O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603 (2019)

Judicial and administrative dissolution; reservation of name

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) On application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the articles of organization or a written operating agreement. A certified copy of any such decree shall be delivered to the Secretary of State, who shall file it.

(b) (1) The Secretary of State may commence a proceeding under this subsection to dissolve a limited liability company administratively if:

(A) The limited liability company does not deliver its annual registration to the Secretary of State, together with all required fees and penalties, within 60 days after it is due;

(B) The limited liability company is without a registered agent or registered office in this state for 60 days or more;

(C) The limited liability company does not notify the Secretary of State within 60 days that its registered agent or registered office has been changed, that its registered agent has resigned, or that its registered office has been discontinued; or

(D) The limited liability company pays a fee as required to be collected by the Secretary of State by a check or some other form of payment which is dishonored and the limited liability company or its agent does not submit payment for said dishonored payment within 60 days from notice of nonpayment issued by the Secretary of State.

(2) If the Secretary of State determines that one or more grounds exist under this subsection for dissolving a limited liability company, he or she shall provide the limited liability company with written notice of his or her determination by mailing a copy of the notice, first-class mail, to the limited liability company at the last known address of its principal office or to the registered agent. If the limited liability company does not correct each ground for dissolution or demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Secretary of State that each ground determined by the Secretary of State does not exist within 60 days after notice is provided to the limited liability company, the Secretary of State shall administratively dissolve the limited liability company by signing a certificate of dissolution that recites the ground or grounds for dissolution and its effective date. The Secretary of State shall file the original of the certificate.

(3) A limited liability company administratively dissolved continues its existence but may not carry on any business except that necessary to wind up and liquidate its business and affairs. Winding up the business of a limited liability company administratively dissolved may include, without limitation, the limited liability company proceeding, at any time after the effective date of the administrative dissolution, in accordance with Code Sections 14-11-607 and 14-11-608. The administrative dissolution of a limited liability company does not terminate the authority of its registered agent.

(4) A limited liability company administratively dissolved under this Code section may apply to the Secretary of State for reinstatement within five years after the effective date of such dissolution. The application shall:

(A) Recite the name of the limited liability company and the effective date of its administrative dissolution;

(B) State that the ground or grounds for dissolution either did not exist or have been eliminated;

(C) Either be executed by the registered agent or a member or manager of the limited liability company, in each case as set forth in the most recent annual registration of the limited liability company filed with the Secretary of State, or be accompanied by a notarized statement, executed by a person who was a member or manager, or an heir, successor, or assign of a person who was a member or manager, of the limited liability company at the time that the limited liability company was administratively dissolved, stating that such person or decedent was a member or manager of the limited liability company at the time of administrative dissolution and such person has knowledge of and assents to the application for reinstatement;

(D) Contain a statement by the limited liability company reciting that all taxes owed by the limited liability company have been paid; and

(E) Be accompanied by the fee required for the application for reinstatement contained in Code Section 14-11-1101. If the Secretary of State determines that the application contains the information required by this paragraph and that the information is correct, he or she shall prepare a certificate of reinstatement that recites his or her determination and the effective date of reinstatement, file the original of the certificate, and serve a copy on the limited liability company. When the reinstatement is effective, it relates back to and takes effect as of the effective date of the administrative dissolution, and the limited liability company resumes carrying on its business as if the administrative dissolution had never occurred.

(5) If the Secretary of State denies a limited liability company's application for reinstatement following administrative dissolution, he or she shall serve the limited liability company with a written notice that explains the reason or reasons for denial. The limited liability company may appeal the denial of reinstatement to the superior court of the county where the limited liability company's registered office is or was located within 30 days after service of the notice of denial is perfected. The limited liability company appeals by petitioning the court to set aside the dissolution and attaching to the petition copies of the Secretary of State's certificate of dissolution, the limited liability company's application for reinstatement, and the Secretary of State's notice of denial. The court's final decision may be appealed as in other civil proceedings.

