O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 12-8-30.9 (2019)

Powers of local governmental bodies and state not limited by this part

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No provision of this part and no rule, regulation, or ruling of the board or the director shall be construed to be a limitation:

(1) On the power of a municipality, county, authority, or special district to adopt and enforce additional regulations, not in conflict

CONSERVATION & NATURAL RES.

with this part, imposing further conditions, restrictions, or limitations with respect to the handling or disposal of municipal solid waste;

(2) On the power of a municipality, county, authority, or special district to declare, prohibit, and abate nuisances;

(3) On the power of the Attorney General, at the request of the director or upon his own volition, to bring an action in the name of the State of Georgia; or

(4) On the power of any state agency in the enforcement or administration of any provision of law it is specifically permitted or required to enforce or administer.

History

Code 1981, § 12-8-30.9, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 412, § 1.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant

to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1990, a comma was inserted following ‘‘authority’’ near the beginning of paragraph (1).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS County ordinance covering payment of garbage collection fees. - State constitution, statutes, and case law permit a county to enact an ordinance making property owners responsible for the payment of garbage collection fees for the owners’ rental property. Board of Comm’rs v. Guthrie, 273 Ga. 1, 537 S.E.2d 329 (2000). Prior consent order did not amount to criminal punishment to which double jeopardy prohibitions applied. - Trial court properly denied a solid waste

facility operator’s double jeopardy plea in bar of prosecution because even though the parties stipulated that the consent order and the criminal action alleged the same nuisance conduct and each proceeding had the same goals of restraint, deterrence, and abatement, the criminal action was not barred by the sanctions imposed in the consent order since the consent order did not amount to criminal punishment to which double jeopardy prohibitions applied. Wilbros, LLC v. State, 294 Ga. 514, 755 S.E.2d 145 (2014).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under Ga. L. 1972, pp. 1002 and 1006 are included in the annotations for this Code section. ‘‘County’’ construed. - Reference to

‘‘county’’ should be construed broadly enough to cover other county governmental bodies. 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 76-17 (decided under Ga. L. 1972, pp. 1002 and 1006).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2014 · leading case: Bd. of Com'rs of Atkinson Cnty. v. Guthrie, 537 S.E.2d 329 (Ga. 2000).
Bd. of Com'rs of Atkinson Cnty. v. Guthrie, 537 S.E.2d 329 (Ga. 2000). · cites it 4× “[5] OCGA §§ 12-8-30.9; 12-8-22 (1996). [6] See OCGA § 12-8-39.”
Env't Waste Reductions, Inc. v. Legal Env't Assistance Found., Inc., 455 S.E.2d 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 12-8-30.9 (1). We do not believe that Bibb’s requirement that those seeking to import waste first receive a permit conflicts with the Act.”
Wilbros, LLC v. State, 755 S.E.2d 145 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 12-8-30.9 states that no provision of the Act shall be construed to be a limitation: (1) On the power of a municipality, county, authority, or special district to adopt and enforce additional regulations, not in conflict with this part, imposing further conditions,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.