Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 11-2-101 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 11 COMMERCIAL CODE

Section 2. Sales, 11-2-101 through 11-2-725.

ARTICLE 2 SALES

11-2-101. Short title.

This article shall be known and may be cited as "Uniform Commercial Code - Sales."

(Code 1933, § 109A-2 - 101, enacted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1.)

Law reviews.

- For article, "The Good Faith Purchase Idea and the Uniform Commercial Code," see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 605 (1981). For comment, "Medical Expert Systems and Publisher Liability: A Cross-Contextual Analysis," see 43 Emory L.J. 731 (1994).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Coverage of article.

- Article 2 of the Georgia Commercial Code, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-101 et seq., applied to a contract because the sale of goods, the dirt which the seller offered to furnish to the buyer, was the predominant purpose of the contemplated transaction. Furthermore, the trial court did not err in putting the question of predominant purpose to the jury because the evidence permitted a rational jury to resolve this issue in a way that would lead to a conclusion that the sale of goods under O.C.G.A. § 11-2-107(1) was the predominant purpose of the contemplated transaction. Paramount Contr. Co. v. DPS Indus., 309 Ga. App. 113, 709 S.E.2d 288 (2011).

Cited in Rollins Communications, Inc. v. Georgia Inst. of Real Estate, Inc., 140 Ga. App. 448, 231 S.E.2d 397 (1976); Citicorp Indus. Credit, Inc. v. Rountree, 185 Ga. App. 417, 364 S.E.2d 65 (1987); Jones v. Baran Co., LLC, 290 Ga. App. 578, 660 S.E.2d 420 (2008).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Commercial Code, § 69. 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Works and Contracts, § 17.

6 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Commercial Code, § 2:2.

C.J.S.

- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, §§ 217 et seq., 238.

U.L.A.

- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 2-101.

ALR.

- Preemption of strict liability in tort by provisions of UCC Article 2, 15 A.L.R.4th 791.

Impracticability of performance of sales contract under UCC § 2-615, 55 A.L.R.5th 1.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 11-2-101 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 10

Accessory Overhaul Group, Inc. v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.

Court: N.D. Ga. | Date Filed: 2014-01-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 994 F. Supp. 2d 1296

Snippet: their aircraft. Article 2 of the UCC, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-101 et seq., applies “only to transactions in goods

Jones v. Baran Co., LLC

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-03-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 660 S.E.2d 420, 290 Ga. App. 578

Snippet: #x27;s Uniform Commercial Code — Sales (OCGA § 11-2-101 et seq.) and sought compensatory damages and attorney

Almand v. Reynolds & Robin, PC

Court: M.D. Ga. | Date Filed: 2007-05-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 485 F. Supp. 2d 1361

Snippet: sale of motor vehicles," cites O.C.G.A. § 11-2-101 and concludes that an "action for breach

Rodgers v. General Motors Corp.

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-02-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 277 Ga. App. 547, 627 S.E.2d 151

Snippet: under Georgia’s Uniform Commercial Code, OCGA§ 11-2-101 et seq.; and (2) that Rodgers’ Magnuson-Moss Warranty

Culberson v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-06-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 274 Ga. App. 89, 616 S.E.2d 865

Snippet: under the Uniform Commercial Code — Sales (OCGA§ 11-2-101 et seq.) and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15

Lawrence v. State

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-03-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 225 Ga. App. 606, 484 S.E.2d 341

Snippet: benefit? See, e.g., OCGA §§ 44-12-40 et seq.; 11-2-101 et seq.; 11-7-102 et seq.? (b) If appellant was

Alco Standard Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-12-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 426 S.E.2d 648, 206 Ga. App. 794

Snippet: ;Uniform Commercial Code — Sales," OCGA § 11-2-101 et seq. and particularly OCGA § 11-2-207. However

Embryo Progeny Associates v. Lovana Farms, Inc.

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 416 S.E.2d 833, 203 Ga. App. 447

Snippet: article of the Uniform Commercial Code (OCGA § 11-2-101 et seq.), and that the suit was barred by the

Charles Evans BMW, Inc. v. Williams

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-07-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 395 S.E.2d 650, 196 Ga. App. 230

Snippet: in the instant case. It is provisions of OCGA § 11-2-101 et seq. that are controlling here. OCGA § 11-2

CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT, INC. v. Rountree

Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-11-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 364 S.E.2d 65, 185 Ga. App. 417

Snippet: transaction is thus within the ambit of OCGA § 11-2-101 et seq. However, it is clear that the lease is… of a security interest. [Cits.] Thus, [OCGA § 11-2-101 et seq.] does not apply and the parties'