(6) The Secretary of State shall reserve the name of a limited liability company administratively dissolved under Code Section 14-2-1421 for such limited liability company's specific use for a period of five years after the effective date of the dissolution or until the limited liability company is reinstated, whichever is sooner.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-11-603, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 123, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 405, § 34; Ga. L. 2008, p. 253, §§ 12, 13/SB 436; Ga. L. 2011, p. 430, § 7/SB 64.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For survey article on business associations, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 35 (2008). For article, "2008 Annual Review of Case Law Development," see 14 (No. 6) Ga. St. B. J. 28 (2009). For article, "Business Associations," see 63 Mercer L. Rev. 83 (2011).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Dissolution proper. - Given that parties agreed that a limited liability company should be dissolved, it was proper for trial court to conclude that it was not reasonably practicable to carry on the business under O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603 and to dissolve the company. Ervin v. Turner, 291 Ga. App. 719, 662 S.E.2d 721 (2008), cert. denied, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 773, 774, 794 (Ga. 2008).

Receiver appointed. - After proceedings for dissolution of a limited liability company (LLC) were brought under O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603, the trial court properly appointed a neutral receiver to manage the affairs of the LLC during the pendency of further proceedings. The parties, who each owned half shares in the LLC, could not agree about the management of the LLC and its financial affairs, and even when accountants were hired to conduct an audit of the LLC, a meaningful accounting could not be done because the parties provided conflicting, incomplete, and inconsistent information to the accountants. Ga. Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 283 Ga. 335, 658 S.E.2d 737 (2008).

Arbitration. - The dissolution of a limited liability company (LLC) did not have to be submitted to arbitration under the LLC's operating agreement. None of the events named in the agreement formed the basis for the dissolution; rather, the dissolution proceedings were commenced by one of the LLC's two co-owners under O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. Ga. Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 283 Ga. 335, 658 S.E.2d 737 (2008).

