O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-5-9 (2019)

Jurisdiction and service of summons in garnishment proceedings

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court in which is pending an action, attachment, or judgment upon which is sought garnishment against a corporation shall also have jurisdiction of the garnishment proceeding where the corporation has an agent and place of business in the county in which the court is situated. Service of the summons of garnishment upon the agent in charge of the office or business of the corporation in that county shall be sufficient service.

History

(Ga. L. 1884-85, p. 99, § 2; Civil Code 1895, § 1900; Civil Code 1910, § 2259; Code 1933, § 22-1102; Code 1933, § 22-5302, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 565, § 1.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For note discussing problems with venue in Georgia, and proposing statutory revisions to improve the

resolution of venue questions, see 9 Ga. St. B. J. 254 (1972).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Davenport v. Petroleum Delivery Serv. of Ga., Inc., 235 Ga. 116, 218 S.E.2d 848 (1975). RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Conclusiveness, as regards venue, of designation of place of business in incorporation papers, 175 ALR 1092. Who is ‘‘managing agent’’ of domestic

corporation within statute providing for service of summons or process thereon, 71 ALR2d 178.