O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-11-145 (2019)

Preliminary protective hearing requirements

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If an alleged dependent child is removed from his or her home and is not returned home, the preliminary protective hearing shall be held promptly and not later than 72 hours after such child is placed in foster care; provided, however, that if the 72 hour time frame expires on a weekend or legal holiday, the hearing shall be held on the next day which is not a weekend or legal holiday. (b) Reasonable oral or written notice of the preliminary protective hearing, stating the time, place, and purpose of the hearing, shall be given to the child who is a party in such hearing and, if such person can be found, to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (c) If an alleged dependent child’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian has not been notified of the preliminary protective hearing and did not appear or waive appearance at such hearing and thereafter files an affidavit showing such facts, the court shall rehear the matter without unnecessary delay and shall order such child’s release unless it appears from such hearing that such child’s foster care is warranted or required. (d) The following persons shall have the right to participate in the preliminary protective hearing: (1) A child’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian, unless such person cannot be located or fails to appear in response to the notice; (2) A child’s attorney and guardian ad litem if a guardian ad litem has been appointed; (3) A child who was removed from his or her home, unless the court finds, after considering evidence of harm to such child that will result from such child’s presence at the proceeding, that being present is not in such child’s best interests; (4) A parent’s attorney if an attorney has been retained or appointed; (5) The assigned DFCS caseworker; and (6) The attorney for DFCS. (e) The court may allow the following parties to be present at the preliminary protective hearing, if the court finds it is in the best interests of the child: (1) Any relative or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to a child with whom a child might be placed;

(2) DFCS employees involved in the case; (3) An advocate as requested by an alleged dependent child’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian; and (4) Other persons who have knowledge of or an interest in the welfare of the child who is alleged to be dependent. (f ) At the commencement of a preliminary protective hearing, the court shall inform the parties of: (1) The contents of the complaint in terms understandable to the parties; (2) The nature of the proceedings in terms understandable to the parties; and (3) The parties’ due process rights, including the parties’ right to an attorney and to an appointed attorney if they are indigent persons, the right to call witnesses and to cross-examine all witnesses, the right to present evidence, and the right to a trial by the court on the allegations in the complaint or petition. (g) If a child is not released at the preliminary protective hearing, a petition for dependency shall be made and presented to the court within five days of such hearing.

History

Code 1981, § 15-11-145, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 24A-1404, which were subsequently repealed but were succeeded by provisions in this article, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor’s note at the beginning of the chapter. Notice and hearing requirements were mandatory and must be adhered to in order for the juvenile court to proceed with the adjudicatory hearing. If for some reason the statutes were not, dismissal of the petition would be without prejudice. Sanchez v. Walker County Dep’t of Family & Children Servs., 237 Ga. 406, 229 S.E.2d 66 (1976) (decided under former Code 1933, § 24A-1404). Failure to comply with notice and hearing requirements of the Juvenile Code, after an allegedly deprived child has

been taken from the parent’s custody, prejudices or injures the rights of the parent, primarily the right to possession of the child under former Code 1933, §§ 74-106, 74-108, and 74-203 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 19-7-1, 19-7-25, and 19-9-2). Sanchez v. Walker County Dep’t of Family & Children Servs., 237 Ga. 406, 229 S.E.2d 66 (1976) (decided under former Code 1933, § 24A-1404). Juvenile court erred by not holding a preliminary protective hearing within 72 hours after the children were placed in foster care, by not giving the mother proper notice of the hearing, and by not making the required written findings regarding the children’s welfare. In the Interest of R. B., 346 Ga. App. 564, 816 S.E.2d 706 (2018). Failure to comply with time limits requires dismissal. - Time limits es-

tablished by the General Assembly in the Juvenile Code are jurisdictional and must be strictly adhered to. A failure to comply with the time periods set out in the statute requires dismissal. R.A.S. v. State, 156 Ga. App. 366, 274 S.E.2d 752 (1980), overruled on other grounds, In re R.D.F., 66 Ga. 294, 466 S.E.2d 572 (1996) (decided under former Code 1933, § 24A-1404).

Definition of ‘‘day.’’ - Word ‘‘day,’’ not being qualified, means a calendar or civil day consisting of 24 hours from midnight to midnight. J.B.H. v. State, 139 Ga. App. 199, 228 S.E.2d 189 (1976), overruled on other grounds, In re R.D.F., 266 Ga. 294, 466 S.E.2d 572 (1996) (decided under former Code 1933, § 24A-1404).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Right of indigent parent to appointed counsel in proceeding for invol-

untary termination of parental rights, 80 A.L.R.3d 1141.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: In the Interest Of: S. C. S, a Child (Mother), 784 S.E.2d 83 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).
In the Interest Of: S. C. S, a Child (Mother), 784 S.E.2d 83 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “2 Pursuant to OCGA § 15-11-145 (a), [i]f an alleged dependent child is removed from his or her home and is not returned home, the preliminary protective hearing shall be held promptly and not later than 72 hours after such child is placed in foster care; provided, however, that…”
In the INTEREST OF R. B. Et Al., Child.., 816 S.E.2d 706 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 10× “from her custody and from the children's home without following the statutory guidelines set out in OCGA § 15-11-133, without making the findings required by OCGA § 15-11-134, and without holding a preliminary protective hearing within 72 hours of the children's removal as…”
In the Interest of B. G., a Child, 812 S.E.2d 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “) The uncle was entitled to notice of that hearing, OCGA § 15-11-145 (b), and he was entitled to participate in it.”
In re A. B., 829 S.E.2d 842 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “" OCGA § 15-11-145 (a) provides: "If an alleged dependent child is removed from his or her home and is not returned home, the preliminary protective hearing shall be held promptly and not later than 72 hours after such child is placed in foster care; provided, however, that if…”
In the Interest of M. I., a Child, 809 S.E.2d 540 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Under Uniform Superior Court Rule 6.3, a trial court is required to conduct a hearing on a motion for new trial.”
In the Interest of D. B., Chldren (mother) (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 10× “See OCGA § 15-11-145 (a). Although the Juvenile Code does not define “exceptional circumstances,” the mother contends that we should interpret the term to mean that DFCS can seek ex parte removal only when it alleges an imminent or exigent threat to the children.”
In the Interest of M. R., a Child v. N/A (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “The authorities cited by the juvenile court in support of the production order — OCGA §§ 15-11-145 (h) and 15-11-170 (h) — do not require a different conclusion.”
In the Interest of A. B., a Child (Mother) (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “” 3 OCGA § 15-11-145 (a) provides: “If an alleged dependent child is removed from his or her home and is not returned home, the preliminary protective hearing shall be held promptly and not later than 72 hours after such child is placed in foster care; provided, however, that if…”
In the Interest of M. J., a Child (Mother) (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-11-145(a). The Supreme Court of Georgia “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional…”
— 15-11-145(a) — 1 case
In the Interest of M. J., a Child (Mother) (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). “See OCGA § 15-11-145(a). The Supreme Court of Georgia “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.