Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 11-1-101 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 11-1-101 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 11-1-101

TITLE 11 COMMERCIAL CODE

Section 1. General Provisions, 11-1-101 through 11-1-209.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

11-1-101. Short titles.

  1. This Title 11 shall be known as and may be cited as the "Uniform Commercial Code."
  2. This article shall be known as and may be cited as the "Uniform Commercial Code - General Provisions."

(Code 1933, § 109A-1 - 101, enacted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1; Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 3A-1/SB 65.)

The 2015 amendment, effective January 1, 2016, designated the existing provisions as subsection (a), and added subsection (b).

Law reviews.

- For article, "The Good Faith Purchase Idea and the Uniform Commercial Code," see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 605 (1981).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Effect of prior case law.

- Cases dealing with rescission and with measure of damages for breach of warranty decided prior to the adoption O.C.G.A. § 11-1-101 in 1962 are not controlling in cases arising under O.C.G.A. § 11-1-101. Jacobs v. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 125 Ga. App. 462, 188 S.E.2d 250 (1972).

Cited in Tidwell v. Slocumb (In re Ga. Steel, Inc.), 71 Bankr. 903 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1987); AgriCommodities, Inc. v. J. D. Heiskell & Co., 297 Ga. App. 210, 676 S.E.2d 847 (2009); Sun Nurseries, Inc. v. Lake Erma, LLC, 316 Ga. App. 832, 730 S.E.2d 556 (2012).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 11 Am. Jur. 2d, Bills and Notes, § 5.

6 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Commercial Code, § 1:1.

C.J.S.

- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, §§ 217 et seq., 238.

U.L.A.

- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 1-101.

ALR.

- Recognition of action for damages for wrongful foreclosure - general views, 81 A.L.R.6th 161.

Recognition of action for damages for wrongful foreclosure - types of actions, 82 A.L.R.6th 43.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 11-1-101 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 4

City of Bremen v. Regions Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-02-04

Citation: 559 S.E.2d 440, 274 Ga. 733, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 343, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 50

Snippet: affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] OCGA § 11-1-101 et seq. [2] The City Attorney did not issue a

NEC Technologies, Inc. v. Nelson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-11-25

Citation: 478 S.E.2d 769, 267 Ga. 390, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 4136, 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 992, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 935

Snippet: Commercial Code and the Georgia UCC, see OCGA § 11-1-101 et seq., contain no definition of "unconscionability

Skott v. Bank of America Illinois

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-04-08

Citation: 468 S.E.2d 359, 266 Ga. 532, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1306, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 130

Snippet: Schildhammer, James C. West III, for appellees. OCGA § 11-1-101 et seq.

Jackson Electric Membership Corp. v. Georgia Power Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-02-04

Citation: 364 S.E.2d 556, 257 Ga. 772, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 61

Snippet: [3] Compare Uniform Commercial Code, OCGA § 11-1-101 et seq., "[e]very contract or duty within this