Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Ga. L. 1952, p. 375, § 25; Code 1981, §14-9-26; Code 1981, §14-9A-26, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1.)
- For article surveying business associations developments in Georgia from mid-1980 through mid-1981 concerning partnerships and corporations, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 19 (1981).
Order of recordation is simply a memorial of action previously taken and ministerial in nature; it can appropriately take place following an interlocutory hearing. Consortium Mgt. Co. v. Mutual Am. Corp., 246 Ga. 346, 271 S.E.2d 488 (1980).
- If partnership agreement expressly empowers the holders of 75 percent interest in partnership to remove a general partner, then when the holders of more than 75 percent of the interest in the partnership vote to remove the general partners, the action is then effective. As no intervention by the court is necessary to accomplish the removal, and the only necessity for involving the court is to record the action already taken, which is the purpose of Ga. L. 1952, p. 375, § 25, the role of the court in this connection is that of carrying out a purely ministerial function, and under these circumstances, no personal service is required on general partner. Consortium Mgt. Co. v. Mutual Am. Corp., 246 Ga. 346, 271 S.E.2d 488 (1980).
- When order directing recording of amended certificate is proper, injunction based on amended certificate is proper. Consortium Mgt. Co. v. Mutual Am. Corp., 246 Ga. 346, 271 S.E.2d 488 (1980).
- 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, § 786 et seq.
- 68 C.J.S., Partnership, §§ 577, 589, 619 et seq., 613.
- Uniform Limited Partnership Act (U.L.A.), § 25.