Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §10-13-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1999, p. 725, § 1.)
§ 10-13A-4(b). - Trial court committed an error of law by affirming a decision of the Georgia Attorney General (AG) that a cigarette manufacturer was not a tobacco product manufacturer under the Georgia Qualifying Statute, O.C.G.A. § 10-13-2(9), and, therefore, could not sell cigarettes under its brand name in Georgia since the AG's decision was based in part on a misinterpretation of O.C.G.A. § 10-13A-4(b) and the AG's retention of the ability to have the manufacturer cure any certification deficiencies. Carolina Tobacco Co. v. Baker, 295 Ga. App. 115, 670 S.E.2d 811 (2008).
- Validity, construction, application, and effect of master settlement agreement (MSA) between tobacco companies and various states, and state statutes implementing agreement; use and distribution of MSA proceeds, 25 A.L.R.6th 435.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-09-12
Citation: 299 Ga. 655, 791 S.E.2d 5, 90 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 957, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 588
Snippet: reject SunTrust’s invitation to hold that OCGA § 10-1-31 (a) (9)’s definition of a “retail installment contract”
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-11-23
Citation: 686 S.E.2d 777, 286 Ga. 245, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3663, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 735
Snippet: All with emphasis supplied, see, e.g., OCGA §§ 10-1-31 (a) (4) (as used in article on sales financing
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-03-12
Citation: 353 S.E.2d 510, 256 Ga. 790, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 657
Snippet: definition of "motor vehicle" appearing at OCGA § 10-1-31 (a) (4). E.g., Holder v. Brock, 129 Ga. App. 732