Request by two of a limited liability company's three members for judicial dissolution of the company pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603 was not a claim arising out of, in connection with, or relating to the operating agreement or any breach thereof and therefore was not required to be arbitrated under the agreement. The third member's failure to call or attend meetings as provided in the operating agreement was more than a formality and the trial court did not err in dissolving the company. Simmons Family Props., LLLP v. Shelton, 307 Ga. App. 361, 705 S.E.2d 258 (2010).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR. - Construction and application of limited liability company acts - issues relating to dissolution and winding up of affairs of limited liability company, 49 A.L.R.6th 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Georgia Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 658 S.E.2d 737 (Ga. 2008).
Georgia Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 658 S.E.2d 737 (Ga. 2008). · cites it 36× “When CRS ran into financial trouble, Newnan unilaterally requested that the Superior Court of Coweta County judicially dissolve CRS pursuant to OCGA § 14-11-603. GRC moved to compel arbitration on the issue of CRS's dissolution.”
Simmons Fam. Props., LLLP v. Shelton, 705 S.E.2d 258 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 16× “This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment, after a bench trial, granting a petition to dissolve a limited liability company pursuant to OCGA § 14-11-603 (a) and denying the respondent’s motion to stay the proceeding and compel arbitration.”
Moses v. Pennebaker, 719 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “In April 2002, Pennebaker filed a petition for judicial dissolution and interlocutory injunction, citing OCGA § 14-11-603. 1 In the petition, which named Moses as a defendant and IMG as a nominal defendant, Pennebaker alleged that he and Moses were unable to agree on any…”
Ervin v. Turner, 662 S.E.2d 721 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “The trial court then directed that the LLC be dissolved in accordance with OCGA § 14-11-603. This statute provides, in applicable part, that "[o]n application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably…”
Harris v. Albany Lime & Cement Co., 662 S.E.2d 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “9 Even though the operating agreement provided for dissolution under certain circumstances, one party sought to avoid arbitrating the company’s dissolution where such dissolution was commenced under OCGA § 14-11-603, “which provides an independent legal mechanism for the…”
Gordon v. Kuzara, 2010 MT 275, 245 P.3d 37. · cites it 3× “Rather, th dissolution proceedings were commenced by Newman pursuan to OCGA § 14-11-603, which provides an independent legal] mechanism for judicial and administrative dissolution of alimitei liability company.”
Fox v. Bulkley, No. 3:24-cv-00031 (M.D. Ga. May 17, 2024). · cites it 14× “1-1]; O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. Georgia’s judicial dissolution statute provides that “[o]n application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the…”
Fox v. Bulkley, No. 3:24-cv-00031 (M.D. Ga. May 17, 2024). · cites it 14× “1-1]; O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. Georgia’s judicial-dissolution statute provides that “[o]n application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the…”
Randall E Kimball, No. 24-11036 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2025). · cites it 12× “O.C.G.A § 14-11-603(b)(1). 6 because, in cases where reinstatement occurs, the limited liability company is treated “as if the administrative dissolution has never occurred.”
Remodelers Warehouse, No. 25-10257 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Dec. 31, 2025). · cites it 2× “section 14-11-603(b)(3) provides “[w]inding up the business of a limited liability company administratively dissolved may include, without limitation, the limited liability company proceeding, at any time after the effective date of the administrative dissolution, in accordance…”
Mathew David Ellerbee v. Tommy Dotson, 928 S.E.2d 250 (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “OCGA §§ 14-11-603(b)(3), 14-11-605(a). Although the superior court made a conclusory finding that Matthew Ellerbee did not take the proper steps to engage in this winding-up, the parties have not addressed the legal requirements for winding-up in their appellate briefs and we…”
Hughes v. JBS Ventures, LLC, 2026 NCBC 9 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2× “56 Plaintiff seeks judicial dissolution of JBS under Georgia law, specifically O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. 43. Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s third claim, contending that Plaintiff is not a member of JBS and therefore lacks standing to seek judicial dissolution of JBS.”
14-11-603(a): 6 cases
Georgia Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 658 S.E.2d 737 (Ga. 2008). “When CRS ran into financial trouble, Newnan unilaterally requested that the Superior Court of Coweta County judicially dissolve CRS pursuant to OCGA § 14-11-603. GRC moved to compel arbitration on the issue of CRS's dissolution.”
Ervin v. Turner, 662 S.E.2d 721 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). “The trial court then directed that the LLC be dissolved in accordance with OCGA § 14-11-603. This statute provides, in applicable part, that "[o]n application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably…”
Fox v. Bulkley, No. 3:24-cv-00031 (M.D. Ga. May 17, 2024). “1-1]; O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. Georgia’s judicial dissolution statute provides that “[o]n application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the…”
Fox v. Bulkley, No. 3:24-cv-00031 (M.D. Ga. May 17, 2024). “1-1]; O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. Georgia’s judicial-dissolution statute provides that “[o]n application by or for a member, the court may decree dissolution of a limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the…”
Hughes v. JBS Ventures, LLC, 2026 NCBC 9 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2026). “56 Plaintiff seeks judicial dissolution of JBS under Georgia law, specifically O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. 43. Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s third claim, contending that Plaintiff is not a member of JBS and therefore lacks standing to seek judicial dissolution of JBS.”
14-11-603(b)(1): 1 case
Randall E Kimball, No. 24-11036 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2025). “O.C.G.A § 14-11-603(b)(1). 6 because, in cases where reinstatement occurs, the limited liability company is treated “as if the administrative dissolution has never occurred.”
14-11-603(b)(2): 1 case
Randall E Kimball, No. 24-11036 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2025). “O.C.G.A § 14-11-603(b)(1). 6 because, in cases where reinstatement occurs, the limited liability company is treated “as if the administrative dissolution has never occurred.”
14-11-603(b)(3): 3 cases
Randall E Kimball, No. 24-11036 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2025). “O.C.G.A § 14-11-603(b)(1). 6 because, in cases where reinstatement occurs, the limited liability company is treated “as if the administrative dissolution has never occurred.”
Remodelers Warehouse, No. 25-10257 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Dec. 31, 2025). “section 14-11-603(b)(3) provides “[w]inding up the business of a limited liability company administratively dissolved may include, without limitation, the limited liability company proceeding, at any time after the effective date of the administrative dissolution, in accordance…”
Mathew David Ellerbee v. Tommy Dotson, 928 S.E.2d 250 (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). “OCGA §§ 14-11-603(b)(3), 14-11-605(a). Although the superior court made a conclusory finding that Matthew Ellerbee did not take the proper steps to engage in this winding-up, the parties have not addressed the legal requirements for winding-up in their appellate briefs and we…”
14-11-603(b)(4): 1 case
Randall E Kimball, No. 24-11036 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2025). “O.C.G.A § 14-11-603(b)(1). 6 because, in cases where reinstatement occurs, the limited liability company is treated “as if the administrative dissolution has never occurred.”
14-11-603(b)(6): 1 case
Randall E Kimball, No. 24-11036 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2025). “O.C.G.A § 14-11-603(b)(1). 6 because, in cases where reinstatement occurs, the limited liability company is treated “as if the administrative dissolution has never occurred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.