Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §12-8-30.6, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 412, § 1.)
- 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law, § 20.
- 22 C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 26.
- Trial court properly denied a solid waste facility operator's double jeopardy plea in bar of prosecution because even though the parties stipulated that the consent order and the criminal action alleged the same nuisance conduct and each proceeding had the same goals of restraint, deterrence, and abatement, the criminal action was not barred by the sanctions imposed in the consent order since the consent order did not amount to criminal punishment to which double jeopardy prohibitions applied. Wilbros, LLC v. State, 294 Ga. 514, 755 S.E.2d 145 (2014).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24
Citation: 294 Ga. 514, 755 S.E.2d 145, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 379, 2014 WL 695212, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 117
Snippet: authorized by statute as civil sanctions. See OCGA § 12-8-30.6 (authorizing, among other things, a fine not to