Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448If the Secretary of State determines that the application contains the information required by this paragraph and that the information is correct, he or she shall prepare a certificate of reinstatement that recites his or her determination and the effective date of reinstatement, file the original of the certificate, and serve a copy on the limited liability company. When the reinstatement is effective, it relates back to and takes effect as of the effective date of the administrative dissolution, and the limited liability company resumes carrying on its business as if the administrative dissolution had never occurred.
(Code 1981, §14-11-603, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 123, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 405, § 34; Ga. L. 2008, p. 253, §§ 12, 13/SB 436; Ga. L. 2011, p. 430, § 7/SB 64.)
- For survey article on business associations, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 35 (2008). For article, "2008 Annual Review of Case Law Development," see 14 (No. 6) Ga. St. B. J. 28 (2009). For article, "Business Associations," see 63 Mercer L. Rev. 83 (2011).
- Given that parties agreed that a limited liability company should be dissolved, it was proper for trial court to conclude that it was not reasonably practicable to carry on the business under O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603 and to dissolve the company. Ervin v. Turner, 291 Ga. App. 719, 662 S.E.2d 721 (2008), cert. denied, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 773, 774, 794 (Ga. 2008).
- After proceedings for dissolution of a limited liability company (LLC) were brought under O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603, the trial court properly appointed a neutral receiver to manage the affairs of the LLC during the pendency of further proceedings. The parties, who each owned half shares in the LLC, could not agree about the management of the LLC and its financial affairs, and even when accountants were hired to conduct an audit of the LLC, a meaningful accounting could not be done because the parties provided conflicting, incomplete, and inconsistent information to the accountants. Ga. Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 283 Ga. 335, 658 S.E.2d 737 (2008).
- The dissolution of a limited liability company (LLC) did not have to be submitted to arbitration under the LLC's operating agreement. None of the events named in the agreement formed the basis for the dissolution; rather, the dissolution proceedings were commenced by one of the LLC's two co-owners under O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603. Ga. Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. Newnan Hosp., 283 Ga. 335, 658 S.E.2d 737 (2008).
Request by two of a limited liability company's three members for judicial dissolution of the company pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 14-11-603 was not a claim arising out of, in connection with, or relating to the operating agreement or any breach thereof and therefore was not required to be arbitrated under the agreement. The third member's failure to call or attend meetings as provided in the operating agreement was more than a formality and the trial court did not err in dissolving the company. Simmons Family Props., LLLP v. Shelton, 307 Ga. App. 361, 705 S.E.2d 258 (2010).
- Construction and application of limited liability company acts - issues relating to dissolution and winding up of affairs of limited liability company, 49 A.L.R.6th 1.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-03-17
Citation: 658 S.E.2d 737, 283 Ga. 335, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 865, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 256
Snippet: majority agrees, that because Newnan invoked OCGA § 14-11-603 (a) as a basis for dissolution, its dispute with