Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §14-2-1408, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 946, § 63; Ga. L. 1990, p. 257, § 23; Ga. L. 2001, p. 796, § 1; Ga. L. 2010, p. 863, § 2/SB 296.)
Source: Former §§ 14-2-4(e),14-2-281,14-2-282(g),14-2-292 and14-2-293.
This section contemplates the filing of articles of dissolution at the completion of the winding up process. It follows the general pattern of Sections 92, 93b and 105 of the Model Act 2d (1969).
Subsection (a) provides that before articles of dissolution can be filed all known debts must have been paid or provided for, or discharged. Subsection (a) also specifies the contents of articles of dissolution, and is based on former § 14-2-281. It requires affirmation that the conditions precedent, discussed above, have been complied with, and adequate provision made for known claims.
Subsection (b) is drawn from former § 14-2-282(g) and former § 14-2-293, which were based on former Model Act 2d §§ 93 and 105. The purpose of this section is to indicate that while corporate existence is deemed to end for most purposes at the time of filing of articles of dissolution, its existence continues for purposes of legal actions. Thus the corporation can continue to sue and be sued in its corporate name, and to defend claims against it. As noted in the Comment to Section14-2-1405, Article 14 dissolution proceedings do not have any of the characteristics of common law dissolution, which treated corporate dissolution as analogous to the death of a natural person and abated lawsuits, vested equitable title to corporate property in the shareholders, imposed the fiduciary duty of trustees on directors who had custody of corporate assets, and revoked the authority of the registered agent. This implements the statutory scheme of Sections14-2-1406 and14-2-1407, which contemplate the possibility of post-dissolution claims being brought against the corporation.
Subsection (c) preserves former § 14-2-4(e), and specifies the officials who have the power to convey property for dissolved corporations, a matter frequently not specified by the corporation itself.
Note to 1989 Amendment The 1989 amendment changed subsection (b) to add the phrase, "which may be brought against the corporation by service upon any of its last executive officers named in its last annual registration," after the reference to "actions or other proceedings." This was to clarify that even after the corporation lacks a registered agent, the executive officers of the corporation can be served with process for the corporation.
Note to 1990 Amendment The 1990 amendment deleted a requirement that the articles of dissolution set forth a statement that a notice to creditors has been published in accordance with § 14-2-1407. Such a requirement is inconsistent with the optional nature of the notice to claimants procedures specified by § 14-2-1407.
Cross-References Articles of dissolution filed by incorporators or initial directors, see § 14-2-1401. Claims against dissolved corporation, see §§ 14-2-1406 &14-2-1407. Effect of notice of intent to dissolve, see § 14-2-1405. Filing fees, see § 14-2-122. Filing requirements, see § 14-2-120. Notice of intent to dissolve, see § 14-2-1403.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, a decision under former Code Section 14-2-281, which was repealed by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1, effective July 1, 1989, is included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Because the lender, an entity originally formed under Georgia law, dissolved before the homeowner filed his complaint, he was required to serve process on any of the executive officers named in the lender's last annual registration; the person the homeowner served was not authorized to accept service and the district court did not acquire personal jurisdiction over the lender before the entry of default and that good cause existed to set that default aside. Thomas v. Bank of Am., N.A., 557 Fed. Appx. 873 (11th Cir. 2014)(Unpublished).
Cited in United States v. Bartlett, 633 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir. 1981); Exclusive Properties, Inc. v. Jones, 218 Ga. App. 229, 460 S.E.2d 562 (1995); Flateau v. Reinhardt, Whitley & Wilmot, 220 Ga. App. 188, 469 S.E.2d 222 (1996).
- 19 Am. Jur. 2d, Corporations, § 2454 et seq.
- 19 C.J.S., Corporations, § 920 et seq.
- Power of corporation after expiration or forfeiture of its charter; effects of dissolution, 97 A.L.R. 477.
Dissolution of corporate lessee as affecting lease and rights and liabilities incident thereto, 147 A.L.R. 360.
Dissolved corporation's power to participate in arbitration proceedings, 71 A.L.R.2d 1121.
Similarity of ownership or control as basis for charging corporation acquiring assets of another with liability for former owner's debts, 49 A.L.R.3d 881.
Products liability: liability of successor corporation for injury or damage caused by product issued by predecessor, 66 A.L.R.3d 824.
Availability of and time for bringing action against former director, officer, or stockholder in dissolved corporation for personal injuries incurred after final dissolution, 20 A.L.R.4th 414.
No results found for Georgia Code 14-2-1408.