Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1912, p. 107, § 1; Ga. L. 1914, p. 96, § 2; Ga. L. 1933, p. 124, § 1; Code 1933, §§ 22-601, 22-602; Code 1933, §§ 22-4304, 22-4305, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 565, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 14.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under Ga. L. 1912, p. 107, Ga. L. 1914, p. 96, and former Code 1933, §§ 22-601 and 22-602, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- A company must be treated as a de facto corporation within the period in which the charter may be renewed when the record shows no facts to the effect that a revival of the corporation may not yet be had. West v. Flynn Realty Co., 53 Ga. App. 594, 186 S.E. 753 (1936) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-601).
A corporation whose charter has expired is not a perfect legal entity so as to be classed as a corporation de jure, but may be considered as a corporation de facto. Huey v. National Bank, 177 Ga. 64, 169 S.E. 491 (1933) (decided under Ga. L. 1912, p. 107; Ga. L. 1914, p. 96).
A corporation is not deprived of all semblance of legality merely by the expiration of its charter; but the charter may under certain conditions be revived at any time within ten years, and if it is so revived all of the property and other rights of such corporation shall continue as corporate assets and all that the corporation may have done in the meantime shall be held as the acts and doings of the original corporation so revived. Huey v. National Bank, 177 Ga. 64, 169 S.E. 491 (1933) (decided under Ga. L. 1912, p. 107; Ga. L. 1914, p. 96).
- 19 Am. Jur. 2d, Corporations, § 2478 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-09-06
Citation: 253 Ga. 257, 320 S.E.2d 530, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 882
Snippet: General Assembly. E.g., OCGA §§ 14-4-40, 14-4-80, 14-4-81, 14-4-100, 14-4-120. “[T]he new [1968] corporation