Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §11-3-118, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 1306, § 3.)
- For article on the 1963 amendment to the Georgia Uniform Commercial Code, see 14 Mercer L. Rev. 378 (1963). For note, "Negotiable Promissory Notes Containing Time and Demand Provisions: The Need for Consistent Interpretation," see 19 Ga. L. Rev. 717 (1984).
- In light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Code Section 11-3-122 are included in the annotations for this section.
- O.C.G.A. § 11-3-118 did not apply retroactively to extend the limitation period in an action on a demand note brought before the current provision went into effect. Johnson v. Hodge, 223 Ga. App. 227, 477 S.E.2d 385 (1996).
Where an action on demand notes was barred under former § 11-3-122(1)(b), O.C.G.A. § 11-3-118 did not apply retroactively to revive the previously time-barred claim. McNeal Constr. Co. v. Wilson, 271 Ga. 540, 522 S.E.2d 222 (1999), reversing McNeal Constr. Co. v. Wilson, 235 Ga. App. 759, 509 S.E.2d 742 (1998).
- One may bring action upon debt evidenced by commercial paper by suing directly on instrument which imports its own consideration without setting forth facts creating obligation evidenced by the paper. Minner v. Childs, 116 Ga. App. 272, 157 S.E.2d 50 (1967) (decided under former Code Section11-3-122).
- Bank account holder's conversion and negligence action against a bank for paying two checks on the holder's account without authorization was barred by the Georgia Uniform Commercial Code's three-year statute of limitations set forth in O.C.G.A. § 11-3-118(g), which applied to negotiable instruments, because the holder did not file a complaint until more than three years after the bank paid the checks at issue. Ogundele v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., F. Supp. 2d (N.D. Ga. Dec. 6, 2004).
- Six-year period for bringing actions on unsealed demand instrument commences upon date of instrument or, if no date is stated, on date instrument was issued. Woodall v. Hixon, 154 Ga. App. 844, 270 S.E.2d 65, rev'd on other grounds, 246 Ga. 758, 272 S.E.2d 727 (1980) (decided under former Code Section11-3-122).
Cited in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hale Haven Props., 346 Ga. App. 39, 815 S.E.2d 574 (2018).
- 11 Am. Jur. 2d, Banks and Financial Institutions, § 927. 11 Am. Jur. 2d, Bills and Notes, § 190. 12 Am. Jur. 2d, Bills and Notes, § 632 et seq. 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Interest and Usury, § 51.
- 10 C.J.S., Bills and Notes, §§ 86 et seq., 257. 47 C.J.S., Interest and Usury, §§ 42-53.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 3-118.
- Who must bear loss of funds from failure of bank, at which bill or note is payable, during delay in presenting it, 2 A.L.R. 1381.
Time at which interest is payable under will or contract providing for payment of interest, 10 A.L.R. 997.
Right of holder to sue bank in respect of deposit made, for payment of existing obligation other than check, 50 A.L.R. 1012.
Time when statute of limitation commences to run in favor of endorser of paper upon which prior endorsement was forged, 117 A.L.R. 1164.
Statute of limitations: action by one secondarily liable on negotiable instrument against others secondarily liable, or against principal, as an action on such instrument, or an action on an implied promise, or a similar action, 143 A.L.R. 1062.
Application of "bad check" statute with respect to postdated checks, 52 A.L.R.3d 464.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-10-18
Citation: 522 S.E.2d 222, 271 Ga. 540, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 3776, 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 755, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 783
Snippet: the same became due and payable. However, OCGA § 11-3-118 was amended, effective July 1, 1996, to provide