O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
In an action for breach of an obligation for which a third person is answerable over pursuant to this article or Article 4 of this title, the defendant may give the third person written notice of the litigation, and
the person notified may then give similar notice to any other person who is answerable over. If the notice states that (i) the person notified may come in and defend; and (ii) failure to do so will bind the person notified in an action later brought by the person giving the notice as to any determination of fact common to the two litigations, the person notified is so bound unless after seasonable receipt of the notice the person notified does come in and defend.
History
Code 1981, § 11-3-119, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 1306, § 3.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES U.L.A. Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 3119.
PART 2 NEGOTIATION, TRANSFER, AND INDORSEMENT
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1985–1994 · leading case:
Brooks v. McCorkle, 329 S.E.2d 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).
Brooks v. McCorkle, 329 S.E.2d 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 2× “§ 109A-3 — 119 [now OCGA § 11-3-119]. The defendant offered no such written agreements.”
Grace v. Golden, 425 S.E.2d 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “We agree with appellant that under Georgia law, unless otherwise provided by agreement, upon default by a debtor a creditor need not look first to the property securing a note.”
Jaraysi v. Soloway, 451 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 2× “OCGA § 11-3-119 (1). See also Hunter v. McLelland, 143 Ga.”
— 11-3-119(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.