Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The following securities are exempt from the requirements of Article 3 of this chapter and Code Section 10-5-53:
(Code 1981, §10-5-10, enacted by Ga. L. 2008, p. 381, § 1/SB 358.)
- Securities laws exemption for opening and transferring of deposits in building and loan associations and savings and loan associations, § 7-1-787.
- For article on the definition of a security in light of the "Georgia Securities Act of 1973" and the need for maximizing investor protection, see 30 Emory L.J. 73 (1981). For comment, the purchase of all the shares of stock of a business is not the purchase of a "Security" within the meaning of the Federal Securities Act of 1933 or the Georgia Securities Act of 1973, see 30 Emory L.J. 1212 (1981).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Ga. L. 1957, p. 134, former Code 1933, § 97-108, and former O.C.G.A. § 10-5-8, as amended, which were subsequently repealed but were succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Exempted transactions specifying "promissory notes" only must be narrowly viewed since the law was remedial legislation entitled to a broad construction. Blau v. Redmond, 143 Ga. App. 897, 240 S.E.2d 273 (1977) (decided under former Code 1933, § 97-108).
Exemptions from registration are to be strictly construed in favor of investors and one claiming an exemption has the burden of proving the exemption's application. Womack v. State, 270 Ga. 56, 507 S.E.2d 425 (1998) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 10-5-8).
- Unregistered status of stock in a closely-held corporation did not negate the stock's character as a security since the Georgia and federal securities acts contemplate that stock may be a "security" and yet be unregistered. Cohen v. William Goldberg & Co., 262 Ga. 606, 423 S.E.2d 231 (1992) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 10-5-8).
- Exemption for promissory notes maturing in not more than nine months in paragraph (9) of this section was explicit as to the type of security and was indicative that it was applicable to high quality commercial paper. Blau v. Redmond, 143 Ga. App. 897, 240 S.E.2d 273 (1977) (decided under former Code 1933, § 97-108).
- Exemption from registration for promissory notes under former paragraph (9) of O.C.G.A. § 10-5-8 did not apply to notes issued by a corporation, although the corporate notes did not mature more than nine months from the date of issuance as required by the exemption, since the notes had all the characteristics of a security and were offered to the public as investments. Womack v. State, 270 Ga. 56, 507 S.E.2d 425 (1998) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 10-5-8).
Cited in Hirsch v. Equilateral Assocs., 245 Ga. 373, 264 S.E.2d 885 (1980).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Ga. L. 1957, p. 134, former Code 1933, § 97-108, and former O.C.G.A. § 10-5-8, as amended, which were subsequently repealed but were succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- It did not necessarily follow that a scheme which constituted a "security" under former Code 1933, § 97-102 must always be registered with the commissioner of securities; if a scheme fell within any of the exemptions provided in former Code 1933, § 97-108 or if the sale of such a scheme fits any of the exempt transactions set forth in former Code 1933, § 97-109, the registration requirements of the law would not apply. 1973 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 73-100 (decided under former Ga. L. 1957, p. 134, as amended).
- If the formation of an investment club were essentially the same as that for a limited partnership, such an interest would be a "security," since the offering for sale of limited partnerships constitutes the offering for sale of a "security" as the security was defined by former Code 1933, § 97-102; unless exempted or involved in an exempt transaction, such securities must be registered. 1969 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 69-328 (decided under former Ga. L. 1957, p. 134, as amended).
- Sales of mortgages described in paragraph (10) of former Code 1933, § 97-108 were exempt from the registration requirement of former Code 1933, § 97-105, but mortgage offerings which were structured or promoted in such a way that they become investment contracts must be registered pursuant to former Code 1933, § 97-105 unless the mortgages qualify for some exemption from registration other than paragraph (10) of former Code 1933, § 97-108. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 74-153 (decided under former Code 1933, § 97-108).
- Sale of time-sharing units in a condominium when coupled with a rental pool or other profit-sharing arrangement constitutes a "security" within the definition of former Code 1933, § 97-102 and, unless exempt, must be registered pursuant to the law. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-75 (decided under former Code 1933, § 97-108).
Variable annuity contract is subject to regulation as a security. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 448 (decided under former Ga. L. 1957, p. 134, as amended).
"Security" does not include variable annuity contracts provided for and regulated under the insurance law. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 70-22 (decided under Ga. L. 1957, p. 134, as amended).
- 69A Am. Jur. 2d, Securities Regulation - State, § 64 et seq.
- 79A C.J.S., Securities Regulation and Commodity Futures Trading Regulation, § 491 et seq.
- Sales as "isolated" or "successive" or the like, under state securities Acts, 1 A.L.R.3d 614.
What securities are exempt from registration under § 402(a) of the Uniform Securities Act, 84 A.L.R.3d 575.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-02-05
Citation: 425 S.E.2d 282, 262 Ga. 704, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 492, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 194
Snippet: see also 2 ABA, Standards for Criminal Justice 10-5.10 (d) & (e) (Supp. 1986) (requiring prosecuting attorney