Statutes, § 360 et seq.
- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, § 388 et seq.
- At what stage does a statute or ordinance pass beyond the power of legislative body to reconsider or recall, 96 A.L.R. 1309.
Date or event contemplated by term "passage," "enactment," "effective date," etc., employed by statute in fixing time of facts or conditions within its operation, 132 A.L.R. 1048.
Warning: 'results' key not found in API response
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-03-04
Citation: 321 Ga. 256
Snippet: admitted by default to violations of Rules 1.2 (a),3 1.3,4 and 1.4 (a)5 of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-03-04
Snippet: admitted by default to violations of Rules 1.2 (a),3 1.3,4 and 1.4 (a),5 of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2025-02-18
Citation: 912 S.E.2d 547, 320 Ga. 785
Snippet: (containing no provision for effective date); OCGA § 1-3-4 (a) (1) (unless otherwise specified in the act
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-12-20
Citation: 910 S.E.2d 555, 320 Ga. 558
Snippet: 4:00 a.m. the following day.). See also OCGA § 15-1-3 (4) (“Every court has power . . . [t]o control, in
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-05-29
Citation: 902 S.E.2d 551, 319 Ga. 114
Snippet: of a crime or upon a plea of guilty.” OCGA § 16-1-3 (4). 8 proceedings[
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-03-05
Citation: 899 S.E.2d 126, 318 Ga. 600
Snippet: that David-Vega knowingly violated Rules 1.2,3 1.3,4 1.4 (a),5 1.5 (c),6 1.16 3 GRPC Rule 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-03-15
Citation: 885 S.E.2d 725, 315 Ga. 876
Snippet: with a judicial proceeding before it.” OCGA § 15-1-3 (4), (6). In short, even absent a right to hybrid
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-03-07
Citation: 884 S.E.2d 906, 315 Ga. 767
Snippet: was entered by the trial court. See OCGA § 16-1-3 (4) (defining “conviction” as “a final judgment of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-03-07
Citation: 315 Ga. 767
Snippet: was entered by the trial court. See OCGA § 16-1-3 (4) (defining “conviction” as “a final judgment of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-08-23
Citation: 314 Ga. 498
Snippet: 15 (537 SE2d 663) (2000). See also OCGA § 16-1- 3 (4) (defining “conviction” as including “a final
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-08-23
Snippet: 15 (537 SE2d 663) (2000). See also OCGA § 16-1- 3 (4) (defining “conviction” as including “a final
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-06-01
Citation: 874 S.E.2d 52, 313 Ga. 811
Snippet: Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 186 FRD 1, 3-4 (II) (A) (D. D.C. 1998) (evaluating seniority
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-02-01
Citation: 854 S.E.2d 513, 310 Ga. 743
Snippet: 193, 196 (1) n.4 (787 SE2d 202) (2016); OCGA § 16-1-3 (4). Turning to Allen’s malice murder conviction
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-12-21
Citation: 853 S.E.2d 120, 310 Ga. 652
Snippet: non-existent convictions are moot). See also OCGA § 16-1-3 (4) (“‘Conviction’ includes a final judgment of conviction
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-11-12
Citation: 310 Ga. 443
Snippet: non-existent convictions are moot). See also OCGA § 16-1-3 (4) (“‘Conviction’ includes a final judgment of conviction
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-09-28
Citation: 852 S.E.2d 816, 310 Ga. 114
Snippet: local government entity.” Former OCGA § 36-92-1 (3), (4). In Davis, the Court of Appeals – relying on
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-05-18
Citation: 843 S.E.2d 537, 308 Ga. 806
Snippet: every matter appertaining thereto[.]” OCGA § 15-1-3 (4). See Zant v. Brantley, 261 Ga. 817, 818 (1) (411
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-03-13
Citation: 840 S.E.2d 385, 308 Ga. 296
Snippet: a claim of immunity. See Ga. L. 2014, p. 599, § 1-3.4 Thus, at the times pertinent to this case, felons
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-02-10
Citation: 308 Ga. 283
Snippet: making its decision. See Mitchell v. State, 293 Ga. 1, 3-4 (3) (742 SE2d 454) (2013) (“However, not all comments
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-12-23
Citation: 307 Ga. 587
Snippet: non-existent convictions are moot). See also OCGA § 16-1-3 (4) (“‘Conviction’