O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-3-830 (2019)

Standards of conduct for directors

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless a different standard is prescribed by law:

(1) A director shall discharge his or her duties as a director, including his or her duties as a member of a committee:

(A) In a manner the director believes in good faith to be in the best interests of the corporation; and

(B) With the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances;

(2) In discharging his or her duties, a director is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:

(A) One or more officers or employees of the corporation whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;

(B) Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within the person’s professional or expert competence;

(C) A committee of the board of which the director is not a member, as to matters within its jurisdiction, if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence; or

(D) Religious authorities, ministers, priests, rabbis, or other persons whose positions or duties in the corporation the director believes justify reliance and confidence and whom the director believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;

(3) In the instances described in paragraph (2) of this Code section, a director is not entitled to rely if he has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance otherwise permitted by paragraph (2) of this Code section unwarranted;

(4) A director is not liable to the corporation, any member, or any other person for any action taken or not taken as a director if the director acted in compliance with this Code section; and

(5) A director shall not be deemed to be a trustee with respect to the corporation or with respect to any property held or administered by the corporation, including, without limit, property that may be subject to restrictions imposed by the donor or transferor of such property.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-3-830, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 465, § 1.)

Annotations

COMMENT This section is based both on the Model Act and on its Business Code counterpart. Unlike either, however, it contains an introductory proviso intended to acknowledge the existence of other laws that may establish different standards with respect to some activities engaged in by directors, such as investment of corporate funds. Subsection (1) departs from the Model Act and follows the Business Code formulation of standards verbatim. Subsections 2(D) and (5) are taken from the Model Act.

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘What Duty of Care Does a Homeowner Associa-

tion Owe Its Members?,’’ see 22 Ga. St. Bar J. 19 (Dec. 2016).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2023 · leading case: Shorter Coll. v. Baptist Convention of Georgia, 614 S.E.2d 37 (Ga. 2005).
Shorter Coll. v. Baptist Convention of Georgia, 614 S.E.2d 37 (Ga. 2005). · cites it 8× “" [5] See OCGA § 14-3-830; Developments in the Law-Nonprofit Corporations, 105 HARV.”
James Salter v. St. Charles Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “595, 599 (2) ( 706 SE2d 403 ) (2011); see also OCGA § 14-3-830 (c) (presumption of good faith).”
— 14-3-830(1)(A) — 1 case
Shorter Coll. v. Baptist Convention of Georgia, 614 S.E.2d 37 (Ga. 2005). “" [5] See OCGA § 14-3-830; Developments in the Law-Nonprofit Corporations, 105 HARV.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.