O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-8-5 (2019)

Governing laws in absence of specific provision in this chapter

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any case not provided for in this chapter, the other provisions of this Code and the rules of common law and equity shall govern.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-8-5, enacted by Ga. L. 1984, p. 1439, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, § 21 et seq.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1992–2001 · leading case: Holmes v. Henderson, 549 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Holmes v. Henderson, 549 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. 2001). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 14-8-5; Williams v. Tritt, 262 Ga.”

Williams v. Tritt, 415 S.E.2d 285 (Ga. 1992). · cites it 2× “Williams and the management company further contend that they are entitled to a jury trial on all issues, including an auditor’s findings on an accounting. They argue that the Uniform Partnership Act creates statutory standards for an accounting and dissolution, concluding that…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.