Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §11-5-103, enacted by Ga. L. 2002, p. 995, § 1; Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 3B-16/SB 65.)
The 2015 amendment, effective January 1, 2016, substituted "in Code Section 11-1-302" for "in subsection (3) of Code Section 11-1-102" in the first sentence of subsection (c).
- Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 1-1/SB 65, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "(a) This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Debtor-Creditor Uniform Law Modernization Act of 2015.'
"(b) To promote consistency among the states, it is the intent of the General Assembly to modernize certain existing uniform laws promulgated by the Uniform Law Commission affecting debtor and creditor rights, responsibilities, and relationships and other federally recognized laws affecting such rights, responsibilities, and relationships."
- In light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Article 5 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Former O.C.G.A. § 11-5-102(3) expressly contemplates court-managed expansion of principles contained in former Article 5. Barclays Bank v. Mercantile Nat'l Bank, 481 F.2d 1224 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. dismissed, 414 U.S. 1139, 94 S. Ct. 888, 39 L. Ed. 2d 96, (1974).
- The fact that former O.C.G.A. § 11-5-103(1)(f) provides a definition for a confirming bank with regard to letters of credit issued by a bank does not preclude existence of bank confirmation of a nonbank credit. Barclays Bank D.C.O. v. Mercantile Nat'l Bank, 339 F. Supp. 457 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd, 481 F.2d 1224 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. dismissed, 414 U.S. 1139, 94 S. Ct. 888, 39 L. Ed. 2d 96 (1974).
- The issuing bank's failure to give timely notice of dishonor was not excused by the fact that the beneficiary later admitted it could not have produced the documents in question, no matter how much time it was given. Pro-Fab, Inc. v. Vipa, Inc., 772 F.2d 847 (11th Cir. 1985).
Cited in Bank S. v. Roswell Jeep Eagle, Inc., 204 Ga. App. 432, 419 S.E.2d 522 (1992).
- 11 Am. Jur. 2d, Bills and Notes, § 337 et seq. 50 Am. Jur. 2d, Letters of Credit, and Credit Cards, §§ 19, 72, 73.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 5-103.
- Variance between description of goods in letter of credit and documents accompanying draft as affecting duty to accept draft, 30 A.L.R. 353; 8 A.L.R.5th 463.
Construction of provision for extension in letter of credit or guaranty for purchase price of goods, 45 A.L.R. 1393.
Construction and effect of UCC Art. 5, dealing with letters of credit, 35 A.L.R.3d 1404.
Modification, revocation, or reformation of letter of credit - modern cases, 13 A.L.R.5th 465.
Validity, construction, and application of the uniform customs and practice for documentary credits (UCP), 56 A.L.R.5th 565.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-04-23
Citation: 257 Ga. 94, 355 S.E.2d 421, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 713
Snippet: the princi*97pal and interest owed.1 See OCGA § 11-5-103 (1) (a). Thus, neither the fact that the letter