O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-9-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Geo. L. Smith II Georgia World Congress Center Act.”

History

Ga. L. 1974, p. 174, § 1; Code 1981,

§ 10-9-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 1122, § 1; Ga. L. 2017, p. 774, § 10/HB 323.

Annotations

The 2017 amendment, effective May 9, 2017, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, substituted "This chapter shall be known and may be cited" for "This chapter may be known and cited" at the beginning of this Code section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–2001 · leading case: George L. Smith II Georgia World Cong. Ctr. Auth. v. Soft Comdex, Inc., 550 S.E.2d 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
George L. Smith II Georgia World Cong. Ctr. Auth. v. Soft Comdex, Inc., 550 S.E.2d 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Smith II Georgia World Congress Center Act, OCGA § 10-9-1 et seq., which established the Authority and its oversight of a State-owned international trade and convention center project.”
Exposition Enter., Inc. v. George L. Smith II Georgia World Cong. Ctr. Auth., 338 S.E.2d 726 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “” The statutory provisions regarding the Authority are embodied in OCGA § 10-9-1 et seq. The provisions pertinent to this case read as follows: “The management of the business and affairs of the authority shall be vested in the board of governors, subject to the provisions of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.