Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §11-9-303, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1.)
- In the light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Article 9 are included in the annotations for this Code section. For a table of comparable provisions, see the table at the beginning of the Article.
- Where creditor of car owner had perfected security interest in the car, and name of creditor as holder of security interest was shown on existing certificate of title issued by jurisdiction where car was located when security interest attached, creditors security interest perfected in North Carolina continued perfected in Georgia, and was valid against subsequent transferees. United Carolina Bank v. Sistrunk, 158 Ga. App. 107, 279 S.E.2d 272 (1981).
Applying Canadian law to the facts of the case, a remote purchaser could not prevail over a creditor who had perfected its purchase money security interest in a truck within the time specified by Canadian law. Paccar Fin. Servs., Ltd. v. Johnson, 195 Ga. App. 412, 393 S.E.2d 685 (1990).
Cited in Provident Bank v. Morequity, Inc., 262 Ga. App. 331, 585 S.E.2d 625 (2003).
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9-303.
No results found for Georgia Code 11-9-303.