O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 12-8-21 (2019)

Declaration of policy; legislative intent

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It is declared to be the policy of the State of Georgia, in furtherance of its responsibility to protect the public health, safety, and well-being of its citizens and to protect and enhance the quality of its environment, to institute and maintain a comprehensive state-wide program for solid waste management and to prevent and abate litter, so as to assure that solid waste does not adversely affect the health, safety, and well-being of the public and that solid waste facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, do not degrade the quality of the environment by reason of their location, design, method of operation, or other means and which, to the extent feasible and practical, makes maximum utilization of the resources contained in solid waste. (b) It is further declared to be the policy of the State of Georgia to educate and encourage generators and handlers of solid waste to reduce and minimize to the greatest extent possible the amount of solid waste which requires collection, treatment, or disposal through source reduction, reuse, composting, recycling, and other methods and to promote markets for and engage in the purchase of goods made from recovered materials and goods which are recyclable. (c) It is the intent of the General Assembly that every effort be undertaken to reduce on a state-wide per capita basis the amount of municipal solid waste being received at disposal facilities. (d) It is further the intent of the General Assembly that the director of the Environmental Protection Division of the Department of Natural Resources shall be the official charged with primary responsibility for the solid waste management program. The director, in exercising any authority granted in this part, shall conform to and implement the

policies outlined in this part and shall at all times coordinate his activities with those of other state agencies and local political jurisdictions so as to achieve a unified and effective solid waste management program in the state. (e) It is further intended by the General Assembly that the director of the Environmental Protection Division of the Department of Natural Resources shall, in exercising any authority granted in this part, recognize that the states which share common borders with Georgia also share the vital natural resources of clean air, clean surface waters, and clean ground waters which flow across those common borders and that, therefore, those bordering states have a mutual interest with Georgia to manage solid waste in a manner that does not threaten to contaminate the shared natural resources. The director shall also recognize, however, that such mutual interest may not exist between Georgia and states which do not share common borders and natural resources with it. Therefore, the director is instructed to be particularly mindful of the need to monitor, inspect, and regulate closely that solid waste generated from sources located in states not sharing common borders and natural resources with Georgia. (f ) It is further the intent of the General Assembly that every effort be undertaken to ensure the proper management of scrap tires from the point of generation to the ultimate point of reuse, recycling, or disposal and that every effort be made to ensure that, where possible, they be reused or recycled rather than being disposed. (g) It is further the intent of the General Assembly to provide a frame of reference for this state and all counties, municipal corporations, and solid waste management authorities in this state relating to the handling of yard trimmings. It is also the intent of the General Assembly to encourage beneficial reuse of yard trimmings and other vegetative matter by composting and other methods of recycling and return of such vegetative matter to the soil and by reuse of yard trimmings to promote bioenergy and renewable energy goals. The General Assembly, therefore, adopts and recommends the following hierarchy for handling yard trimmings: (1) Naturalized, low-maintenance landscaping requiring little or no cutting; (2) Grass cycling by mowing it high and letting it lie; (3) Return to the soil or other beneficial reuse on the site where the material was grown, including but not limited to: (A) Stacking branches into brush piles for use as wildlife habitats and for gradual decomposition into the soil;

CONSERVATION & NATURAL RES.

(B) Composting on the site where the material was grown, followed by incorporation of the finished compost into the soil at that site; or (C) Chipping woody material on the site where such material was generated; and (4) Collecting yard trimmings and transporting them to another site to be: (A) Processed for mulch or feedstock for composting; (B) Processed for use as a bioenergy feedstock; or (C) Disposed in a lined landfill having a permitted gas collection system in operation by which landfill gas is directed to equipment or facilities for beneficial reuse such as electrical power generation, industrial end use, or other beneficial use promoting renewable energy goals.

History

Code 1981, § 12-8-21, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 412, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 3259, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 399, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 2005, p. 1247, §§ 1, 2/SB 122; Ga. L. 2011, p. 283, § 1/HB 274.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article on the

2011 amendment of this Code section, see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 165 (2011). For article, ‘‘Conservation and Natural Resources: Waste Management,’’ see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 165 (2011).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Ordinance restricting waste disposal services upheld. - Georgia trial court erred by denying injunctive relief to a county and the county’s chosen waste disposal company wherein it sought to prohibit an unauthorized waste company from providing services in the county against an ordinance because the ordinance served a legitimate public purpose by establishing means reasonably necessary to achieve the purpose of the county providing a comprehensive solid waste management plan as the county was re-

quired to do under O.C.G.A. § 12-8-31.1. Advanced Disposal Servs. Middle Ga., LLC v. Deep S. Sanitation, LLC, 296 Ga. 103, 765 S.E.2d 364 (2014). Termination of garbage collection service for nonpayment of fee. - O.C.G.A. § 12-8-21(a) was not violated by provisions in a county ordinance authorizing the termination of a resident’s garbage collection service for nonpayment of the collection fee. Strykr v. Long County Bd. of Comm’rs, 277 Ga. 624, 593 S.E.2d 348 (2004).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Essential intent of subsection (c) of O.C.G.A. § 12-8-21 is the reduction of solid waste by 25 percent. This goal remains effective in applying related requirements of the Georgia Comprehensive

