Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Georgia Prompt Pay Act."
(Code 1981, §13-11-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1398, § 1.)
- For annual survey of construction law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 109 (2004). For annual survey on admiralty, see 62 Mercer L. Rev. 1053 (2011).
- Trial court did not err by granting summary judgment to the Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) as to the sureties' claims for breach of contract and violation of the Georgia Prompt Payment Act, O.C.G.A. § 13-11-1 et seq., because there was no issue of material fact as to whether a contractor's and the sureties' failure to comply with the claim notice provisions of the contract were waived by the DOT. Western Sur. Co. v. DOT, 326 Ga. App. 671, 757 S.E.2d 272 (2014).
Cited in Pipe Solutions, Inc. v. Inglis, 291 Ga. App. 328, 661 S.E.2d 683 (2008); Christie v. Rainmaster Irrigation, Inc., 299 Ga. App. 383, 682 S.E.2d 687 (2009).
Total Results: 10
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-03-15
Snippet: claims of misappropriation of a trade secret); 13-1- 11 (allowing “obligations to pay attorney’s fees
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-05-20
Citation: 293 Ga. 42, 743 S.E.2d 399, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1542, 2013 WL 2150844, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 450
Snippet: further provided notice that, pursuant to OCGA § 13-1-11, Borrower had ten days from receipt of the notice
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-02-11
Citation: 657 S.E.2d 239, 283 Ga. 134, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 412, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 134
Snippet: expenses and attorney fees as provided in OCGA § 13-1-11,[3] and OCGA § 13-6-11.[4] The case went to trial
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-29
Citation: 653 S.E.2d 680, 282 Ga. 841, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3253, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 788
Snippet: explain the basis for its conclusion that OCGA § 13-1-11 (a) (2) did not limit attorney’s fees to 15% of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-11-30
Citation: 638 S.E.2d 307, 281 Ga. 342, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3705, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 1030
Snippet: required to recover attorney’s fees under OCGA § 13-1-11 can be given in either the original complaint or
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-01-30
Citation: 626 S.E.2d 92, 280 Ga. 166, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 294, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 78
Snippet: compliance with then Code Ann. § 20-506(c) (now OCGA § 13-1-11(a)(3)), which provided as follows: The holder of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-11-10
Citation: 588 S.E.2d 745, 277 Ga. 342, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 3291, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 945
Snippet: claim for attorney fees brought pursuant to OCGA § 13-1-11, despite undisputed compliance with the requirements
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-09-09
Citation: 475 S.E.2d 616, 267 Ga. 85, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2459, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 478
Snippet: failed to send the notice required under O.C.G.A. § 13-1-11. The evidence at trial showed that Norma's husband
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-01-28
Citation: 352 S.E.2d 373, 256 Ga. 642, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 577
Snippet: recovered because of noncompliance with OCGA § 13-1-11 and by res judicata. 1. Kauka Farms insists that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-04-17
Citation: 252 Ga. 452, 314 S.E.2d 656, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 721
Snippet: by Krapf was not notice as required by OCGA § 13-1-11 (Code Ann. § 20-506). In our view the statute’s