Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 109A-2 - 510, enacted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1.)
- For article, "Impracticability As Risk Allocation: The Effect of Changed Circumstances upon Contract Obligations for the Sale of Goods," see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 503 (1988).
- Jury properly determined that the defendant did not bear the loss of a helicopter crash because there was some evidence upon which the jury could rely in concluding that the defendant did not breach the agreement between the parties and the jury made a special finding that under the aircraft purchase agreement, the risk of loss remained with the plaintiff despite the defendant's agreement to make additional repairs. Eagle Jets, LLC v. Atlanta Jet, Inc., 321 Ga. App. 386, 740 S.E.2d 439 (2013).
- 67 Am. Jur. 2d, Sales, §§ 413, 428-430.
6 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Commercial Code, § 2:487.
- 77A C.J.S., Sales, § 214.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 2-510.
- Applicability of provision in contract of sale for return of article, where article delivered does not answer to description, 30 A.L.R. 321.
Provisions of sales contract relating to party to bear the loss from insolvency of or breach of contract by bank through which paper representing price is routed for collection, 99 A.L.R. 1472.
Upon whom loss from theft or the like falls, where seller turns over goods at buyer's premises, 50 A.L.R.2d 330.
Who bears risk of loss of goods under UCC § 2-509 and § 2-510, 66 A.L.R.3d 145.
No results found for Georgia Code 11-2-510.