O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-19-53 (2019)

Examination and abstract of titles; title insurance; employment of attorneys

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall not prohibit a person, corporation, or voluntary association from examining the record of titles to real property, nor shall it prohibit a person, corporation, or voluntary association from preparing and issuing abstracts of title from such examination of records and certifying to the correctness of the same, nor from issuing policies of insurance on titles to real or personal property, nor from employing an attorney or attorneys in and about their own immediate affairs or in any litigation to which they are or may be a party. However, nothing contained in this Code section shall authorize any person, corporation, or voluntary association other than an attorney at law to express, render, or issue any legal opinion as to the status of the title to real or personal property.

History

(Ga. L. 1931, p. 191, § 1; Code 1933, § 9-403.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Definition of title insurance, § 33-7-8. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Title company may insure titles and employ attorneys to defend actions to which the company is or may be a party. Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Fulkalb, Inc., 56 Ga. App. 742, 193 S.E. 796 (1937). It is neither illegal nor contrary to public policy for a title insurance company to contract to furnish, and to furnish, attorneys at law to defend actions against parties involving titles the company has insured. Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Fulkalb, Inc., 56 Ga. App. 742, 193 S.E. 796 (1937). Title company was an interested party and had such an interest in an action attacking the title insured as would entitle the title company to defend the case by counsel. Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Fulkalb, Inc., 56 Ga. App. 742, 193 S.E. 796 (1937). Use of staff counsel not unauthorized practice of law. - Activity of fur-

nishing an attorney to an insured by an insurance company using ‘‘staff counsel’’ (a salaried full-time employee of the insurance company) to defend a suit covered by a policy issued by the insurance company constitutes activities ‘‘in and about’’ the insurance company’s ‘‘own immediate affairs’’ under O.C.G.A. § 15-19-53 and is therefore not an unauthorized practice of law under O.C.G.A. § 15-19-51. Coscia v. Cunningham, 250 Ga. 521, 299 S.E.2d 880 (1983). Person refusing to permit title insurer to defend action attacking title cannot recover. - If a person whose title has been insured refuses to permit the title company to defend an action attacking the company’s title, as contemplated in the policy issued, the person cannot recover on the policy. Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Fulkalb, Inc., 56 Ga. App. 742, 193 S.E. 796 (1937).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 7 Am. Jur. 2d, Attorneys at Law, § 119 et seq. Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. - 1 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Abstracts of Title, § 2. C.J.S. - 7 C.J.S., Attorney and Client, §§ 32, 39. ALR. - Liability of one employed to examine and report on title for showing an apparent lien or defect not in reality such, 71 ALR 349. Drafting, or filling in blanks in printed forms, of instruments relating to land by real-estate agents, brokers, or managers as constituting practice of law, 53 ALR2d 788. Title examination activities by lending institution, insurance company, or title and abstract company, as illegal practice of law, 85 ALR2d 184.

Liability of attorney for negligence in connection with investigation or certification of title to real estate, 59 ALR3d 1176. Nature of legal services or law-related services which may be performed for others by disbarred or suspended attorney, 87 ALR3d 279. Misrepresentation or concealment by insured or agent avoiding liability by title insurer, 17 ALR4th 1077. Defects affecting marketability of title within meaning of title insurance policy, 18 ALR4th 1311. Negligence in preparing abstract of title as ground of liability to one other than person ordering abstract, 50 ALR4th 314. Unauthorized practice of law - Real estate closings, 119 ALR5th 191. Propriety of insurers’ use of staff attorneys to represent insureds, 2 ALR6th 537.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: Coscia v. Cunningham, 299 S.E.2d 880 (Ga. 1983).
Coscia v. Cunningham, 299 S.E.2d 880 (Ga. 1983). · cites it 16× “§ 9-402), supra, created by OCGA § 15-19-53 (Code Ann. § 9-403). Under the exception, OCGA § 15-19-53 (Code Ann.”
Hines Et Al. v. Holland Et Al., 779 S.E.2d 63 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Although nonattorneys in Georgia have been granted an express statutory right to examine records of titles to real property and to prepare and issue abstracts of title, our legislature has also provided that only “an attorney at law [is authorized] to express, render, or issue…”
In Re Formal Advisory Opinion No. 13-1, 763 S.E.2d 875 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 2× “(OCGA § 15-19-53.) Other persons may provide attorneys with paralegal and clerical services, so long as “at all times the attorney receiving the information or services shall maintain full professional and direct *752 responsibility to his clients for the information and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.