Solid Waste Management Act, O.C.G.A. § 12-8-20 et seq., notwithstanding that the goal was originally expressed in terms of a calendar date which has passed. 1997 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 97-23.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 25 Am. Jur. 2d, Drains and Drainage Districts, § 3. 61C Am. Jur. 2d, Pollution Control, §§ 633, 961 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Butts Cnty. v. Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc., 445 S.E.2d 294 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).
Butts Cnty. v. Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc., 445 S.E.2d 294 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 10× “In making this argument, Butts County relies on OCGA §§ 12-8-21 (c) and 12-8-39.1, which require that the solid waste management plan of each city or county contain a program to reduce the amount of municipal solid waste being received at its disposal facilities by 25 percent.”
Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Bd. of Nat. Resources, 466 S.E.2d 197 (Ga. 1996). · cites it 4× “[12] OCGA § 12-8-21 (1992); see Solid Waste Management, 7 Ga.”
Murray Cnty. v. R & J MURRAY, LLC, 627 S.E.2d 574 (Ga. 2006). · cites it 4× “OCGA§ 12-8-21 (a). OCGA § 12-8-31.1. OCGA§ 12-8-24 (g).”
Grove v. Sugar Hill Inv. Assocs., Inc., 466 S.E.2d 901 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “This does not conform to the legislature’s purpose in enacting the Solid Waste Management Act, OCGA § 12-8-21 (a). 2. It is undisputed that the City failed to provide the statutory notice of the meeting in which the city council adopted the agreement at issue, as required under…”
Strykr v. Long Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 593 S.E.2d 348 (Ga. 2004). · cites it 2× “We do not agree with Strykr that OCGA § 12-8-21 (a) (policy of protecting public health furthered by comprehensive solid waste management program) is violated by provisions in the ordinance authorizing the termination of a resident’s collection service for nonpayment of the…”
R & J MURRAY, LLC v. Murray Cnty., 653 S.E.2d 720 (Ga. 2007). · cites it 4× “” OCGA § 12-8-21 (a). The comprehensive state-wide program, in turn, has three stated purposes of its own: (1) to assure that all solid waste does not “adversely affect the health, safety, and well-being of the public”; (2) to assure solid waste facilities do not denigrate the…”
City of Arcade v. Emmons, 494 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “” OCGA § 12-8-21 (a). Under the Act, the director of the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources is charged with primary responsibility for implementing the policies of the Act.”
Perry v. Soil Remediation, Inc., 471 S.E.2d 320 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 12-8-21 (a). Assuming Soil Remediation shipped waste by Mitchell, Mitchell was himself required to obtain a permit from the State and comply with the Act and its rules and regulations.”
Env't Waste Reductions, Inc. v. Reheis, 887 F. Supp. 1534 (N.D. Ga. 1995). · cites it 4× “6 O.C.G.A. § 12-8-21(c). In O.C.G.A. § 12-8-31.”
Advanced Disposal Servs. Middle Georgia, LLC v. Deep South Sanitation, LLC, 765 S.E.2d 364 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 12-8-21 (a) (purpose of the Georgia Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Act is “to protect the public health, safety, and well-being of [Georgia] citizens and to protect and enhance the quality of [Georgia’s] environment”); OCGA § 12-8-31.”
Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc. v. BUTTS Cnty., GA., 864 F. Supp. 1338 (M.D. Ga. 1994). · cites it 2× “Action No. 92-659 (Butts Sup.Ct.) (“Butts II”). 22.”
Satilla Riverwatch All., Inc. v. David Dove, Interim Dir., Env't Prot. Div., Georgia Dept. of Nat. Resources (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “Bearing these principles in mind, we now consider whether the ALJ correctly ruled that EPD wrongfully issued the permit to the Developer because it failed to submit a valid consistency letter.”
— 12-8-21(a) — 2 cases
Murray Cnty. v. R & J MURRAY, LLC, 627 S.E.2d 574 (Ga. 2006). “OCGA§ 12-8-21 (a). OCGA § 12-8-31.1. OCGA§ 12-8-24 (g).”
R & J MURRAY, LLC v. Murray Cnty., 653 S.E.2d 720 (Ga. 2007). “” OCGA § 12-8-21 (a). The comprehensive state-wide program, in turn, has three stated purposes of its own: (1) to assure that all solid waste does not “adversely affect the health, safety, and well-being of the public”; (2) to assure solid waste facilities do not denigrate the…”
— 12-8-21(c) — 1 case
Env't Waste Reductions, Inc. v. Reheis, 887 F. Supp. 1534 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “6 O.C.G.A. § 12-8-21(c). In O.C.G.A. § 12-8-31.”
— 12-8-21(d) — 1 case
Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc. v. Butts Cnty., 886 F. Supp. 851 (M.D. Ga. 1994).
— 12-8-21(e) — 2 cases
Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc. v. BUTTS Cnty., GA., 864 F. Supp. 1338 (M.D. Ga. 1994). “Action No. 92-659 (Butts Sup.Ct.) (“Butts II”). 22.”
Env't Waste Reductions, Inc. v. Reheis, 887 F. Supp. 1534 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “6 O.C.G.A. § 12-8-21(c). In O.C.G.A. § 12-8-31.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.