Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The majority of those who adhere to its organization and doctrines represent a church. The withdrawal by one part of a congregation from the original body or the uniting of a part of a congregation with another church or denomination is a relinquishment of all rights in the church abandoned.
(Civil Code 1895, § 2360; Civil Code 1910, § 2833; Code 1933, § 22-406; Code 1933, § 22-5504, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 565, § 1.)
- The language of this Code section is derived in part from the decision in Bates v. Houston, 66 Ga. 198 (1880).
- For comment on Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Mem. Presbyterian Church, 225 Ga. 259, 167 S.E.2d 658 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1041, 90 S. Ct. 680, 24 L. Ed. 2d 685 (1970), see 6 Ga. St. B. J. 438 (1970).
- In light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, §§ 22-406 and 22-5504, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Former Code 1933, § 22-5504 (see now O.C.G.A. § 14-5-43) properly was to be construed as being applicable only to churches having a congregational form of government. Jones v. Wolf, 244 Ga. 388, 260 S.E.2d 84 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S. Ct. 1031, 62 L. Ed. 2d 763 (1980) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-5504).
O.C.G.A. § 14-5-43 is applicable only to churches having a congregational form of government and, thus, members of a church not categorized as congregational had standing to bring an action alleging a diversion of church property from the purpose for which the church and its assets had been devoted. Crocker v. Stevens, 210 Ga. App. 231, 435 S.E.2d 690 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1053, 114 S. Ct. 1613, 128 L. Ed. 2d 340 (1994).
- Minorities of a church membership cannot act for the church; the majority of the members, in case of disagreement, represents the church. Walker v. Ful-Kalb, Inc., 181 Ga. 563, 183 S.E. 776 (1936) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-406).
Minority of church membership cannot bind the church by contract unless properly authorized to act for it. Walker v. Ful-Kalb, Inc., 181 Ga. 563, 183 S.E. 776 (1936) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-406).
- In a dispute over ownership of a church's property and assets, a trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs, who claimed to be the majority of the church's membership, because the record was insufficient to allow the trial court to determine whether plaintiffs represented a majority of the church. God's Hope Builders, Inc. v. Mount Zion Baptist Church of Oxford, Georgia, Inc., 321 Ga. App. 435, 741 S.E.2d 185 (2013).
Cited in Carden v. LaGrone, 225 Ga. 365, 169 S.E.2d 168 (1969); James v. Gainey, 231 Ga. 543, 203 S.E.2d 163 (1974); Lucas v. Hope, 515 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1975); Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 99 S. Ct. 3020, 61 L. Ed. 2d 775 (1979); First Rebecca Baptist Church, Inc. v. Atlantic Cotton Mills, 263 Ga. 867, 440 S.E.2d 159 (1993); Howard v. Johnson, 264 Ga. App. 660, 592 S.E.2d 93 (2003).
- 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Religious Societies, §§ 20, 29.
- 77 C.J.S., Religious Societies, §§ 26 et seq., 110 et seq.
- Determination by the civil courts of property rights between contending factions of an independent or congregational church, 8 A.L.R. 105; 70 A.L.R. 75.
Change of denominational relations or fundamental doctrines by majority faction of independent or congregational church as ground for award of property to minority, 15 A.L.R.3d 297.
Total Results: 1 | Sort by: Relevance | Newest First