Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §15-10-45, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 2-1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 15; Ga. L. 1984, p. 1096, § 6; Ga. L. 2008, p. 824, § 3/HB 958; Ga. L. 2013, p. 561, § 4/SB 66.)
The 2013 amendment, effective July 1, 2013, in subsections (a) through (c), substituted "counterclaim" for "claim" throughout; in subsection (a), substituted "counterclaim shall" for "claim must" near the middle and inserted "the" preceding "plaintiff's" near the end; in subsection (c), substituted "counterclaim" for "statement of claim" in the second sentence, substituted "the counterclaim" for "and verify the statement of claim by oath or affirmation" in the third sentence, substituted "counterclaim" for "statement" in the fourth sentence, and added the fifth sentence.
- For article, "The Civil Jurisdiction of State and Magistrate Courts," see 24 Ga. St. B. J. 29 (1987).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions decided under former Code 1873, § 4166 and former Code Section 15-10-99, relating to setoff in actions in justice courts are included in the annotations for this Code section. See Editor's notes at beginning of chapter.
If claim of setoff exceeds jurisdiction of court, defendant cannot write off part of judgment, but may sue in superior court for balance due. Ware v. Fambro, 67 Ga. 515 (1881) (decided under former Code 1873, § 4166).
Damages in tort cannot be set off to contract demand. Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furn. Co., 114 Ga. 921, 41 S.E. 74 (1902) (decided under former law).
Plea of recoupment will be construed as one based on breach of warranty rather than deceit. Bowers v. Williams, 17 Ga. App. 779, 88 S.E. 703 (1916) (decided under former law).
No notice to plaintiff of filing of plea of recoupment is necessary to authorize trial if plaintiff is absent. Bowers v. Williams, 17 Ga. App. 799, 88 S.E. 703 (1916) (decided under former law).
- Civil court properly refused to transfer a dispossessory action from the county civil court to the superior court under O.C.G.A. § 15-10-45(d) based on the tenant filing a counterclaim as that statute only applied to magistrate courts, not the county civil court. Further, whether the trial court erred by failing to inquire as to whether the parties were willing to consent to consolidation of the claims could not be determined because the appealing tenant failed to provide a transcript of the bifurcated or dispossessory hearings. Roberts v. Strong, 293 Ga. App. 466, 667 S.E.2d 632 (2008).
Cited in Oh v. Bell, 221 Ga. App. 276, 470 S.E.2d 807 (1996); Setlock v. Setlock, 286 Ga. 384, 688 S.E.2d 346 (2010).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-01-25
Citation: 286 Ga. 384, 688 S.E.2d 346, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 167, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 66
Snippet: required to raise them in magistrate court. See OCGA 15-10-45 (a) (compulsory counterclaims in magistrate court)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-11-01
Citation: 385 S.E.2d 276, 259 Ga. 617
Snippet: within the statute of limitation. [5] OCGA § 15-10-45 (a) apparently envisions adding parties in the